Le Mar 30 décembre 2008 16:37, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le Mar 30 décembre 2008 15:29, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
Hello,
Hi,
Thank you for adapting your packages and providing feedback!
I am converting my font packages to the new guidelines and hit some rpmlint warnings that appear to be template related. Specifically, I followed the /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec from fontpackages-devel that creates absolute symlinks between /etc/fonts/conf.d/$font.conf and /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/$font.conf rpmlint moans about the absolute symlink and wants a relative one. I don't really have an opinion about that and could not find any fedora policy on this one [1].
I didn't find a simple (for me and packagers) way to create relative symlinks here. Individual packages are not supposed to know the values of the directory macros since FPC asked for them in part to hide future value changes from individual packagers.
drat, should have read your link before commenting. I'm not sure how ok it is to add a dep to symlinks for fontpackages-devel. It looks harmless enough, but is this package even in all our spins?
I suppose if I change the templates to use the symlinks command to avoid the rpmlint warning, I need to notify FPC at least (even if it's a minor change, it's still a guidelines change)
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org