Rex Dieter wrote:

Callum Lerwick wrote:

...

On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:43 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:

...

Because, frankly, poo-pooing the current proposal/guidelines in favor of some handy-wavy theoretical lacking-actual-implementation solution, is no solution.

Well, the point is, the current proposal does not address the "multiple packages needlessly updating caches multiple times" problem at all.

Fair enough, I'll investigate hooking into rpm's %posttrans hooks. My findings so far are promising.

I formally withdraw the iconcache proposal as-is, pending investigation of the previously unaddressed "needlessly updating cache multiple times" issue.

-- Rex