perl-devel July 2020

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
270 discussions

[Bug 1835354] New: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [fedora-all]
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835354 Bug ID: 1835354 Summary: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType: rubygem-mail: Out of memory issue through nested MIME parts [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 32 Status: NEW Component: perl-Email-MIME-ContentType Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com Reporter: psampaio(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions of fedora-all. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. For more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as the relevant top-level CVE bugs. Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the fedpkg commit message. NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each other, you may clone this bug as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1795179] New: Non-responsive maintainer check for ddick
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795179 Bug ID: 1795179 Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for ddick Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339 Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: ddick(a)cpan.org Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ddick(a)cpan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for ddick, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package…. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1778699] New: Non-responsive maintainer check for iarnell
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778699 Bug ID: 1778699 Summary: Non-responsive maintainer check for iarnell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-Crypt-Rijndael Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: mkreder(a)gmail.com Reporter: xavier(a)bachelot.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, mkreder(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This bug is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for iarnell, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package…. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain perl-Crypt-Rijndael. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1786000] New: Perl 5.30 always crashed at Perl__invlist_intersection_maybe_complement_2nd by segfault.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786000 Bug ID: 1786000 Summary: Perl 5.30 always crashed at Perl__invlist_intersection_maybe_complement_2nd by segfault. Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: perl Severity: high Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: knoha(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, iarnell(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, mmaslano(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com, psabata(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com, tcallawa(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When I launch weechat, the process always crashed at perl module loading. The backtrace is ~~~ (gdb) bt #0 0x00007fc780bcb625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007fc780bb48d9 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x000055b95e108c75 in weechat_shutdown.cold () #3 <signal handler called> #4 0x00007fc772675c53 in Perl__invlist_intersection_maybe_complement_2nd () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #5 0x00007fc772676295 in S_populate_ANYOF_from_invlist.part.0 () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #6 0x00007fc772685d7f in S_regclass () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #7 0x00007fc77268c5e6 in S_regpiece () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #8 0x00007fc772690e69 in S_regbranch () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #9 0x00007fc772691405 in S_reg () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #10 0x00007fc77269639c in Perl_re_op_compile () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #11 0x00007fc77262af75 in Perl_pmruntime () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #12 0x00007fc77266789b in Perl_yyparse () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #13 0x00007fc7727089c7 in S_doeval_compile () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #14 0x00007fc77270e3b4 in Perl_pp_require () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #15 0x00007fc7726c3606 in Perl_runops_standard () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #16 0x00007fc77263102c in Perl_call_sv () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #17 0x00007fc772633b95 in Perl_call_list () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #18 0x00007fc7726110b0 in S_process_special_blocks.isra.0 () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #19 0x00007fc772629d3f in Perl_newATTRSUB_x () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #20 0x00007fc77262d2e2 in Perl_utilize () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #21 0x00007fc772667d39 in Perl_yyparse () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #22 0x00007fc7727089c7 in S_doeval_compile () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #23 0x00007fc77270e3b4 in Perl_pp_require () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #24 0x00007fc7726c3606 in Perl_runops_standard () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #25 0x00007fc772631789 in Perl_eval_sv () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #26 0x00007fc772631b1d in Perl_eval_pv () from /lib64/libperl.so.5.30 #27 0x00007fc772927624 in weechat_perl_load () from /usr/lib64/weechat/plugins/perl.so #28 0x000055b95e14078c in util_exec_on_files () #29 0x00007fc772dfb455 in plugin_script_auto_load () from /usr/lib64/weechat/plugins/guile.so #30 0x00007fc772dfb868 in plugin_script_init () from /usr/lib64/weechat/plugins/guile.so #31 0x00007fc77292a93c in weechat_plugin_init () from /usr/lib64/weechat/plugins/perl.so #32 0x000055b95e1857db in plugin_call_init () #33 0x000055b95e1871d5 in plugin_auto_load () #34 0x000055b95e1878b0 in plugin_init () #35 0x000055b95e109fb0 in weechat_init () #36 0x000055b95e108cc8 in main () ~~~ The issue seems to be same as https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17154. It looks that we should rebase perl to the fixed version because the fix can't be backportable into perl5.30. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1781758] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781758 Bug ID: 1781758 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Protocol-WebSocket Assignee: ddick(a)cpan.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ddick(a)cpan.org, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Protocol-WebSocket. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1781757] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781757 Bug ID: 1781757 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-POSIX-strptime Assignee: lkundrak(a)v3.sk Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: filip(a)andresovi.net, holcapek(a)gmail.com, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, scenek(a)gmail.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-POSIX-strptime. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1781741] New: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781741 Bug ID: 1781741 Summary: Co-maintainer request (to maintain EPEL8 branch) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX Assignee: ddick(a)cpan.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: ddick(a)cpan.org, jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, We are working on bringing multiple perl packages into a 'upstream' (EPEL) which we use internally (at GoodData). This package is one of many which have builds in Fedora Rawhide but lacks EPEL8 branch. We would like to request it and help you to maintain the package (incl. Fedora Rawhide). Please add us to a maintainer list for the package perl-Excel-Writer-XLSX. Our FAS usernames are: - tjmc - kubo Thanks for the cooperation in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1781205] New: XML::LibXSLT appears to suffer from latent libxml2's API misuse, only got exposed with libxml2 2.9.10
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1781205 Bug ID: 1781205 Summary: XML::LibXSLT appears to suffer from latent libxml2's API misuse, only got exposed with libxml2 2.9.10 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: jpokorny(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, zing(a)fastmail.fm Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora This is a mirror copy of an upstream report: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=131146 It is supposed to be the root cause of FTBFS for publican and pacemaker with some architectures like i686: - publican [bug 1777056] - pacemaker, which triggered this whole investigation [bug 1776552] There's already a parallel request to include upstream patch to libxml2 as a quick fix for those FTBFS, _however_ that is _not_ a systemic fix for a latent breakage for XML::LibXSLT stemming from misuse of libxml2's API -- it shall rather be fixed in the first place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1748928] New: perl-PDL-2.19.0-8 FTBFS: proj-nad dependency does not exist
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748928 Bug ID: 1748928 Summary: perl-PDL-2.19.0-8 FTBFS: proj-nad dependency does not exist Product: Fedora Version: 31 Status: NEW Component: perl-PDL Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, john.j5live(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz, lkundrak(a)v3.sk, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora perl-PDL-2.19.0-8 fails to build in F31 because proj-nad does not exist there. According to proj-5.2.0-5.fc31 changelog, proj-nad package was renamed to proj-datumgrid. Please note that in F32 is a rebased proj-6.2.0 with a different API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1731721] New: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 May '21

25 May '21

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731721 Bug ID: 1731721 Summary: perl-Font-AFM depends on files/directories from non-standard locations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Font-AFM Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203(a)freenet.de, rob.myers(a)gtri.gatech.edu, tcallawa(a)redhat.com, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk Blocks: 1731683 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from /usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0]. Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more information about package/dependencies. --- perl-Font-AFM-1.20-30.fc31.src: - /usr/share/a2ps/afm/phvr.afm --- Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct. It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths. Thanks for cooperation! [0] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_direct… Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683 [Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel July 2020