Christopher Stone a écrit :
>> If we update pear to introduce a new version and macro which are
>> required to register the pecl extension, we need a mass-rebuild,
>> whatever is the new version (1.5.x or 1.6.x) (and new Requires).
>
> Would the pecl packages be *required* to be rebuilt? Would their
> behavior be the same as they are now if they are not rebuilt? If we
> rebuild the pecl packages it only makes it so they show up correctly
> with the pecl command, correct?
>
You're right.
Package not rebuild will still work without being registered.
Note that some pecl extension still doesn't register on F8.
Remi.