python-devel April 2016

python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

13 participants
9 discussions

[Python-SIG] Self-Introduction: Tim Orling
by Tim Orling 15 Aug '16

15 Aug '16

Greetings, I recently became a co-maintainer for pystatgrab [1] and am a contributor to upstream [2]. I am a co-founder and co-maintainer of the meta-python [3] and meta-maker [4] layers for OpenEmbedded. I am also a contributor to IronPython [5] and RobotFramework [6]. In my professional life, I work for the Intel Open Technology Center on the Yocto Project, which depends heavily on Python for its tools and infrastructure. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pystatgrab/ [2] https://github.com/i-scream/pystatgrab/graphs/contributors [3] https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-python/ [4] https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-maker/ [5] https://github.com/orgs/IronLanguages/people [6] https://github.com/robotframework/robotframework/graphs/contributors

5 12

krop and python3
by Raphael Groner 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

Hi, I need some help to fix a bug ¹ with python3 and site-packages. > cd /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/krop/ > python2 -c 'import krop ; krop.main()' → dialog > python3 -c 'import krop ; krop.main()' Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/krop/krop.py", line 25, in main formatter_class=RawTextHelpFormatter) TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'version' Besides that error, the start script in %{_bindir}/krop is b0rken and should just work for users clicking on the desktop icon. ¹ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321376

2 5

Python-SIG application
by Petr Viktorin 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

I've applied to the python-sig FAS group and mailing list. According to [SIG page] I also need to introduce myself, so here goes: Hello! I'm the keeper of [PortingDB], team lead in Red Hat's Python Maintenance team, and I'm generally interested Python in Fedora. Please let me in? :) [PortingDB] http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/ -- Petr Viktorin

4 3

F24 Beta Release Notes (coming next week)
by Justin W. Flory 26 Apr '16

26 Apr '16

Hello all, Before going further, please note this is a cross-posted thread! There is a low-traffic mailing list, logistics(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, which was created for multi-list collaboration on things like this topic. To centralize discussion, please consider using that list for replies (even if you unsubscribe after the discussion finishes). Anyways, assuming all goes according to plan, the F24 Beta is due to land on May 3rd, or in seven days from today. Therefore, it's time to review and look over the release notes for the F24 Beta. The current draft can be found on the wiki. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F24_Beta_release_announcement As of now, it is a forked version of the Alpha release announcement with a few changes based on information I gathered from #fedora-qa. If you could take some time to review the release notes and ensure everything is *current* and correct since the Alpha release for areas you are familiar and knowledgeable with, that would be appreciated so we can aim to ship this next week. Thanks all! -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7(a)gmail.com

1 0

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter
by Thomas Spura 18 Apr '16

18 Apr '16

Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr. 2016 um 12:04 Uhr: > On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and > (co-)maintaining > > the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :) > > > Am happy to help review packages, and will have a window of time in > the coming two weeks where I'll have more time than usual :). Is there > any kind of tracking bug set up for this? > I just added a few review requests and the one for the notebook could serve as the tracking bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327979 It seems jupyter-core has no further dependencies and could be reviewed first: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994 Thanks for joining the jupyter party! :) Thomas

1 0

Re: ipython 4 and Jupyter
by Thomas Spura 18 Apr '16

18 Apr '16

Philippe Makowski <makowski.fedora(a)gmail.com> schrieb am So., 17. Apr. 2016 um 19:29 Uhr: > Hi, > > just in case, I started to package ipython 4 and Jupyter in Mageia.. > my progress is there https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Philippem > > may be it could help for Fedora. > Thank you for your effort. It is of help to see which packages in Fedora need new reviews. > For help, I saw also that Debian started the work too. > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and (co-)maintaining the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :) Best, Thomas

1 0

RFC: Using the new optional python module dependency generator in Fedora
by Neal Gompa 13 Apr '16

13 Apr '16

Hello all, It's been a while since I messaged this list about the new dependency generator being upstreamed into RPM[0]. Since then, I've taken your valuable feedback and incorporated it into the version that now sits in RPM git master[1]. A little bit ago, I pushed a package to Copr[2] that includes this updated dependency generator, and I would love for people to take a look at it, try it out, and see how well it works. Instructions on setting up and configuring are on the Copr page. I'd also love this become enabled in Fedora's Python stack for Fedora 25, giving us nice Provides/Requires chains that are independent of the package name, but map more closely to PyPi names that people would recognize from using pip or other tools. We already have similar things in place for Ruby, Mono, Perl, and even MinGW in Fedora, so it'd be nice to have it on the Python side, too. Best regards, Neal [0]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproj… [1]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/master/scripts/pythondi… [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/rpm-depgen-pythondistdeps/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!

3 3

Re: python F23 update testing needed
by Jan Pokorný 07 Apr '16

07 Apr '16

On 02/04/16 13:58 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 02/04/16 12:26 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 31/03/16 21:28 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>> I've just submitted >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 >>> >>> This update does two things: >>> >>> - Updates python to version 2.7.11 >>> - Splits out the python macros into separate packages >>> >>> It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with >>> these packages installed. >> >> This might be the cause of a recent failure to build Pacemaker while >> other Fedoras (24 + 25) were OK: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13522053 >> >> See >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2053/13522053/mock_output.log >> >>> Package python-macros is obsoleted by python-rpm-macros, but >>> obsoleting package does not provide for requirements > > Subsequent build succeeded, though: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750257 > > So it must have been an intermittent issue. > Can this be prevented next time a basic build dependency > is restructured? Or would it require additional support > in the build infra? I tried to investigate this a little bit. 6 days ago, at around the point the build failed, several overrides for the build root have been requested: python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-rpm-macros-3-7.fc23 redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/redhat-rpm-config-36-1.fc23.1 python-2.7.11-2.fc23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-2.fc23 All but the last, expired on 2016-04-01, appear active at the moment. The last one was superseded with python-2.7.11-3.fc23: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/overrides/python-2.7.11-3.fc23, which is also active right now. But clearly, at the moment of the linked build that failed, python-rpm-macros and redhat-rpm-config were overridden whereas python-macros-2.7.10-8.fc23+ wasn't. It looks to me I hit a racy window in which python-2.7.11-2.fc23 override hasn't yet been applied. And later, at the moment of the linked build that succeeded, no such override was active. I would conclude, please be more careful about management of overrides to prevent this kind of mess-ups. Does bodhi allow to specify several builds as a means of an atomic (non-racy) override? Should I file a RFE for that if not? -- Jan (Poki)

1 0

python F23 update testing needed
by Orion Poplawski 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

I've just submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcddcc1f06 This update does two things: - Updates python to version 2.7.11 - Splits out the python macros into separate packages It would be helpful if packagers would try building python packages with these packages installed. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

python-devel April 2016