ruby-sig July 2012

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

13 participants
13 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

Ruby 2.0
by Vít Ondruch 05 Dec '12

05 Dec '12

Hi, Just for your information, I have pushed ruby-2.0 branch into the Ruby's git repo. So if you like test the latest Ruby, you need to get the latest HEAD tarball, which could be prepared using: $ cd /path/to/your/ruby/sources $ ./tool/make-snapshot tmp Note that you have to have available subversion and bison on your system. Also note that the content of tarball is needed to be repacked, that the Ruby sources will be stored in "ruby-2.0.0-p0" folder (I know, it is annoyance, but you can fix the spec and send me a patch ;). Also note that I currently keep the ruby_abi at 1.9.1, while the official release will have 2.0.0 probably. This should allow you to use Fedora's gems without rebuild. Any comments/patches are appreciated. Vit [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ruby.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/ruby-2…

1 3

Ruby-SIG meeting at FUDCon Paris 2012?
by Vít Ondruch 21 Sep '12

21 Sep '12

Hi Rubyists, Since me and bkabrda are coming to FUDCon Paris, it would be nice opportunity to meet you, other Rubyists, and discuss some topics and future directions of Ruby in Fedora. Please let us know who would be interested to come and share your topics, which should be discussed. I can throw in several right now: * JRuby and Rubinius in Fedora and their integration with RubyGems. * Bundler? * Rails 3(4) in Fedora. * Redmine, Passenger? * Parallel installation of several gem versions. * gem2rpm improvements Vit

3 4

is-it-fedora-ruby update
by Mo Morsi 21 Aug '12

21 Aug '12

Just a quick update regarding the Fedora/Ruby project Zuhao has been working on as part of the Google Summer of Code. As many of you may remember, Zuhao has been working on a rails based site to highlight the ruby sig's community's effort in packaging ruby gems, developing ruby software, and overall improving the Ruby experience on Fedora. Zuhao has made great headway with the project so far, implementing Rake modules that allows us to pull the gem and rpm packages into the local db as well as various frontend interfaces which to display and cross-reference the gem / rpm metadata and other info [1][2]. Various other features are in progress including the ability to comment and rate specific packages, a section highlighting various projects based on the Fedora / Ruby stack, and a mechanism to more closely integrate w/ rubygems as gems are pushed. I've hosted the website on one of my servers for the time being and pointed a subdomain to it [3]. Towards the end of the summer we'll update the site with the latest developments, reserve the is-it-fedora-ruby (or other) domain, and point it at the server. Any comments or feedback would be more than appreciated as well as any patches or feature requests for the codebase. I'd like to thank Zuhao for the work so far and am looking forward to seeing the site continue to develop. -Mo [1] http://mo.morsi.org/files/gsoc/isitfedoraruby/02-gem-list.png [2] http://mo.morsi.org/files/gsoc/isitfedoraruby/03-packages-by-popularity.png [3] http://isitfedoraruby.syracloud.net/ [4] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/tree/create-controllers

2 3

Rails updated to 3.2.6 in Rawhide
by Bohuslav Kabrda 31 Jul '12

31 Jul '12

Hi all! The Ruby on Rails stack has been updated to 3.2.6 version in Rawhide, as it was submitted in the Rails 3.2 Feature [1]. I'd like to ask all owners of depending packages to start rebuilding (or updating, if necessary). The depending packages are listed at [2]. Thanks! -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2#Dependencies

2 1

Redmine in Fedora?
by Emanuel Rietveld 19 Jul '12

19 Jul '12

Replying to list to get wider discussion. > Posted by Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda on 2012-07-13 04:21:44 EDT > to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825495 > [Review Request: redmine] > > Emanuel, > I'm not sure we want redmine in Fedora. It would make us always > have its specified version of rails. I don't think we want to > have our hands tied with that. What if we want to get rails 4 > (when they get released) into Fedora and redmine still relies > on 3.2.3? This would limit us greatly, I have to say I am > against that. > > A solution to your problem might be creating a software > collection [1], [2], which would be independent on system Gems > versions. Unfortunately, software collections are not allowed > into Fedora [3] - but I believe that if enough users would want > to use them for projects like this, FPC would allow them. > Redmine is a great candidate for a software collection, I think > [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html… > [2] https://fedorahosted.org/SoftwareCollections/ > [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Software_Collection_Mac… What I want to achieve with this redmine package is: - a high quality package by getting feedback from the community - an easy installation with sane defaults for redmine users A software collection goes part of the way there, but has some disadvantages by not being a first class citizen of Fedora. When the rails community drops support for rails version 3, it should not be wise to still run Redmine installations for rails 3. At that time, we should work with upstream to make redmine work on rails 4. When rails 4 is released but rails 3 is still supported, I see no reason why we could not have rails 3 and rails 4 side by side in Fedora. We do it for packages like python too. Do you think having redmine in Fedora would limit your freedom to move the Fedora versions at the same speed that the upstream community is moving? Why? Should this problem be solved in Fedora or in the application (redmine upstream)? How can a package maintainer help? Thank you for your comment, Emanuel

7 12

Greetings
by Jayson Rowe 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hello All, I'm somewhat new (back) to Fedora, and I'm looking into various SIGs get get involved with. I'm curious about the Ruby SIG, and Ruby in general. I've always managed Ruby with RVM. What are the advantages/disadvantages of using the Fedora provided packages? Is there a way to do "gemsets" without using RVM? Also, what ways could I help out the SIG? Thanks for any info! -- -jayson

5 6

Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18
by Bohuslav Kabrda 18 Jul '12

18 Jul '12

Hi all, I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18 [1] - I figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before submitting the feature to FESCo. Thanks. -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2

4 9

Re: ABRT for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 17 Jul '12

17 Jul '12

Hi Jakub, Thank you for your patches. I have integrated them into v0.0.3 which is now available at RubyGems and as a SRPM in the review referenced earlier. There also other news in this release: * Exectubale name is extracted from backtrace, to prevent possible issues when $PROGRAM_NAME is modified in runtime. * Oneline scripts and scripts executed from relative paths are ignored. * Improved test suite. And as always, feedback is appreciated. Vit Dne 10.7.2012 11:55, Jakub Filak napsal(a): > Hi Vit, > > I'd rather use 'Ruby' as value of the analyzer field. If the analyzer field is > set to 'Python' the ABRT believes that the backtrace field contains a python > backtrace. A new analyzer/type needs a proper configuration of events, > therefore I prepared a patch that changes the analyzer value to 'Ruby' and > adds a configuration file. > > (I changed rubygem-abrt.spec because the configuration file must be installed > to /etc/libreport/events.d/). > > The patches are attached. > > > Regards > Jakub > > > On Monday 09 of July 2012 15:47:51 Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Updated ABRT gem version 0.0.2 is available at RubyGems.org if you like >> to test it. I'd love to hear some feedback. >> >> There were done following changes: >> >> * Improved code base >> * Better handling of some edge cases, such as call to Kernel#exit or >> Ctrl+C event >> * Test suite added >> * Improved documentation >> >> I also prepared RPM for Fedora. Review is available at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838568 >> >> >> Vit

1 0

Re: Ruby and Fedora 17
by Bohuslav Kabrda 16 Jul '12

16 Jul '12

Hi Phil, ----- Original Message ----- > Slavek, > > > On 2012-07-16 18:02, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > Hi Phil, > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Bohuslav, > >> > >> > >> On Jul 16 05:39:29 UTC 2012 Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >> > On 2012-07-15 15:23, Philip Rhoades wrote: > >> > > Bohuslav, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On 2012-06-19 20:44, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> since Ruby/Fedora integration had some significant changes > >> > >> from > >> > F16 > >> > >> to F17, I thought it might be a good idea to write a summary > >> > >> of > >> > new > >> > >> features and send it out for all - see [1]. > >> > >> > >> > >> All comments and suggestions for further development are > >> > >> welcome. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On a Fedora 17 x86_64 install: > >> > > > >> > > gem list > >> > > > >> > > shows: > >> > > > >> > > actionmailer (3.2.6) > >> > > . . > >> > > > >> > > but: > >> > > > >> > > updateb > >> > > locate gem | grep actionmailer > >> > > > >> > > show nothing? > >> > > > >> > > What gives? > >> > > >> > Hi Phil, > >> > I can't find a way to reproduce the issue. I tried installing > >> > the > >> > gem > >> > both with "gem install" and "sudo gem install" and both > >> > locations > >> > are > >> > found with "locate gem | grep actionmailer". > >> > Could you please provide more specific info: > >> > - How did you install the gem? (with or without sudo) > >> > - Was the installation successful? > >> > - Is the actionmailer-3.2.6 directory located under > >> > "/usr/local/share/gems/gems" or > >> > "/home/<yourusername>/.gem/ruby/1.9.1/gems"? > >> > >> > >> I think I found this after I had done: > >> > >> yum install rubygems > >> > >> - would that allow "gem list" to show "actionmailer" ? > >> > > > > If you have installed Ruby from Fedora, the Rubygems must have been > > installed too, so doing "yum install rubygems" probably did > > nothing. > > "gem list" command is the standard way to find what gems you have > > installed on your system. > > > I understand that - that is why I was surprised that "actionmailer" > apppeared in the list but I couldn't find where it was in the file > system (as I could in previous versions). > > > > Actually I am not sure about the > > "updatedb/locate" stuff, I'm not familiar with it very much. > > > A DB of Existing files in the file system are updated usually by a > cron > job nightly but the update can be forced with "updatedb" - locate > just > shows the existence of a search string in the updated database ie the > location of the file. > > > > Could you please answer all the questions from my previous email? > > > I thought I had - trying again: > > - I had not done any "gem install xx" only "yum install rubygems" > > - I didn't have any errors up to that point > > - The "actionmailer" dir could not be found at that time - of course > after further "gem install xx" it exists now under: > "/usr/local/share/gems/gems" > > => That's why I suggested trying to reproduce the problem with a > fresh > install of a virtual machine . . > Hmm, so I have precisely the same setup and locate can see actionmailer in /usr/local/share/gems/gems. Is it possible that you're running "locate" under a user who can't read the directory? I'm kind of running out of ideas. It seems that this is not Rubygems related problem. I tried this locally: yum install rubygems gem install actionmailer updatedb locate gem | grep actionmailer These steps printed bunch of the files under /usr/local/share/gems for me, so I can't really reproduce the issue. Does anyone else have any idea what might be going on here? > > > Also, was this a fresh Fedora 17 install or an upgrade from an > > older > > Fedora? > > > As I said/implied before it was a fresh Fedora install on a virtual > machine. > > Thanks, > > Phil. -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig July 2012