ruby-sig June 2014

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
9 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

RSpec 3
by Julian C. Dunn 08 Sep '14

08 Sep '14

Hi again, I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test suites. We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide. Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel? I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be able to run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes. - Julian [ Julian C. Dunn <jdunn(a)aquezada.com> * Sorry, I'm ] [ WWW: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian * only Web 1.0 ] [ gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/ * compliant! ] [ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]

5 11

gem2rpm and upgrades of existing rpms
by Joe Rafaniello 25 Jun '14

25 Jun '14

Hi all, Does anyone use gem2rpm to upgrade an existing rpm to new versions of upstream gems? I'm contemplating working on a pull request to make gem2rpm aware of an existing .spec file and only update specific sections such as: version, requires, buildrequires, and adding a changelog. As it is now, it overwrites the existing rpm spec, removing any changelog entries, etc. Is this a good idea? What do others do to regenerate the updated version, requires/buildrequires to avoid human error? Thanks, -- Joe Rafaniello

5 17

HEADS UP pushed rubygem-faraday w/o tests
by Achilleas Pipinellis 19 Jun '14

19 Jun '14

FYI, rubygem-farady is broken in rawhide due to a dependency update [0]. I will push it without running the test suite because of its complex nature. The test is ran by a bash script [0] which is difficult to implement inside the spec file. I'll take a look at it some time later. If anyone has any thoughts on how to run it please do share. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107112 [1] https://github.com/lostisland/faraday/blob/master/script/test -- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me

1 0

Fitting most of supported Fedora/EPEL versions in a single spec
by Achilleas Pipinellis 18 Jun '14

18 Jun '14

For starters, the title says **most of**, because I'm not including EPEL5 :p To the point. Now that we have some common ground between the packaging guidelines, I'm trying to get together a template for packaging: fc19, fc20, fc21, el6, el7. I haven't yet packaged anything for EPEL6, so I searched ruby-sig and found some answers. So far I have written down the R/BR, so please correct me I am wrong. Here goes: ``` %if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} || 0%{?el7} Requires: ruby(release) Requires: ruby(rubygems) %endif %if 0%{?el6} Requires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi} Requires: ruby(rubygems) BuildRequires: ruby(abi) >= %{rubyabi} %else BuildRequires: ruby(release) %endif BuildRequires: rubygems-devel %if 0%{?fc19} || 0%{?fc20} || 0%{?el7} || 0%{?el6} Provides: rubygem(%{gem_name}) = %{version} %endif ``` Next parts are: 1) if gem has native extensions: different %install macro 2) if gem has minitest: build minitest5 for el7 [0] If I left something out please advise. Thanks! [0] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-minitest/ -- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me

3 4

yajl-ruby in Fedora
by Ken Dreyer 13 Jun '14

13 Jun '14

It would be really nice to have yajl-ruby in Fedora. This gem blocks Vagrant as well as Gitorious ( http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/gitorious/graph.png) and I think GitLab would be affected as well. The review request has been open for a while: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351 It seems that we're waiting for upstream to merge https://github.com/brianmario/yajl-ruby/pull/113 ? Is there anything else I can do to get traction on this? - Ken

3 4

packages failing to build on F21 due to minitest5
by Julian C. Dunn 12 Jun '14

12 Jun '14

Hi folks, looks like many of us have failing packages on the f21-build tag due to the same reason: Minitest 5 is in F21 whereas many upstream test suites are for Minitest 4. What's the accepted wisdom to fixing these? Disable tests on f21+? Convince upstream to upgrade? Both? Other suggestions? - Julian -- [ Julian C. Dunn <jdunn(a)aquezada.com> * Sorry, I'm ] [ WWW: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian * only Web 1.0 ] [ gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/ * compliant! ] [ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]

4 3

Test
by Darryl L. Pierce 05 Jun '14

05 Jun '14

Haven't seen any emails in a mighty long time from the list, but the archive shows activity as recently as 3 days ago... -- Darryl L. Pierce <mcpierce(a)gmail.com> "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"

2 1

Packages to review + questions
by František Dvořák 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello, could I ask somebody to review these packages?: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079640 rubygem-json_spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076976 rubygem-settingslogic They are my first ruby packages, so I'm not sure about some fedora-review complains: [!]: Gem should use %gem_install macro. - false alarm? [ ]: Specfile should use macros from rubygem-devel package. Note: The specfile doesn't use these macros: /usr/share/gems/specifications/settingslogic-2.0.9.gemspec, % exclude /usr/share/gems/cache/settingslogic-2.0.9.gem gems should require rubygems package Note: Requires: rubygems missing in rubygem-settingslogic-doc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#RubyGems - there is rubygems R-dep only indirectly from the base package, but it is probably better to have the direct dependency too? (-doc is using rubygems directories) Thank you, František

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig June 2014