ruby-sig January 2017

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
9 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 25 Jan '22

25 Jan '22

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 18

ruby-sig FAS group and rubygems build in Copr
by Vít Ondruch 20 Apr '17

20 Apr '17

Hi everybody, You probably noticed, that there is ongoing build of all Python packages in Copr [1] and today, I was approached by Miroslav Suchý, that he'd like to do the same for rubygems. And this in turn triggered these questions: 1) Would you be interested to create ruby-sig group in FAS? We could make the group owner of some packages and in turn, the members of the group could maintain the packages, without explicitly asking for some ACLs. 2) For the Copr rebuild of rubygems, there needs to be some FAS group again. Python guys are asking for "pypi-builds-sig" group [2], hence following their lead, I'd like to ask for "rubygems-builds-sig" group (note that although I don't like the '-sig' suffix in this case, it is mandated by the infrastructure ticket template). So what are your thoughts? Vít [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5311

5 11

Fwd: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170117.n.0 changes
by Vít Ondruch 31 Jan '17

31 Jan '17

Looking at the list of broken dependencies, it seems that we have some work to do. IOW there are quite some packages, which have hard dependency on older JSON. Although there are several things to note at this place: 1. DNF/RPM might be able to install the packages due to this [1] bug 2. RubyGems won't be able to load such dependencies, on the other hand, since JSON is default gem and it is always available in the $LOAD_PATH, RubyGems might not be involved at all. We should fix it anyway ... Vít [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389871 -------- Přeposlaná zpráva -------- Předmět: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170117.n.0 changes Datum: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:41:12 +0000 Od: Fedora Rawhide Report <rawhide(a)fedoraproject.org> Přeposláno - Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Komu: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org [rubygem-aws-sdk] rubygem-aws-sdk-1.60.2-3.fc24.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-capillary] rubygem-capillary-1.0.4-6.fc24.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-coveralls] rubygem-coveralls-0.8.13-1.fc26.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 rubygem-coveralls-0.8.13-1.fc26.noarch requires rubygem(simplecov) < 0:0.12 [rubygem-linode] rubygem-linode-0.8.1-3.fc24.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-occi-api] rubygem-occi-api-4.3.6-1.fc25.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-occi-cli] rubygem-occi-cli-4.3.6-1.fc26.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-pkgwat] rubygem-pkgwat-0.1.4-8.fc24.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-rdoc] rubygem-rdoc-4.2.2-2.fc25.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2 [rubygem-sdoc] rubygem-sdoc-0.4.1-4.fc24.noarch requires rubygem(json) < 0:2

1 1

Orphaning rubygem-linode
by Vít Ondruch 26 Jan '17

26 Jan '17

Hi, I just updated and fixed rubygem-linode, but since I have no use for this package, I just orphaned it in PkgDb. Feel free to pick it up or let it go away ... Vít

1 0

Ruby 2.4 - Mass rebuild
by Vít Ondruch 17 Jan '17

17 Jan '17

Hi all, So finally time for some fun. Since the Ruby 2.4 change proposal [1] was accepted, I asked release engineering for sidetag [3] to start with rebuild. This sidetag was granted and I was able to build there Ruby itself as well as several of my packages. Now is time for your help as well. What does it means? This is the list of packages which very likely needs to be rebuild: ``` $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort | uniq ``` You can take the package and just fire rebuild, but please, you should be using f26-ruby24 build target [3], i.e. the build command should look like: ``` $ fedpkg build --target f26-ruby24 ``` If you forget to specify the target, you'll do build against Ruby 2.3, which is not what you want. If you don't make it soon enough, I'll very likely rebuild your package sooner or later. I'll be using fermig [4] to do that as I did during previous rebuilds. If you don't like me to touch you package for whatever reason, please let me know (Mamoru, I suppose you are going to rebuild your packages yourself, right?). You can follow the progress at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=401&order=-bui… or using: ``` $ koji list-tagged f26-ruby24 ``` As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome. Vít [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.4 [2] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1659 [3] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6579 [4] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig

3 17

Ruby packages free to grap
by Vít Ondruch 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

Hi all, Michal Fojtík recently orphaned all his packages due to lack of the resources to maintain them properly (thans to taking care of them). Feel free to grab some: rpms/deltacloud-core -- Deltacloud REST API ( ) rpms/rubygem-aws -- Ruby gem for all Amazon Web Services ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-cri -- Ruby library for building easy-to-use commandline tools ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-deltacloud-client -- Deltacloud REST Client ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-echoe -- A Rubygems packaging tool that provides Rake tasks for documentation, extension compiling, testing, and deployment ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-factory_girl -- Framework and DSL for defining and using model instance factories ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-openstack -- Ruby Openstack Compute and Object-Store bindings ( master f25 f24 el6 ) rpms/rubygem-progressbar -- Ruby text progress bar generator library ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-rack-accept -- HTTP Accept* for Ruby/Rack ( master f25 f24 el6 el5 ) rpms/rubygem-rerun -- Restarts your app when a file changes ( master f25 f24 el6 el5 ) rpms/rubygem-right_aws -- Interface classes for the Amazon EC2/EBS, SQS, S3, SDB, and ACF Web Services ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-simple-navigation -- Ruby library for creating navigation for your Rails or Sinatra application ( master f25 f24 ) rpms/rubygem-sinatra-rabbit -- Ruby DSL for creating restful applications using Sinatra ( master f25 f24 el6 ) rpms/rubygem-will_paginate -- Pagination plugin for web frameworks and other apps ( master f25 f24 el5 ) rpms/rubygem-xml-simple -- A simple API for XML processing ( master f25 f24 el6 el5 ) Thanks Vít

1 0

RSpec and Cucumber on Ruby 2.4
by Jun Aruga 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hello Ruby Sig folks Right now I am trying to fix the issues of RSpec and Cucumber Fedora packages for Ruby 2.4 compatibility. Because I want to create Red Hat Software Collections based on that. Related packages needed by RSpec and Cucumber are as follows. Several packages got error on Koschei [1]. and several packages passed, but several pakcages do not have valid tests on %check section. So, I am trying to fix that. and am going to send patch to the package owner. But if you are the package owner, and you have a time to fix that, I am also happy for you to fix it. rubygem-aruba rubygem-builder rubygem-childprocess rubygem-coderay rubygem-cucumber rubygem-cucumber-core rubygem-cucumber-wire rubygem-diff-lcs rubygem-ffi rubygem-flexmock rubygem-gherkin rubygem-introspection rubygem-metaclass rubygem-mocha rubygem-multi_json rubygem-multi_test rubygem-nokogiri rubygem-rr rubygem-rspec rubygem-rspec-core rubygem-rspec-expectations rubygem-rspec-mocks rubygem-rspec-support rubygem-thread_order Thank you. [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/ -- Jun Aruga jaruga(a)redhat.com IRC: jaruga, Office: FBC1, Brno, Czech Republic

2 3

Ruby 2.4 change proposal
by Vít Ondruch 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi rubyists, I put together change proposal for Ruby 2.4 in Fedora 26 [1]. Any feedback is welcome. If no feedback, I'll propose this change to package wrangler in a week or so ... Vít [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.4

1 2

Ruby 2.4
by Vít Ondruch 02 Jan '17

02 Jan '17

Hi everybody, Time is running past and it is almost 6 months of development of Ruby 2.4. So I started to prepare some test build again. I am pushing all the changes into private-ruby-2.4 branch of dist-git if you are interested and here is the build of r55184: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14278233 One notable change is that XMLRPC library was extracted into separate gem, so rubygem-xmlrpc is now available as Ruby subpackage. Please give it a try and let me know if anything goes wrong. Vít

2 19

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig January 2017