Is anyone else having issues with the % sandbox -i [path] not working? What happens is the context is incorrectly done. % rpm -q -f /usr/bin/sandbox shows I am using policycoreutils-python-utils-2.4-20.fc23.x86_64
%ls -Zd /tmp/.sandbox_home_[whatever] gives unconfined_u:object_r:sandbox_file_t:s0:cxx,cyyy . BUT %ls -Z [path] is gives unconfined_u:object_r:mozilla_home_t:s0 [path]
This causes all sorts of read/write issues.
I guess I can write a script to do the chcon, but that is a bit painful and you have to hunt for the correct sandbox directory (not optimal at all).
Any suggestions? Bill Chimiak LTS
On 03/07/2016 06:18 PM, Bill wrote:
Is anyone else having issues with the % sandbox -i [path] not working? What happens is the context is incorrectly done. % rpm -q -f /usr/bin/sandbox shows I am using policycoreutils-python-utils-2.4-20.fc23.x86_64
%ls -Zd /tmp/.sandbox_home_[whatever] gives unconfined_u:object_r:sandbox_file_t:s0:cxx,cyyy . BUT %ls -Z [path] is gives unconfined_u:object_r:mozilla_home_t:s0 [path]
Ok I can reproduce it. Could you please reopen a new bug?
Thank you.
This causes all sorts of read/write issues.
I guess I can write a script to do the chcon, but that is a bit painful and you have to hunt for the correct sandbox directory (not optimal at all).
Any suggestions? Bill Chimiak LTS -- selinux mailing list selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Bill -
Miroslav Grepl