Hello,
Since the recommendation is to work with modules. I was wondering if this is still true for the mls extension:
"Security level statements are valid only in monolithic policies and base loadable modules. They are not valid in conditional statemens and non-base loadable modules". (Security level statements refers to sensitivity definition).
So, in the case of an mls extension I have to work with a monolithic policy, is that right?
Thanks, Sandra
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 10:12 -0400, Sandra Julieta Rueda Rodriguez wrote:
Hello,
Since the recommendation is to work with modules. I was wondering if this is still true for the mls extension:
"Security level statements are valid only in monolithic policies and base loadable modules. They are not valid in conditional statemens and non-base loadable modules". (Security level statements refers to sensitivity definition).
So, in the case of an mls extension I have to work with a monolithic policy, is that right?
Not necessarily; you can still use modular policy, but you have to replace the base module with one that contains your new definitions.
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org