test January 2004

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

133 participants
104 discussions

anyone using raid?>
by jason pearl 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

is anyone using a raid card like highpoint rocketraid 454 and have it working? I can only get it to work on redhat 9 can anyone give me some info. i have not found anything at websites. thanks jason

1 0

Fedora Bug Day Tomorrow: Jan 28th 2004: Bugzilla versus Mothra
by Jef Spaleta 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

What: Fedora Bug Day: General Fedora Triage Why: Bugs bad...Closing bugs good Who: Everybody and anybody who wants to help developers make better use of their time. Programming experience, isn't necessary to make a worthwhile contribution to the triaging effort. But programmers are welcome to. Who knows you might even stumble on a bug you can fix by submitting your own patch! For the rest of us, just digging into bugzilla and finding bugreports to mark as duplicates can help save developers some time. How: Simply pick an existing Fedora Core bug to triage, jump on the #fedora-bugs during the stated times on Weds Jan 28th and convince me that the bug should be closed or marked up as a high priority for review. When: Jan 28th 9am EST (or right after i get my first cup of coffee) to let's say 6pm-ish EST (right before my wife tells me I need to drive her home from work). Allow of course for some gaps in between when my boss and found my hiding place and needs me to do something. No Clue What I'm talking about when I say the phrase Fedora Triage? Take a quick look at the fedora-triage-list archives: https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/fedora-triage-list/ These messages should hopefully tell you what its all about in more detail: http://tinyurl.com/ywma3 - Summary of my vision for Fedora Triage http://tinyurl.com/23alw - My short term goals and long term plans -jef"technically I got this email out on Tuesday"spaleta

1 0

rebuild gcc rpm on x86_64
by Gene C. 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

Can someone explain the logic to me why you need the i386 version of glibc-devel installed on a x86_64 system in order to rebuild gcc for the x86_64? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113893 Besides the man and info files which are duplicates of the ones in the x86_64 glibc-devel package, the i386 package only contains files in /usr/lib. Yes, I am going to go and try to install it but I am sure bothered as to why. An additional issue is that the i386 glibc-devel is not part of the FC1 x86_64 test1 distribution (only glibc for the i686). Shouldn't I be able to rebuild any package in a distribution given only the packages contained in the distribution? Do I need the i386 version of glibc-devel to rebuild on the sparc? How about the IA64 Itanium? -- Gene

2 2

up2date on x86_64
by Gene C. 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

Has anyone successfully run up2date on x86_64 test1? I have set up local trees for x86_64 updates. I have done the same thing for my i686 and athon systems and usually download all updates packages once and then use up2date to apply them to my collection of i686 and Athlon systems (some of which are everything installs). I setup a similar situation for x86_64 but up2date seems to hang after it gets the headers. I ran up2date as root from a console and got no tracebacks so there is not much to bugzilla. -- Gene

3 3

emachines laptop
by Bruce Gallemore 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

Message: 12 From: "Gene C." <czar(a)czarc.net> To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: fedora x86_64 troubles Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:04:17 -0500 Reply-To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com On Monday 26 January 2004 08:30, Justin M. Forbes wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 11:33:23PM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote: > > I had the same problem on the eMachines laptop- solved by hooking up a > > USB keyboard. The problem seems to go away after the first media check > > screen. Still unsure why. > > I picked up one of these laptops to use for testing, since I needed a new > laptop anyway... It should arrive today, and I will see what I can do. I see these laptops come with 512MB ram. Can you add more memory? -- Gene It will hold up to 2GB PC2700. Beware the 802.11g is by Broadcom so the wireless will probably not work. Bruce

3 3

Zmailer-2.99.56
by MW Mike Weiner (5028) 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

Does any one happen to have an RPM for zmailer handy that compiles/runs under Fedora Core 1 (preferably version 2.99.56)? Thanks in advance Michael Weiner

2 1

Updated Fedora Core 1 testing kernel.
by Dave Jones 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora Update Notification FEDORA-2003-056 2004-01-16 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Name : kernel Version : 2.4.22 Release : 1.2163.nptl Summary : The Linux kernel (the core of the Linux operating system) Description : The kernel package contains the Linux kernel (vmlinuz), the core of your Fedora Core Linux operating system. The kernel handles the basic functions of the operating system: memory allocation, process allocation, device input and output, etc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Fri Jan 16 2004 Dave Jones <davej(a)redhat.com> - Merge VM updates from post 2.4.22 - Fix AMD64 ptrace security hole. (CAN-2004-0001) - Fix NPTL SMP hang. - Merge bits from 2.4.25pre - R128 DRI limits checking. (CAN-2004-0003) - Various ymfpci fixes. - tmpfs readdir does not update dir atime - Minor IPV4/Netfilter changes. - Merge a few more bits from 2.4.23pre - Numerous tmpfs fixes. - Use list_add_tail in buffer_insert_list - Correctly dequeue SIGSTOP signals in kupdated - Update laptop-mode patch to match mainline. * Wed Jan 14 2004 Dave Jones <davej(a)redhat.com> - Merge a few more missing netfilter fixes from upstream. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This update can be downloaded from: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/1/ a64fe6c46db3d02942053ad6714a78a9 SRPMS/kernel-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.src.rpm 07a6ab17a501cfe70e34feb2d2d3fc27 i386/kernel-source-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i386.rpm 64e7db9af6962788c37ad05a6b69017f i386/kernel-doc-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i386.rpm 7c40cfde76711bb2d414a59adbdd9db4 i386/kernel-BOOT-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i386.rpm 2ca7ce2620f5ab9d054b12e0de9d0b6c i386/debug/kernel-debuginfo-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i386.rpm e9992854aae4a8bb2e8f2caf6bc861f2 i386/kernel-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i586.rpm 8c45b50f59132c754dacf764b6bf8037 i386/debug/kernel-debuginfo-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i586.rpm 7cb9fe03b7e07404a7704161981c3070 i386/kernel-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i686.rpm 3d5e7beb510920c159ed8a867214a7ea i386/kernel-smp-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i686.rpm b01dd91605f405b7b22f01e25ee48a20 i386/debug/kernel-debuginfo-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.i686.rpm 3b474cfd9d60bf542f7134bc35753c24 i386/kernel-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.athlon.rpm 6c9b62885425d694dd51de0195ca65c9 i386/kernel-smp-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.athlon.rpm 1746c98fa1801f002aff5e36da437ff0 i386/debug/kernel-debuginfo-2.4.22-1.2163.nptl.athlon.rpm This update can also be installed with the Update Agent; you can launch the Update Agent with the 'up2date' command. ---------------------------------------------------------------------

5 12

kernel-2.6.1 - initio module missing
by Walter Gray 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

I tried to install the newest test kernel for Fedora-2 and get the following error: % rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.1-1.57.i686.rpm warning: kernel-2.6.1-1.57.i686.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 30c9ecf8 Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:kernel ########################################### [100%] No module initio found for kernel 2.6.1-1.57, aborting. mkinitrd failed The module is not present but appears to be in the source tree. Thanks. ...w...

3 2

fedora x86_64 troubles
by Aleksander Demko 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

Has anyone tried the 0.96 discs on an IBM eserver 325? When I boot the install cdrom in mine, I get 1 or 2 (what look like) register dumps, yet the install continues. However, when it gets to screen about cdrom testing, my keyboard input seems to have no effect. I could try to get detailed information, if anyone is interested. This machine is a dual opteron with 6 gigs of ram, a scsi disk and a usb keyboard and mouse. I've had the mandrake alpha and some other fedora tests running, with varying levels of success. Stock 32 bit fedora 1 runs fine, ofcourse. -- // scopira.org | ninjacoder.com //

5 7

Re: emachines laptop
by Mike Larkin 27 Jan '04

27 Jan '04

The 2nd dimm slot is internal, inside the system (but I did confirm with the eMachines rep that there really is a dimm in there, it's not some RAM soldered on the system board). It's not a field/user-replacable module. :( Hence, unless you want to void the warranty, you've got to send it to eMachines and get an RMA for them to install the memory for you. That's not good news, but at least they offered to do it for me under warranty. As for the drive, it's a 60GB Toshiba 6021GAS, 4200RPM and 2MB cache (low end unit). I can't try the memory suggestion without replacing both modules, so even if I were to do that, it would be a while before I could comment on the effect.... I can however say that the clock speed is not 2GHz but rather 1.8GHz.. 3 different OSes all report 1.8GHz. On another subject - is AMD64 ACPI any better under 2.6.1? Because without ACPI for power management, you only get about 1 hr battery life under FC1, while with Win32 ACPI battery management, it's closer to 3 hours. -ml Brian Stretch wrote: >>Still looking for the second dimm slot.. So far, I've only found 1, >>which means that the max would be 1.25GB.. The door on the >>bottom of the laptop only exposes a single slot. >> >> > >Try emailing eMachines. They've been very good about replying >to emails I've sent to them within hours. I don't always get the >answer I want but they do appear cluefull. Be sure to tell them >to smack Broadcom while you're at it. > >Still, I'm disappointed they didn't document how to get to both >DIMM slots in print. There's probably info in the online docs >under Windows that you can't get to. > >I have a suspicion that if you dropped in Corsair PC3200 SODIMMs >in place of the included PC2700's you could tweak the BIOS for >400MHz memory and effectively have an Athlon 64 3200+. The >specs they list, 1MB L2 and 2GHz clock, match those for a 3200+ >with PC3200 memory. Using PC2700 subtracts 200 points on the >TPI scale. I guess PC3200 SODIMMs were too hard to find in >quantity? Just speculating here. Newegg.com has the Corsair >SODIMMs. > >BTW, is the included HD a 4200RPM drive or 5400? 2MB cache or >8MB? I haven't bought a notebook yet but when I come up with a >proper excuse I'm planning on getting an eMachines 64-bit. > >

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
11
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test January 2004