#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue -------------------------+------------------ Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: permissions | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -------------------------+------------------ = phenomenon =
Long story short, atodorov is helping with the beaker trial we're doing and he needs shell access to the machine in order to complete his work.
Assuming that this trial is successful, access to the beaker system(s) will be controlled with a separate FAS group but until that is set up, sysadmin-qa membership is the only way to get the required access.
I don't expect the need for membership to last any more than a couple of weeks.
#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue --------------------------+----------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: permissions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+-----------------
Comment (by tflink):
added and sponsored into sysadmin-qa. I'm leaving this ticket open while membership is active. Will close when membership has been moved to the future beaker sysadmin group
#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue --------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: permissions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+-------------------- Changes (by tflink):
* owner: => tflink
#429: temporary membership in sysadmin-qa for atodorov so that beaker trial can continue --------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: permissions | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: --------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by adamwill):
is this still valid?