February 2009 - triage - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 247065] Initscript Review
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247065 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|john(a)ncphotography.com |limb(a)jcomserv.net --- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 14:21:32 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 248408] Applet doesn't list running KVM domains
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248408 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kzak(a)redhat.com |crobinso(a)redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 12:24:44 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228902] SELinux: fine grained enforcement of sysfs objects
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Feb '09

11 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228902 James Morris <jmorris(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmorris(a)redhat.com --- Comment #5 from James Morris <jmorris(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-11 04:32:37 EDT --- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 230181] anaconda identifies multiple drives as a multipath
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230181 randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randy.galbraith(a)cox.net --- Comment #11 from randygalbraith <randy.galbraith(a)cox.net> 2009-02-10 21:15:53 EDT --- FWIW: The comments in this bug regarding the "nompath" option (thank you!) helped me work around this very issue with my Fedora 10 install yesterday (February 9, 2009). Until I ran the install with the nompath option I could not get Fedora to see my two 320gb SATA Maxstor drives. I tried various BIOS settings and the nodmraid option which did not work. I even dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd[ab] when someone suggested "meta data" on the drives may be leading Fedora install program to only suggest /dev/mapper option. -Randy Galbraith -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk --- Comment #31 from Nigel Jones <bugs(a)cherrybyte.me.uk> 2009-02-10 14:54:36 EDT --- I'm getting this problem too. In my case it was occuring in F10, and is still occuring in rawhide Same as above: (from yum output) Installing : kernel 48/178 grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template Installing : kernel-PAE 49/178 grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template I think my sym link is ok sh-4.0# ls -la menu.lst lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2008-11-06 20:04 menu.lst -> ./grub.conf My current menu.lst is # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/VolGroup00/rootlv # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora 11 (2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE ro nomodeset quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.29-0.96.rc3.git12.fc11.i686.PAE.img I have to update menu.lst manually each time. Tedious on rawhide :-( COuld really do at least with grubby reporting a more useful error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 246674] Screensaver activates when only second head is being used.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246674 Peter Doherty <doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu --- Comment #13 from Peter Doherty <doherty(a)crystal.harvard.edu> 2009-02-10 12:34:56 EDT --- What's the status with this bug? Is anyone working on it? It seems to me that this is a pretty serious issue, that is being ignored for over a year now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #5 from Jörg Schilling <joerg.schilling(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> 2009-02-10 10:52:59 EDT --- The original isoinfo has proper UTF-8 and iconv support. Just use recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #27 from Jarod Wilson <jwilson(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-10 09:06:23 EDT --- Yep, I managed to acquire a Pismo a while back, and was able to observe similar behavior. I loaned the machine to someone else for some X-related stuff, and forgot all about it, need to go get it back from them, and with luck, I'll have some time soon to try to debug this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '09

10 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #26 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-10 03:13:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Endless repetition of "self ID complete" events could be caused by > firewire-ohci lacking a workaround for Uninorth v1 to break out of bus reset > loops (but then I would rather expect endless bus reset events without self ID > complete events), or could simply be a sign of dying hardware. I suppose, too, that there is some special treatment for the Uninorth v1 required. I don't think, that it's a hardware problem. The same FW hard disk is working correctly under Mac OSX (on the same Pismo) and on my second system (x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 247204] [PATCH] cifs / smbfs, mount error 20, NAS device only supports smb
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247204 Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #201661|text/x-patch |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #201661|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 186481] Creation of a new wireless network via NM should not have a 'connect' button in order to implement, nor should it tell you that it's trying to join a network
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186481 Suzanne Hillman <shillman(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|5 |9 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Suzanne Hillman <shillman(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 16:19:37 EDT --- NM still has 'connect' as the 'ok' option when creating a new network, and still claims to be trying to connect to a network, in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon(a)redhat.com |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #13 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 13:45:19 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #25 from Stefan Richter <stefan-r-rhbz(a)s5r6.in-berlin.de> 2009-02-09 13:22:23 EDT --- Endless repetition of "self ID complete" events could be caused by firewire-ohci lacking a workaround for Uninorth v1 to break out of bus reset loops (but then I would rather expect endless bus reset events without self ID complete events), or could simply be a sign of dying hardware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189070] gFTP has outdated localization files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Feb '09

09 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189070 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|caillon(a)redhat.com |itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-09 13:13:51 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242386] Xorg burns CPU cycles, making desktop sluggish
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242386 Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz --- Comment #23 from Milos Jakubicek <xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz> 2009-02-08 14:49:47 EDT --- I have exactly the same problem with a laptop where this did NOT occur on F7-F9. After an upgrade to F10, the computer is hardly usable. It uses the radeon driver with AIGLX and Composite options set to "on" in xorg.conf (disabling them doesn't take any effect, nor adding the options mentioned in comment #15). The smolt profile of that machine is here: http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_d482fdbf-1991-4155-8144-bae766035dd0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #24 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-08 14:16:37 EDT --- Yes, I still have the hardware and I created a second fresh Fedora 10 system on my Pismo, without any changes in the configuration etc. So the kernel version is 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 The only thing I manually did was: rmmod firewire_ohci modprobe firewire_ohci debug=7 modprobe firewire_sbp2 (firewire_core is also loaded) firewire_ohci gave the following in the kernel log during modprobe: Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0002:24:0e.0, OHCI version 1.0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010010 selfID AR_req Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 1 selfIDs, generation 1, local node ID ffc0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8c52, phy 0 [--.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 1 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_core: created device fw0: GUID 003065fffe3f9f74, S400 When plugging in my external FW drive I get repeatedly from firewire_ohci: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00000010 AR_req Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010000 selfID Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 2 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 2 selfIDs, generation 2, local node ID ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8490, phy 0 [p-.] S400 gc=63 -3W L Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 817f8cd2, phy 1 [c-.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci and from firewire_core: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc1, gap_count=5 ... Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: giving up on config rom for node id ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc0, gap_count=5 The last message (changing sometimes from root=ffc0 to root=ffc1 and back) and the firewire_ohci messages are repeated until I remove the FW device. No message from firewire_sbp2. Does anybody have an idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #23 from Helmut Schlattl <helmut.schlattl(a)web.de> 2009-02-08 14:15:31 EDT --- Yes, I still have the hardware and I created a second fresh Fedora 10 system on my Pismo, without any changes in the configuration etc. So the kernel version is 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10 The only thing I manually did was: rmmod firewire_ohci modprobe firewire_ohci debug=7 modprobe firewire_sbp2 (firewire_core is also loaded) firewire_ohci gave the following in the kernel log during modprobe: Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0002:24:0e.0, OHCI version 1.0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010010 selfID AR_req Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 1 selfIDs, generation 1, local node ID ffc0 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8c52, phy 0 [--.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 1 Feb 8 19:23:26 *** kernel: firewire_core: created device fw0: GUID 003065fffe3f9f74, S400 When plugging in my external FW drive I get repeatedly from firewire_ohci: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00000010 AR_req Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: IRQ 00010000 selfID Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: AR evt_bus_reset, generation 2 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: 2 selfIDs, generation 2, local node ID ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 807f8490, phy 0 [p-.] S400 gc=63 -3W L Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_ohci: selfID 0: 817f8cd2, phy 1 [c-.] S400 gc=63 -3W Lci and from firewire_core: Feb 8 19:26:04 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc1, gap_count=5 ... Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: giving up on config rom for node id ffc1 Feb 8 19:26:34 *** kernel: firewire_core: phy config: card 0, new root=ffc0, gap_count=5 The last message (changing sometimes from root=ffc0 to root=ffc1 and back) and the firewire_ohci messages are repeated until I remove the FW device. No message from firewire_sbp2. Does somebody has an idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 235625] Clicking close button in Firefox crashes X nv driver
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235625 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222945] dual video card config doesn't work (No matching Device section for instance)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222945 --- Comment #16 from Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-08 12:51:54 EDT --- Backtrace: 0: /usr/bin/Xorg(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c9bd1] 1: [0xe08420] 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/r128_drv.so(R128FreeScreen+0x2b) [0x20c61b] 3: /usr/bin/Xorg(xf86DeleteScreen+0x6e) [0x80c104e] 4: /usr/bin/Xorg(InitOutput+0x865) [0x80a1b55] 5: /usr/bin/Xorg(main+0x276) [0x806f856] 6: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x811f2c] 7: /usr/bin/Xorg(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0x1e9) [0x806eda1] Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 222945] dual video card config doesn't work (No matching Device section for instance)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Feb '09

08 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222945 Matej Cepl <mcepl(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-07 19:32:31 EDT --- Actually I forgot to remove the --auto-ghci-libs from ghc-pkg update in %post so this build will not actually fix the problem. :-( It should be fixed already in ghc-gtk2hs-0.10.0-0.1.fc11 in rawhide though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 242607] Build with festival error.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 17:23:18 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Feb '09

07 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-02-07 17:18:58 EDT --- ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10, ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-2.fc10, haddock-2.4.1-2.fc10, ghc-gtk2hs-0.9.13-8.20081108.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc ghc-paths haddock ghc-gtk2hs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage February 2009