triage March 2009

triage@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
112 discussions

[Bug 483777] New: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777 Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: festival AssignedTo: davidz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mattdm(a)mattdm.org, skasal(a)redhat.com, thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de, tim(a)niemueller.de, mclasen(a)redhat.com, davidz(a)redhat.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com, robert.zhangle(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, schiffer(a)cs.rwth-aachen.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 242607 Created an attachment (id=330741) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330741) rpmlint on installed festival package +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #242607 +++ --- Additional comment from kwizart(a)gmail.com on 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 440580] New: no gpm mouse support in mc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Dec '09

16 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mc AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh- bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++ Description of problem: Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm, so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad, unless I am missing something obvious. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5 How reproducible: Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 456393] New: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++ Description of problem: Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 481147] New: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '09

12 May '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: cpan2rpm AssignedTo: gavin.henry(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: gavin.brown(a)uk.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, gavin.henry(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 279251 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #279251 +++ Description of problem: The latest version of Pod::Text from CPAN is from RRA/podlators-2.2.2.tar.gz Pod::Text no longer derives from Pod::Parser so the method 'interpolate' does not exist. As near as I can tell, this is the only method used in cpan2rpm, so Pod::Text can be changed to Pod::Parser in the two places it appears. This is what I did locally and it now works for me. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc8.1.noarch How reproducible: update Pod::Text via cpan. Run cpan2rpm for some module (any will do...) Actual results: [...] -- module: /var/cache/cpan/build/libwww-perl-5.808-baHtIL -- Metadata retrieval Can't locate object method "interpolate" via package "Pod::Text" at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 522. -- Done -- Expected results: No failure from above. Additional info: --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-14 10:14:55 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-06-16 22:19:58 EDT --- Fedora 7 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on June 13, 2008. Fedora 7 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 213882] Not calculating space for partitions properly when reusing existing partitions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213882 Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(orion(a)cora.nwra.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Chris Lumens <clumens(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-31 15:56:22 EDT --- As you know, we've now gotten the massive storage rewrite in for F11 beta. Is this any better with that release? If not, we probably stand a much better chance of getting it fixed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 233833] esc: unowned directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Mar '09

31 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233833 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 219750] Hotplug script not working in gpsd package.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219750 Bug 219750 depends on bug 491018, which changed state. Bug 491018 Summary: gpsd 2.39 is now released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.8.50.20090302-13.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-30 15:42:54 EDT --- In FSF GDB HEAD and in Rawhide: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-03/msg00093.html gdb/ * stack.c (return_command <retval_exp>): New variables retval_expr and old_chain. Inline parse_and_eval to initialize retval_expr. Check RETVAL_EXPR for UNOP_CAST and set RETURN_TYPE to the RETURN_VALUE type if RETURN_TYPE is NULL. gdb/doc/ * gdb.texinfo (Returning): New description for missing debug info. gdb/testsuite/ * gdb.base/return-nodebug.exp, gdb.base/return-nodebug.c: New. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237421] Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 --- Comment #9 from Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-30 11:57:05 EDT --- perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11 should appear in rawhide tomorrow. Still working on a fix for Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237421] Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Mar '09

30 Mar '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|steve(a)silug.org |skasal(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage March 2009