August 2009 - triage - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 483777] New: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483777 Summary: lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol with festival Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: festival AssignedTo: davidz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: mattdm(a)mattdm.org, skasal(a)redhat.com, thomas.moschny(a)gmx.de, tim(a)niemueller.de, mclasen(a)redhat.com, davidz(a)redhat.com, kwizart(a)gmail.com, robert.zhangle(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, schiffer(a)cs.rwth-aachen.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 242607 Created an attachment (id=330741) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330741) rpmlint on installed festival package +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #242607 +++ --- Additional comment from kwizart(a)gmail.com on 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 499204] New: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499204 Summary: Hardware freezes on Dell Optiplex 320 while booting Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: bzcl34nup Severity: high Priority: low Component: grub AssignedTo: pjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: d_preston215(a)yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: pjones(a)redhat.com, tomc(a)kendeco.com, pawsa(a)theochem.kth.se, craigwhite(a)azapple.com, ajn(a)ite.gmu.edu, z(a)canteiros.org, kelsey(a)kelseyhightower.net, eric.caron(a)gmail.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com, linux-bugs(a)dell.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 219715 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219715 +++ Description of problem: The machine, an Dell Optiplex 320, freezes while booting with grub. It seems to happen while the kernel is being loaded and before the kernel is started. Our guess is a bug in the BIOS that grub tickles. Booting with lilo works. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): grub-0.97-13.i386 The machine has the most recent version of the BIOS, 1.0.9. The command "blocklist /vmlinuz-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6" from the grub command-line also freezes the machine. --- Additional comment from ackistler(a)yahoo.com on 2007-01-20 20:47:13 EDT --- I have the same hardware, although I'm trying fc5 currently. Going to the grub command line, I can execute "cat /grub/menu.lst" and get the contents of the file displayed. (Of course, the menu is displayed on boot, too, so I expected cat to work.) However, on a manual attempt to boot, the kernel command freezes the machine. The Optiplex 320 has an ATI sb600 SATA controller, if that matters. I had to supply all-generic-ide to the installer to get it to run, but it ran. I'll post back here if my fc6 experience is different. --- Additional comment from pawsa(a)theochem.kth.se on 2007-03-26 13:46:12 EDT --- I see the bug on the same hardware (Dell Optiplex 320) with FC6 as well. "Uncompressing xxxx" is the last message I see. No combination of command line options that I tried (noprobe, noapic and so on) could fix it. Replacing the grub bootloader with lilo makes the problem disappear. This is seen with fc6 + all the updates installed allready in the installation phase: 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 kernel is being booted. --- Additional comment from kelsey(a)kelseyhightower.net on 2007-07-05 11:53:37 EDT --- I have this same machine. I am running RHEL 5 Workstation. I was able to get the machine to install, passing pci=nomsi as a kernel option. Everything installs fine, but the machine will not boot with its default boot loader GRUB. I have to use a rescue disk to install LILO overwriteing GRUB. I have since added a PCI SATA controller which allows the system to install without using the pci=nomsi option. I still get errors with the GRUB booting the Linux kernel. There seems to be conflict with GRUB and the BIOS, as LILO works and GRUB does not. Is this a issue that RedHat plans to address? Will they try and patch GRUB to work on these machines? Thanks for any feedback. --- Additional comment from matt_domsch(a)dell.com on 2007-07-24 14:58:34 EDT --- Has anyone tried passing 'edd=skipmbr' as a kernel option? Just curious... -Matt --- Additional comment from pawsa-gpa(a)theochem.kth.se on 2007-08-07 06:19:52 EDT --- I have just tried edd=skipmbr instead of pci=nomsi - and the kernel hangs just after the detection of the USB keyboard. Kernel version is 2.6.18-1.8.el5. I obviously booted with lilo - grub is nonfunctional in any form. --- Additional comment from eric.caron(a)gmail.com on 2007-09-07 13:33:44 EDT --- This bug still exists in Fedora 7. Its very hard to install on a new Optiplex 320. Installing Lilo presents its own issues because of DEVMAPPER-related issues, and grub2 doesn't appear to fix it either. --- Additional comment from eric.caron(a)gmail.com on 2007-09-07 15:47:56 EDT --- Interesting revelation... When I add "vga=792" to grub.conf, and boot from the CD and then choose "Boot from local disk" (which then loads grub from sda), the system boots perfectly. Does that help in addressing the issue? --- Additional comment from lkundrak(a)redhat.com on 2007-10-15 11:19:10 EDT --- Are you confident this is a Grub issue, not a Kernel one? Are any kernel guys in CC? Could you please run dmidecode to find out what BIOS version do you have? Are there any BIOS updates available for the machine? Did you try applying them? --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2007-10-15 17:26:54 EDT --- I am pretty sure this is a Grub problem. It hangs before it prints the first kernel message. It also hangs when doing a "blocklist" command after printing a handful of blocks. I last tried Grub with BIOS version 1.1.7. There is a more recent version (1.1.10) that I haven't tried grub with. I also tried lilo with the lba32 option, and grub with forcelba option, thinking it might be a problem with LBA32 support but lilo worked regardless and grub hung. --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2007-10-19 13:47:21 EDT --- I upgraded the BIOS to version 1.1.10 and still has the Grub hang problem. --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:32:52 EDT --- Nothing has changed on Fedora 8 - in fact, it's gotten worse. I could use Fedora 7 x86_64 without any special boot parameters but of course, grub never worked but lilo has indeed worked. All of my mentions here refer only to x86_64 as I gave up trying to run i386 on these systems a while back. Upgraded to Fedora 8 and simply cannot even boot from Rescue disc - it hangs with an error... PCI: MSI quirk detected. MSI deactivated pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5 ACPI Exception (processor_core-0819): AE_NOT_FOUND, Processor Device is not present [20070126] *** last line repeats 2 more times *** Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac Non-volatile memory driver v1.2 Linux apgart interface v0.102 Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled and there it stops...never proceeds. The only way I've been able to get Fedora 8 Linux Rescue CD or CD Image from boot.iso to boot is to pass 'acpi=off' I will attach dmidecode and lspci --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:33:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=256041) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=256041) output of dmidecode on Dell Optiplex 320 --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:34:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=256051) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=256051) output of lspci -vv from Dell Optiplex 320 --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-12 18:40:40 EDT --- I'm gonna vent a bit here... This isn't getting fixed. See bugzilla 219043 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219043 This all began on Fedora 5 (Fedora 6 for me) and continued on Fedora 7 and now has gotten worse in Fedora 8 Grub has NEVER worked on these Dell Optiplexes...as far as I can tell, for anyone ever. I am using Lilo-22.8 I could get i386 working only if I passed ridiculous kernel parameters such as pci=nomsi all-generic-ide but until Fedora 8 (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) I didn't have to sacrifice the unborn on x86_64. Now it requires both Lilo and apci=off PLEASE - PLEASE - PLEASE do something --- Additional comment from lkundrak(a)redhat.com on 2007-11-12 19:27:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The only way I've been able to get Fedora 8 Linux Rescue CD or CD Image from > boot.iso to boot is to pass 'acpi=off' (In reply to comment #14) > I could get i386 working only if I passed ridiculous kernel parameters such as > pci=nomsi all-generic-ide but until Fedora 8 (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) I didn't have to > sacrifice the unborn on x86_64. Now it requires both Lilo and apci=off This is a kernel thing. Hopefully kernel people will be able to do more than us, bug #379201 for the kernel part. --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-14 14:27:54 EDT --- OK - primarily concentrating on grub issues then, I have lilo installed and I can get it to boot - kernel params per kernel-tracking bugzilla are now 'pci=noacpi timesource=acpi_pm' lilo works but I have to manually run lilo command after each kernel update grub as has been widely reported never seems to work on these systems. I have updated BIOS to latest - here is latest output of dmidecode... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=258581 # grub-install /dev/sda Installation finished. No error reported. This is the contents of the device map /boot/grub/device.map. Check if this is correct or not. If any of the lines is incorrect, fix it and re-run the script `grub-install'. # this device map was generated by anaconda (hd0) /dev/sda # cat /boot/grub/grub.conf # grub.conf generated by anaconda # ...snip... #boot=/dev/sda default=0 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora (2.6.23.1-49.fc8) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.23.1-49.fc8 ro root=LABEL=/1 pci=noacpi timesource=acpi_pm initrd /initrd-2.6.23.1-49.fc8.img This will never boot and I have to reinstall lilo again. Is my process correct? --- Additional comment from craigwhite(a)azapple.com on 2007-11-21 14:08:00 EDT --- I recognize that the inability to boot on 2.6.23 kernel (Fedora 8) issue is probably more likely to be solved by bugzilla 379201 in kernel-maint but... grub still doesn't work on these systems - at least no one has reported success with getting it to boot. Lilo boots but I can't install kernel updates without manually running 'lilo -v' because grubby code is uncooperative. On fedora-list yesterday... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-November/msg03487.html poster suggests that grub2 worked for him --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-04 01:15:01 EDT --- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2008-04-04 13:22:35 EDT --- This problem still occurs with Fedora 8 and the most recent version of grub, 0.97-19.i386. I am using the most recent BIOS update, 1.1.11, for the Optiplex 320. The machine still hangs while grub is booting the machine. --- Additional comment from poelstra(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-06 15:54:35 EDT --- thanks for the update. changing to ASSIGNED --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-11-26 02:07:26 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2009-01-09 02:02:26 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 513800] New: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '10

05 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513800 Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: kexec-kdump AssignedTo: vgoyal(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com QAContact: lwang(a)redhat.com CC: matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 239244 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #239244 +++ Description of problem: After getting some kernel problems, I finally decided to give kdump a try, but to my surprise, it does not work. Any attempt to use kdump (with sysrq-c or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger) leads to instant system crash. sysrq does not work anymore at this point and the only solution is hard poweroff. I see that FC7 does not ship kernel-kdump package anymore, but since FC7 kernel is built with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE, it should be fine as kdump kernel I presume. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.6.21-1.3116.fc7 How reproducible: 100% reproducible. Steps to Reproduce: boot kernel with crashkernel=128M@16M option run service kdump start run sysctl kernel.sysrq=1 press sysrq-t or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger Additional info: The system is DELL Latitude D620 laptop with Intel Core2 Duo T7200 CPU, 2G RAM, i686 arch. Latest FC7 stuff from development repo. --- Additional comment from green(a)linuxhacker.ru on 2007-05-14 15:24:47 EDT --- I upgraded to 2.6.21-1.3142.fc7 and the problem is still present. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-04-03 20:33:50 EDT --- Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com on 2008-05-06 21:41:26 EDT --- This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp --- Additional comment from matt.castelein(a)rocsoft.com on 2009-07-24 19:47:31 EDT --- I have encountered this problem on Fedora 11. I am following the instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel/kdump.. When I get to the point where I do "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" the box just freezes and no dump kernel is loaded. It just sits there until I reset it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 440580] New: no gpm mouse support in mc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '09

15 Dec '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 Summary: no gpm mouse support in mc Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mc AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stsp(a)aknet.ru QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com,leonard-rh- bugzilla@den.ottolander.nl,stsp@aknet.ru +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #194593 +++ Description of problem: Mouse doesn't work in mc. "ldd /usr/bin/mc" doesn't list libgpm, so the mouse obviously is not expeced to work. This is quite bad, unless I am missing something obvious. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mc-4.6.1a-13.FC5 How reproducible: Press the left mouse button and move the mouse. Only the gpm text selection happens. You can't go to menu or move the mc cursor with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 8

[Bug 456393] New: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '09

21 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Summary: RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgf/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: texlive-texmf AssignedTo: jnovy(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: uckelman(a)nomic.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,fedora-triage- list@redhat.com,pertusus@free.fr +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #219146 +++ Description of problem: Version 1.10 of pgf is packaged with texlive; the current version of pgf (2.0) is two years newer and has far more features. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-texmf-2007-22.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 7

[Bug 504899] New: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Oct '09

12 Oct '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504899 Summary: mailx man page description doesn't match mailx implementation Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mailx AssignedTo: varekova(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat3(a)zacglen.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: p.van.egdom(a)gmail.com, redhat3(a)zacglen.com, dmitry(a)butskoy.name, varekova(a)redhat.com, fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 188313 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #188313 +++ Description of problem: The options for mailx descriped in the mailx man page does not match the implementation of mailx. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mailx-12.4-1 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. run "man mailx" 2. use that information to try to use /bin/mailx 3. Actual results: Many options fail. For example, the "-e" option is described in the man page, but running "mailx -e" produces: mailx: invalid option -- e Usage: mail [-iInv] [-s subject] [-c cc-addr] [-b bcc-addr] to-addr ... [-- sendmail-options ...] mail [-iInNv] -f [name] mail [-iInNv] [-u user] Expected results: The options described in the mailx man page should match what the mailx program accepts. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Aug '09

30 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org> 2009-08-30 03:47:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is this package still maintained by upstream? No. There is a later version that doesn't suffer from this bug but there is no version later than 4.4.0 that has a GUI that works in Fedora. Upstream is now closed-source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Aug '09

29 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 --- Comment #9 from Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-29 17:52:35 EDT --- Is this package still maintained by upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 189660] Emblems have no localized name
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Aug '09

29 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189660 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen(a)redhat.com Component|redhat-artwork |gtk2 AssignedTo|davidz(a)redhat.com |mclasen(a)redhat.com QAContact| |extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-29 14:58:08 EDT --- If anything, this probably needs to be handled in gtk somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 427065] Show an explanation when hibernating / suspending fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Aug '09

29 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427065 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 179072] _dl_debug_state() RT_CONSISTENT called too early
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Aug '09

27 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179072 Masao Takahashi <masao-takahashi(a)kanno.co.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |masao-takahashi(a)kanno.co.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '09

26 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.9-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Aug '09

26 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-08-26 22:12:56 EDT --- system-config-lvm-1.1.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225507] nfsnobody == 4294967294 causes idmapd to stop responding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225507 --- Comment #8 from Harald Klein <hklein(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-25 13:00:39 EDT --- We've tested 2.6.18-157 with the patch from #7 applied, fixes the issue. br, Hari -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 320681] Midnight Commander default installation please
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320681 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 300321] gnome screensaver does not detect input when fullscreen sdl game is running
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300321 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 207470] Need ability to handle duplicate VG names for Xen
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207470 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 145892] mqueue filesystem must be mounted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=145892 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 301271] gettext.py and the Plural-Forms header
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301271 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:59:46 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 285631] optparse isn't friendly to i18n/unicode
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285631 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:59:09 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 250782] curses module lacks unicode support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250782 Jeremy Katz <katzj(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj(a)redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208383] mkinitrd/iSCSI - only probe for network device if not already specified
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208383 Alexander Todorov <atodorov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atodorov(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Alexander Todorov <atodorov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atodorov(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199812] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [ffff81007ffa6810] 'on' is spewed repeatedly on the console
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Aug '09

24 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199812 --- Comment #39 from Andrew Ziem <ahz001(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-24 18:19:27 EDT --- faith: I am 90% sure the ACPI messages are unrelated (they don't cause the symptom of not being able to start the system), so you need to focus somewhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199812] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [ffff81007ffa6810] 'on' is spewed repeatedly on the console
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Aug '09

23 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199812 --- Comment #38 from faith <faithinfamilies(a)yahoo.com> 2009-08-23 09:35:13 EDT --- SOMEBODY??? ANYBODY??? It's been 15 days since I reported this. Really need to get my Compaq working again. HELP?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 219540] glest not playable at powerpc-arch
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219540 Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gauret(a)free.fr |bruno(a)wolff.to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 219540] glest not playable at powerpc-arch
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219540 --- Comment #11 from Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> 2009-08-22 21:48:03 EDT --- ppc builds have been turned off for a long time and I'd like to have someone who can, retest to see if ppc builds are still unplayable. 3.2.2 is available for ppc/ppc64 in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 219540] glest not playable at powerpc-arch
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219540 Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno(a)wolff.to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-08-21 21:02:09 EDT --- system-config-lvm-1.1.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update system-config-lvm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 346271] halt initscript does not properly handle apcupsd shutdowns
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346271 --- Comment #24 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-21 07:08:24 EDT --- bad news, fesco has disapproved static linking of apcupsd with explanation that separate /usr is not supported. But working init script for cases where /usr is not a separated partition is still needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 215927] add a template for R packages?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215927 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |7.4-1 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta(a)iki.fi> 2009-08-21 06:05:26 EDT --- No feedback, included anyway in 7.4-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356221] gnome-power-manager does not save changes made to certain settings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356221 --- Comment #11 from Y-H Chen <myaverageorange(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-21 01:59:47 EDT --- Looks like there is still a little work to be done. My computer just went to sleep even though I was using it. Display had been asleep, I came back, logged back in, and the computer went to sleep several minutes later. Earlier in the evening, the display went to sleep even though the computer was not idle. Let me know if there's any additional information I can provide and/or whether I should file a new bug report... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356221] gnome-power-manager does not save changes made to certain settings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356221 --- Comment #10 from Y-H Chen <myaverageorange(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-21 00:24:39 EDT --- The most recent update of gnome-power-manager seems to have fixed this. Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-08-20 19:00:53 EDT --- system-config-lvm-1.1.9-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-lvm-1.1.9-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #48 from Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-20 11:00:15 EDT --- Seems like we could use more debugging output when this happens; there is likely more than one root cause. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Marek Grac <mgrac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|POST |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-08-20 09:03:50 EDT --- system-config-lvm-1.1.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-lvm-1.1.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #47 from Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu(a)irc.pl> 2009-08-20 09:01:14 EDT --- Problem still persist in current rawhide: (yum upgrade): Instalowanie : kernel-2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.x86_64 4/8 grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template grubby-7.0.2-1.fc12.x86_64 dracut-0.9-1.fc12.noarch mount output: /dev/sda2 on / type btrfs (rw) blkid output: /dev/sda1: UUID="57f8b94e-dc62-42bf-96fd-b17c40bc0b53" SEC_TYPE="ext2" TYPE="ext3" /dev/sda2: LABEL="lnx_test" UUID="0af52868-6378-4511-ac3f-8076caca907d" TYPE="btrfs" UUID_SUB="c1cbea8e-f38d-4f2e-abef-3da6a9239346" fstab: UUID=0af52868-6378-4511-ac3f-8076caca907d / btrfs defaults 1 1 grub/menu.lst: title Fedora (2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64 ro root=UUID=0af52868-6378-4511-ac3f-8076caca907d fastboot initrd /initrd-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64.img -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220962] laptop hibernates when secondary battery runs out; primary battery still full
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220962 Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |rhughes(a)redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-20 08:17:20 EDT --- This is fixed in rawhide. See http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/06/16/gnome-power-manager-and-multiple-… for more details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 427065] Show an explanation when hibernating / suspending fails
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427065 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:04:37 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-20 07:40:33 EDT --- We should get much better reports from rawhide -- can you confirm the failure message is okay now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 356221] gnome-power-manager does not save changes made to certain settings
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356221 Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |rhughes(a)redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Richard Hughes <rhughes(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-20 07:39:56 EDT --- The original problem (and the blanking problem) should now be fixed in F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Marek Grac <mgrac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Aug '09

20 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 --- Comment #6 from Marek Grac <mgrac(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-20 07:04:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358065) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358065) Proposed patch Snapshot cannot be deactivated before its origin is deactivated. Workaround proposed by Frank is correct solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 253643] Enhancement - Option to include command line in open file search list
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '09

18 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253643 ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-18 18:41:41 EDT --- This still exists in Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 253640] Enhancement - Please wait/hourglass addition
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '09

18 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253640 ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-18 18:40:48 EDT --- This still exists in Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 233214] Crash within create launcher following an attempt to create a new folder
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Aug '09

18 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233214 ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from ray hammond <ray_hammond(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-18 18:32:05 EDT --- This bug still exists in Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 354031] broken URL in xmlrpc3-client package description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '09

17 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354031 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-17 15:19:15 EDT --- Fixed in CVS. Build is going now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610571 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 354031] broken URL in xmlrpc3-client package description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '09

17 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354031 --- Comment #7 from petrosyan(a)gmail.com 2009-08-17 15:05:46 EDT --- this particular bug is about fixing the broken URL only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 354031] broken URL in xmlrpc3-client package description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Aug '09

17 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354031 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-17 15:01:40 EDT --- I've asked upstream about moving to 3.1: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=286852 Is this really just a simple matter of updating the URL? If that's decouple-able from moving to 3.1, I'll do it in a heart beat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 207686] grub-install in rescue mode doesn't find grub
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Aug '09

16 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207686 Ed Avis <ed(a)membled.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ed(a)membled.com --- Comment #5 from Ed Avis <ed(a)membled.com> 2009-08-16 11:12:35 EDT --- This bug is still current in Fedora 11. I suggest updating the version, and then marking as a duplicate of bug 429785. (Sadly, this is another of those bugs that are swept under the carpet by the 'Fedora version X is no longer maintained' robot. Yet the problem still exists in Fedora releases up to the present day. Bug 422641 reports the same problem in RHEL 5.1, which could have been avoided if this bug had been noticed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 354031] broken URL in xmlrpc3-client package description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Aug '09

13 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354031 petrosyan(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 354031] broken URL in xmlrpc3-client package description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Aug '09

13 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354031 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Sebastian Krämer <mail(a)kraymer.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mail(a)kraymer.de --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 21:02:11 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Krämer <mail(a)kraymer.de> 2009-08-13 12:53:11 EDT --- Still wrong link in f11. As far as I can see from the changelog, version 3.1 didn't change API but gives many bugfixes. I don't use it myself (yet?) so, unfortunately, I can't say anything about compatibility from own experience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 233762] pcscd should not start on systems without appropriate hardware
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Aug '09

13 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233762 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-13 12:46:57 EDT --- Is this still an issue. I know this was fixed for bluetooth during the F-11 devel cycle. Maybe the same fix can be used here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 207470] Need ability to handle duplicate VG names for Xen
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Aug '09

12 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207470 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbonzini(a)redhat.com Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '09

11 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 David Woodhouse <dwmw2(a)infradead.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |473302(F12Target) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206410] [as_IN][bn][bn-IN][Glyphs] Some Rarely used Codepoints Glyphs missing Priority - C
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206410 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239756] fsck.hfsplus segfaults
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239756 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |10 Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 155794] boot freeze unless idle=poll - VIA VT8374 P4X400 Celeron 2.40GHz
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=155794 John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225507] nfsnobody == 4294967294 causes idmapd to stop responding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225507 Harald Klein <hklein(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hklein(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Harald Klein <hklein(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-10 05:50:55 EDT --- Maybe this is relevant: http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2007-December/007321.html best regards, Hari -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 239756] fsck.hfsplus segfaults
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '09

10 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239756 Joe Bayes <jbayes(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbayes(a)gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Joe Bayes <jbayes(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-10 02:44:22 EDT --- I can also still reproduce this with Fedora 10. Could somebody please reopen it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '09

09 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Marek Grac <mgrac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rmccabe(a)redhat.com |mgrac(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 182464] dbus-daemon hangs while starting on a system with ldap authorisation enabled.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464 Raina Otoni <raina(a)luggnagg.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |raina(a)luggnagg.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 155794] boot freeze unless idle=poll - VIA VT8374 P4X400 Celeron 2.40GHz
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=155794 --- Comment #61 from EWarner <edwarner99(a)yahoo.com> 2009-08-08 16:01:33 EDT --- This bug continues in Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199812] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [ffff81007ffa6810] 'on' is spewed repeatedly on the console
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Aug '09

08 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199812 faith <faithinfamilies(a)yahoo.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faithinfamilies(a)yahoo.com --- Comment #37 from faith <faithinfamilies(a)yahoo.com> 2009-08-08 05:27:05 EDT --- my Compaq Presario s6500nx has been stuck at 'loading' fc11 for a month now (soon after upgrade) with just the heavy white line across the bottom. been using dell d600 meanwhile, but really need to get this one working again. linux newbie here, just figured out to hit 'esc' and I see now it appears 'hung' with perpetual ... acpi: unable to turn cooling device [f6c63f18] 'on' acpi: unable to turn cooling device [f6c63f18] 'on' acpi: unable to turn cooling device [f6c63f18] 'on' acpi: unable to turn cooling device [f6c63f18] 'on' (never stops this; won't boot) h-e-l-p-!! please say how/where to edit what, remember I'm green - thanks much -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 179759] Ant should provide $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179759 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(pcheung(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com> 2009-08-07 18:24:12 EDT --- Fixed in 1.7.1-11.fc12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 346271] halt initscript does not properly handle apcupsd shutdowns
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346271 --- Comment #23 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-07 01:54:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > The apcupsd team is pretty responsive, has anyone tried to open a ticket there? unfortunately I have different experience :( > Perhaps a better solution is an additional program to apccontrol, say > /sbin/apckillpower, which has solely this kill function in it and none of the > snmp or lm_sensors dependencies. Might be pretty simple to whip up such a new > program (lots of cutting & pasting). I'll try to ask them if it'd work and if they are willing to do this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 217038] yaboot partition should be added to fstab during installation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217038 Alex Kanavin <ak(a)sensi.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|6 |11 Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #8 from Alex Kanavin <ak(a)sensi.org> 2009-08-06 09:50:38 EDT --- After some peaceful period, the problem has re-appeared in F11 - yaboot partition gets mounted if it's on an external drive, which leads to desktop clutter and kernel update failures. Shouldn't happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 346271] halt initscript does not properly handle apcupsd shutdowns
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346271 Trevor Cordes <trevor(a)tecnopolis.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trevor(a)tecnopolis.ca --- Comment #22 from Trevor Cordes <trevor(a)tecnopolis.ca> 2009-08-06 00:54:19 EDT --- "Me too". I've been using similar halt script patches as suggested in apcupsd docs to make mine work and it *seemed* to work the other day when I had an extended outage. Of course, the final killpower may have been the UPS actually hitting its hard battery limit and killing, vs software killing. There was at least 1-2 mins between when the screen said "will now power off the UPS" and when it actually shut off (SUA1500). Hmm, this may explain why some (remote) boxes I administer sometimes don't seem to kick back on after an outage. Without killpower working you have that pathological case where the power comes back right when the killpower would have executed. The apcupsd team is pretty responsive, has anyone tried to open a ticket there? Perhaps a better solution is an additional program to apccontrol, say /sbin/apckillpower, which has solely this kill function in it and none of the snmp or lm_sensors dependencies. Might be pretty simple to whip up such a new program (lots of cutting & pasting). Comment #8 (Matt), your extra step to "ensure the machine halts but stays running until the UPS cuts power" is unnecessary if your BIOS has a "power after power fail" "always on" option. Your step is only required if your BIOS only has the "last state" option. In general with UPSs you *always* want the "always on" option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 191506] i82875p_edac spitting EDAC errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191506 Mike Gahagan <mgahagan(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |513462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 225507] nfsnobody == 4294967294 causes idmapd to stop responding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225507 Ondrej Valousek <ondrejv(a)s3group.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejv(a)s3group.cz --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Valousek <ondrejv(a)s3group.cz> 2009-08-05 11:55:59 EDT --- the bug is still there (as of RHEL 5.3 x64) Ondrej -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510365, which changed state. Bug 510365 Summary: Unowned directories in rpm-4.7.0-1.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510365 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510364, which changed state. Bug 510364 Summary: Unowned directories in mc-4.6.2-9.pre1.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510364 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510362, which changed state. Bug 510362 Summary: Unowned directories in kde-l10n-4.2.2-1.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510362 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510361, which changed state. Bug 510361 Summary: Unowned directories in jwhois-4.0-13.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510361 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510357, which changed state. Bug 510357 Summary: Unowned man directories in dcraw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510357 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '09

05 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|man-pages |filesystem AssignedTo|varekova(a)redhat.com |ovasik(a)redhat.com --- Comment #28 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-05 06:39:12 EDT --- Ignore #27, I added those ghosted man subsections to locale dirs as well in filesystem-2.4.28-1.fc12, rpm -ql is already almost useless without grep due to locales/LC_MESSAGES, so no significant change... The same set of locales as for /usr/share/locale/<locale> is used and the same set of man subsections as in /usr/share/man is used. So likely many packages will no need removal of ownership for %dir /usr/share/man/<locale> and %dir /usr/share/man/<locale>/man{1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,n,1x,2x,3x,4x,5x,6x,7x,8x,9x,0p,1p,3p} . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 196358] utf8 is missing in "input codepages"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196358 --- Comment #5 from Slava Zanko <slavazanko(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-04 11:33:38 EDT --- Fixed in mc-4.7.0-pre1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 210620] Browsing files in the Find File dialog is difficult while the search is still in progress
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210620 Slava Zanko <slavazanko(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |slavazanko(a)gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Slava Zanko <slavazanko(a)gmail.com> 2009-08-04 11:32:57 EDT --- Fixed in mc-4.7.0-pre1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 346271] halt initscript does not properly handle apcupsd shutdowns
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346271 --- Comment #21 from Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-04 06:45:48 EDT --- I've asked fesco for exception in static linking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 206410] [as_IN][bn][bn-IN][Glyphs] Some Rarely used Codepoints Glyphs missing Priority - C
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '09

04 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206410 Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-04 02:43:21 EDT --- done the required changes latest build available in rawhide lohit-fonts-2.4.0-1 one can install rpm from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1578280 for testing about Only dotted circles for the following: 1. U+09E2 2. U+09E3 i have filed different bug for pango bug 514158 let me know if any problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 216160] dx with Lesstif tab widget - broken fonts, disappearing tabs, file widget broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216160 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Joachim Namislow <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jfrieben(a)hotmail.com --- Comment #18 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-25 20:51:31 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #19 from Joachim Namislow <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-03 09:38:34 EDT --- $ rpm -q dx lesstif dx-4.4.4-10.fc12.x86_64 lesstif-0.95.2-1.fc12.x86_64 - As of current "rawhide", it seems to be possible at least to change directories successfully by double-clicking in the file selector widget. - Tabs are still distorted as shown in comment #2. - Entries in the file selector are partially bold; this is not the case for 'ddd' though. Looks like bad internal defaults of 'dx'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 355761] DX does not pick up samples path when built against LessTif
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355761 --- Comment #12 from Joachim Namislow <jfrieben(a)hotmail.com> 2009-08-03 09:17:39 EDT --- No improvement after upgrading to lesstif-0.95.2-1.fc12.x86_64 on a "rawhide" system: "Samples..." still defaults to $HOME (fonts issues seem to be gone though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #27 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik(a)redhat.com> 2009-08-03 09:09:34 EDT --- Ivana is reluctant to add it to man package - and she has some good arguments for this. After reading fedora-packaging thread https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-July/msg00133.html , I was convinced by the discussions and I'm ok with having /usr/share/man/<locales> ghosted and owned by filesystem package. Done in filesystem-2.4.26-1.fc12. As sideeffect - now there will be many man directories owned by filesystem AND some additional package(s) - which turns to be a bug now. I'm a bit reluctant to add ghosted man subsections to filesystem (as it means ~10k additional entries in filesystem rpm -ql). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 244213] Fedora: Wrong init script
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244213 Bug 244213 depends on bug 244211, which changed state. Bug 244211 Summary: RHEL5: Wrong init script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244211 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Aug '09

02 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #21 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-08-02 23:07:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355952) xorg.conf for Fedora 10, with modeline for full 1680x1050 This configuration makes the Lenovo D221 display the full resolution of 1680x1050 over the DVI connector. The modeline I got from attachment 229421 (other attempted modelines caused display corruption) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Aug '09

02 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #355950|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #20 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-08-02 23:04:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355951) Xorg.0.log over DVI with Lenovo D221 LDC on Fedora 10 with modeline in xorg.conf Using the soon-to-be-attached xorg.conf (with a modeline set), I've been able to get Fedora 10 to display over the DVI connection at the full resolution. I'm not sure why I have to force it, but clearly this is what the autodetection should find... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Aug '09

02 Aug '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #19 from Andrew Bartlett <abartlet(a)samba.org> 2009-08-02 23:02:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355950) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355950) Xorg.0.log on Lenovo D221 LDC over DVI, with modeline in xorg.conf Using the soon-to-be-attached xorg.conf (with a modeline set), I've been able to get Fedora 10 to display over the DVI connection at the full resolution. I'm not sure why I have to force it, but clearly this is what the autodetection should find... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 365701] the --add-email argument removes additional information from abook addressbook
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Jul '09

31 Jul '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365701 Aram Agajanian <agajan(a)pobox.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |agajan(a)pobox.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage August 2009