triage November 2011

triage@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
40 discussions

[Bug 743020] New: rngd is missing initscript, attached
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Jan '12

12 Jan '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: rngd is missing initscript, attached https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=743020 Summary: rngd is missing initscript, attached Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: bzcl34nup Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: rng-tools AssignedTo: jgarzik(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: juan.oropeza(a)oracle.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cra(a)wpi.edu, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, jgarzik(a)redhat.com, ianburrell(a)gmail.com, pizza(a)shaftnet.org, paul(a)xelerance.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, avagarwa(a)redhat.com, juan.oropeza(a)oracle.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 215371 Type: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #215371 +++ rngd should always be started in platforms with hardware random support, but package provides no initscript to start the rngd. --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2006-11-13 13:21:28 EST --- Created attachment 141082 rngd initscript --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2007-01-25 21:49:16 EST --- Please try to get the init script for rngd into the package before FC7test1 feature freeze. I can't make it easier then I already did by supplying the init script. --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2007-01-30 12:58:47 EST --- Still an issue for rng-utils-2.0-1.14.1.fc6 --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2007-01-30 13:03:47 EST --- Created attachment 146934 Updated version of rngd.init supporting 2.6.19 style rng kernel modules Updated version of rngd.init supporting 2.6.19 style rng kernel modules --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2007-01-30 13:12:16 EST --- Created attachment 146935 Fix to previous version for properly modprobing hwrng sorry about that. previous version is broken. --- Additional comment from cra(a)wpi.edu on 2007-02-12 19:44:41 EST --- You should change version to devel. There is a commented out invocation of rngd in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit: # Use the hardware RNG to seed the entropy pool, if available #[ -x /sbin/rngd -a -c /dev/hw_random ] && rngd if [ -f /etc/crypttab ]; then s=$"Starting disk encryption using the RNG:" Not sure why this is commented out, but it may be necessary for starting disk encryption that follows it. --- Additional comment from triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 2008-04-04 00:39:59 EDT --- Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers --- Additional comment from paul(a)xelerance.com on 2008-04-07 17:54:03 EDT --- >From Fedora 9 beta 1: /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit:#[ -x /sbin/rngd -a -c /dev/hw_random ] && rngd It is still not using rngd on system start. This means crypto software like Openswan cannot use any P4/AMD hardware random. --- Additional comment from mike(a)miketc.net on 2008-05-02 23:25:00 EDT --- Bug has been assigned and changed to rawhide so it's up to date with latest release/development. Also, maybe you could show what version you are using currently and are you fully updated to current rawhide? --- Additional comment from triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 2008-05-13 22:28:05 EDT --- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from mattdm(a)mattdm.org on 2008-05-23 12:24:36 EDT --- See bug #130350 for discussion of why the line in rc.sysinit is commented out. Seems like a separate init script (or some fancy upstart incantation) may be the way to go, but the underlying flaw in the daemon maybe should get fixed too. (Perhaps this needs to be split into two separate bugs?) This is still an issue in fully-updated rawhide, by the way: initscripts-8.76.2-1, rng-utils-2.0-1.15.1.fc9 --- Additional comment from ianburrell(a)gmail.com on 2008-09-20 18:22:57 EDT --- Created attachment 317293 Fixed version of init script The latest version of init script has a couple of syntax errors. This script fixes the syntax errors. --- Additional comment from triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 2008-11-25 20:51:16 EST --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 2009-11-18 02:44:58 EST --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org on 2009-12-18 00:54:02 EST --- Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. --- Additional comment from pizza(a)shaftnet.org on 2010-01-27 15:50:11 EST --- This is still a problem with rng-utils-2.0-4 in F12; there is no init script present in the package. --- Additional comment from juan.oropeza(a)oracle.com on 2011-10-03 11:41:55 EDT --- this problem is still occurring in Fedora 15, is there a package update that includes the startup script? I get the following output with the sample script ./rngd start Probing for HRNG module FATAL: Error inserting intel_rng (/lib/modules/2.6.40.4-5.fc15.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/hw_random/intel-rng.ko): No such device FATAL: Error inserting via_rng (/lib/modules/2.6.40.4-5.fc15.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.ko): No such device FATAL: Error inserting amd_rng (/lib/modules/2.6.40.4-5.fc15.x86_64/kernel/drivers/char/hw_random/amd-rng.ko): No such device (Hardware RNG device inode not found) ./rngd: Cannot find a hardware RNG device to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

needinfo canceled: [Bug 528312] udev takes almost 100% CPU due to xorg (intel) continuously re-initializing displays
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

Product: Fedora Version: 14 Component: xorg-x11-server Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 528312: udev takes almost 100% CPU due to xorg (intel) continuously re-initializing displays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528312 ------- Additional Comments from Adam Jackson <ajax(a)redhat.com> This bug is well into tl;dr land, F14 is EOL very soon, and I've not seen any instance of this in ages. Closing. Please file new bugs if this is still an issue in F15 or later.

1 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 564522] UPX bundles lzma library and must stop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Nov '11

30 Nov '11

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: upx Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 564522: UPX bundles lzma library and must stop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564522 ------- Additional Comments from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> Fixed in rawhide.

1 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 626294] abrt issues different hashes for the same tracebacks
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Nov '11

29 Nov '11

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: abrt Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 626294: abrt issues different hashes for the same tracebacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626294 ------- Additional Comments from Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc(a)redhat.com> One of these bugs is reported by abrt-1.1.1 and the other by abrt-1.1.13 - there was a change in the hash generating logic between those versions and this problem should be fixed now.

1 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 545334] Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '11

28 Nov '11

Product: Publican Version: 2.3 Component: publican Jeff Fearn <jfearn(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 545334: Invalid XML can cause hard to decipher entity errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545334 ------- Additional Comments from Jeff Fearn <jfearn(a)redhat.com> Required modules were updated some time ago.

1 0

[Bug 244078] Document difference, if any, between "gpasswd -r" and "gpasswd -R"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244078 Paul <pablitobof(a)yahoo.com.mx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablitobof(a)yahoo.com.mx --- Comment #6 from Paul <pablitobof(a)yahoo.com.mx> 2011-11-27 21:41:33 EST --- Still not documented in shadow-utils-4.1.4.3-10.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204448] RPM verify not functional: "file's dependencies has changed since prelinking"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '11

27 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204448 Paul Victor Novarese <pvn(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pvn(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #77 from josip(a)icase.edu <jl-icase(a)comcast.net> 2011-11-26 15:20:26 EST --- (In reply to comment #76) > (In reply to comment #72) > > I experience this bug width grub legacy on Fedora 16 "preupgraded" from Fedora > > 14. [...] > > Same here, "preupgraded" from Fedora 15. The "preupgrade" process didn't > update grub.conf so it would presumably be stuck in preupgrade on subsequent > reboot. Removing/reinstalling the kernel produced the error message: > > "grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template" > > which may be the cause of preupgrade problem. Yes, F16 uses grub2, but settings for grub2 are not updated on installing Memtest86+ (see bug 729197), and "yum install kernel-PAE-3.1.2-1.fc16.i686" produces the above message under current Fedora 16 + grub2 installation. This shows that grub2 specific installation steps are broken in a number of F16 RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 josip(a)icase.edu <jl-icase(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jl-icase(a)comcast.net --- Comment #76 from josip(a)icase.edu <jl-icase(a)comcast.net> 2011-11-26 14:58:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #72) > I experience this bug width grub legacy on Fedora 16 "preupgraded" from Fedora > 14. [...] Same here, "preupgraded" from Fedora 15. The "preupgrade" process didn't update grub.conf so it would presumably be stuck in preupgrade on subsequent reboot. Removing/reinstalling the kernel produced the error message: "grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template" which may be the cause of preupgrade problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Nov '11

26 Nov '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #75 from Edouard Bourguignon <madko(a)linuxed.net> 2011-11-26 05:33:47 EST --- /etc/grub2.conf: /etc/default/grub: GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="quiet rhgb" rpm -q grubby: grubby-8.3-1.fc16.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage November 2011