Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: fail2ban
AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net
ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org,
axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de,
vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com,
ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com,
triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org,
voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com,
bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 244275
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++
Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275):
fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it
makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the
not
used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the
user.
Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable
the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default)
Additional information:
Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed
with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer:
--- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12
22:46:49 EST ---
Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I
will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this
with the Fedora package maintainer.
As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora,
which is why I file this bug now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed|2012-08-16 17:42:27 |2012-10-30 11:27:04
--- Comment #106 from Peter Jones <pjones(a)redhat.com> ---
This seems to have absolutely nothing to do with the original problem. Please
open a new bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #46 from Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> Can anyone merge the backtrace patch and update the rpm in Fedora?
Hi, and sorry -- it's been years since I've worked on Festival but I'll try to
help out since it's in bad shape. Give me a little bit to get back up to speed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607
--- Comment #45 from Hu Zheng <huzheng001(a)gmail.com> ---
Can anyone merge the backtrace patch and update the rpm in Fedora?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Eric Sandeen <esandeen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|esandeen(a)redhat.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu(a)irc.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|zdzichu(a)irc.pl |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246
--- Comment #105 from Mads Kiilerich <mads(a)kiilerich.com> ---
(In reply to comment #104)
In this case grubby explained clearly what the problem was.
Please file a new bug report. Especially if there is some good reason your
/boot/efi is read-only.
This is a consequence of the (in my opinion very unfortunate) design decision
that the EFI boot loader uses a grub.cfg that isn't /boot/grub2/grub.cfg.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246
Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |alonbl(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.