triage April 2012

triage@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
24 discussions

[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '13

03 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341 Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: fail2ban AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de, vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com, ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org, voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com, bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 244275 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++ Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275): fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the not used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the user. Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default) Additional information: Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer: --- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12 22:46:49 EST --- Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this with the Fedora package maintainer. As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora, which is why I file this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 126342] Meta bug: custom built kernels
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '12

01 May '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |helbermg(a)gmail.com --- Comment #58 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> 2012-04-30 19:43:35 EDT --- *** Bug 817698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 199246] [enh] support bridges
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 Robert Spanton <rspanton(a)zepler.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rspanton(a)zepler.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 221073] logrotate script should use SIGUSR1 signal not SIGHUP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

1 0

[Bug 221073] logrotate script should use SIGUSR1 signal not SIGHUP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221073 Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Joe Orton <jorton(a)redhat.com> 2012-04-27 12:05:39 EDT --- Commit: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=httpd.git;a=commitdiff;h=f7210bd855… Package: httpd-2.4.2-5.fc18 Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=315788 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 330971] /usr/include/bits/fcntl2.h:51: error: call to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT in second
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330971 J. McCann <lynnsheridan132(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lynnsheridan132(a)gmail.com --- Comment #7 from J. McCann <lynnsheridan132(a)gmail.com> 2012-04-25 03:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > And on line 93 of extrastero_impl.cc: > > mFd=::open(file.c_str(), O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC); > yeah i had this compiling gcc 3.4.6, i did the equivalent of mFd=::open(file.c_str(), O_RDWR , O_CREAT | O_TRUNC); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 162774] strace ignores int3 SIGTRAP
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Apr '12

24 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774 Dmitry V. Levin <ldv(a)altlinux.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

needinfo canceled: [Bug 593277] nil in cookie management
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Product: Fedora Version: 14 Component: rubygem-mongrel Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo: Bug 593277: nil in cookie management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593277 ------- Additional Comments from Vít Ondruch <vondruch(a)redhat.com> Mongrel was retired as well as F14. Going to close this ticket

1 0

[Bug 126342] Meta bug: custom built kernels
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Apr '12

23 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342 Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaricp(a)gmail.com --- Comment #57 from Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)redhat.com> 2012-04-23 10:14:09 EDT --- *** Bug 815115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 204448] RPM verify not functional: "file's dependencies has changed since prelinking"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Apr '12

20 Apr '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204448 Addinall <addinall(a)addinall.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |addinall(a)addinall.net --- Comment #20 from Addinall <addinall(a)addinall.net> 2012-04-20 14:13:35 EDT --- YEah. I have got it in a 20 hour old install of F16 32bit. Bloody annoying since the bug seems to be over six years old now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage April 2012