Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341
Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: fail2ban
AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net
ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org,
axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de,
vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com,
ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com,
triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org,
voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com,
bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 244275
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++
Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275):
fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it
makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the
not
used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the
user.
Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable
the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default)
Additional information:
Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed
with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer:
--- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12
22:46:49 EST ---
Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I
will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this
with the Fedora package maintainer.
As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora,
which is why I file this bug now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> has canceled Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo:
Bug 622630: Review Request: pcalc - A program for calculating and converting
between different bases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=622630
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: anaconda
Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo:
Bug 524622: "Not enough space" dialog has inaccurate reasoning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524622
------- Additional Comments from Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>
This was fixed back in 2010, with commit
aa38414669a63ac53fa27935e7a2c1c90f670056
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: procps
Jaromír Cápík <jcapik(a)redhat.com> has canceled Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for needinfo:
Bug 584154: ps <pid> does not work if <pid> belongs to a lwp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584154
------- Additional Comments from Jaromír Cápík <jcapik(a)redhat.com>
Hello Elliott.
I just found, that this is a bit tricky. Directory listing of /proc doesn't
show LWPs, but if you try to read from /proc/<LWP>/stat, the file exists and is
readable. So, the path needs to be fully specified by hand without
autocompletion with TAB. I'll try to continue with the investigation.
Regards,
Jaromir.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232921
Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. |
|com) |
Last Closed|2008-06-16 21:16:40 |2012-06-29 08:27:56
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Right you are. Fixed in rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232921
Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |opensource(a)till.name
Flags| |needinfo?(limburgher@gmail.
| |com)
--- Comment #6 from Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name> ---
The current Rawhide spec does not contain any httpd specific files, therefore
the "Requires: httpd" can afaics safely dropped there now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197888
Andy Grover <agrover(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |agrover(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243300
Andy Grover <agrover(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |agrover(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208017
Andy Grover <agrover(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |agrover(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244338
Andy Grover <agrover(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |agrover(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.