triage May 2013

triage@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
11 discussions

[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341 Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: fail2ban AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de, vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com, ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org, voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com, bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 244275 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++ Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275): fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the not used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the user. Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default) Additional information: Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer: --- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12 22:46:49 EST --- Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this with the Fedora package maintainer. As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora, which is why I file this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 445804] CVE-2008-2079 mysql: privilege escalation via DATA/INDEX DIRECTORY directives [Fedora rawide]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 May '13

31 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445804 Tomas Hoger <thoger(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|969506 | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3nWRuXIXVP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 445804] CVE-2008-2079 mysql: privilege escalation via DATA/INDEX DIRECTORY directives [Fedora rawide]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 May '13

31 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445804 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |969506 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0CuT2j2Q2k&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 158809] Udev slow to create dev entries for ttyUSB
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 May '13

23 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158809 Vincent S. Cojot <vincent(a)cojot.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vincent(a)cojot.name -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pB7FEbr7Uj&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 224544] find provides should only search in ld directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 May '13

20 May '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224544 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pmatilai(a)redhat.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2013-05-20 06:31:39 --- Comment #21 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> --- The "unwanted provides from dlopen'ed modules" issue has been addressed in upstream + rawhide now, but differently (filter by dependency name, not path): http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-May/182919.htm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IphNRmvlRF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 134638] Add striping to lvm creation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 May '13

14 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638 Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anaconda-maint-list@redhat. | |com, dshea(a)redhat.com, | |g.kaviyarasu(a)hotmail.com, | |jonathan(a)jonmasters.org, | |kanarip(a)kanarip.com, | |mkolman(a)redhat.com, | |sbueno(a)redhat.com Component|lvm2 |anaconda Assignee|lvm-team(a)redhat.com |anaconda-maint-list@redhat. | |com --- Comment #37 from Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac(a)redhat.com> --- Moving this bug back to Anaconda, since it's the user who should decide the configuration of striping - it should not happen 'magically' behind the scene - there are users who wants to strip - and those who don't.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eIwD1UiEeY&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 199246] [enh] support bridges
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '13

13 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 Dean Hunter <deanhunter(a)comcast.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|deanhunter(a)comcast.net | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y9yecpJNPG&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 199246] [enh] support bridges
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '13

13 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199246 Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |807039 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1XcY776tJ4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 317271] License conflicts: freeradius vs. openssl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 May '13

13 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317271 --- Comment #5 from John Dennis <jdennis(a)redhat.com> --- re comment #3 freeradius has shipped with the recommended openssl license exception (see /usr/share/doc/freeradius-*/LICENSE.openssl since 2009. This was approved by both Red Hat legal and Tom Callaway who oversee's Fedora's licensing. Given the license exception has been in effect for 4 years now and is approved I see no need to reopen this bug. We will not port FreeRADIUS to an alternate crypto library because that would cause the configuration and operation of our version to differ from that of the upstream version. Compatibility with upstream is vital for customers and users who rely on deploying FreeRADIUS consistently across multiple distributions. Also, upstream is well aware of the issue, in fact we and upstream arrived at the solution together 4 years ago, so I doubt upstream is going to be very interested in reopening this either. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RP9cF34xG1&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 317271] License conflicts: freeradius vs. openssl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '13

12 May '13

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317271 --- Comment #4 from mejiko <kame55-itasenpara123(a)y2.dion.ne.jp> --- Additional URI: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/10/msg00113.html http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0DjjGa1DKR&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage May 2013