triage June 2013

triage@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
10 discussions

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #23 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> --- (In reply to Harvey Harrison from comment #22) > I believe the boost license is an acceptable Fedora license, and is GPL > compatible, whom do I ask to make sure that is OK? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Jx6M5jdLAH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #22 from Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison(a)gmail.com> --- Looking at the remaining functions, it turns out the code in question was a java port of some c++ code that was under a much more permissive license, I'm just going to go back to the original c++ and re-port these two functions myself. Original c++: http://www.geometrictools.com/ Covered by the Boost license: http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt I believe the boost license is an acceptable Fedora license, and is GPL compatible, whom do I ask to make sure that is OK? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UAyycW5o5i&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #21 from Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison(a)gmail.com> --- FWIW, I put in a bit of time this weekend and now have it down to only two functions remaining in Java3d-utils that are used from Java3d-core, once those are removed/reimplemented, Java3d should be ready to go in, it appears that a new enough Jogl2 is already packaged in fedora, so Java3d should be pretty simple to package now. Harvey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=c6xD4TRsxk&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #20 from Eric Smith <spacewar(a)gmail.com> --- And the work I did on packaging upstream Java3d, and more recently on Harvey's fork, has been based on using the existing Fedora vecmath package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rVk4DKwvie&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi --- Comment #19 from Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> --- (In reply to Harvey Harrison from comment #17) > Updating status, I've removed the Java3d core dependency from j3dutils for > all but one class which I'm still working one. The class in question is > com.sun.j3d.internal.Distance which is a collection of static math functions > ported from the 'Wild Magic' library according to the file header. Once > this is removed, Java3d and vecmath should be OK to go into fedora. Vecmath is already in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FKX2BRqlUT&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jun '13

15 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> --- hi see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/jogl2 after login, ask to become co-maintainer regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Lu3r8LEBiU&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 832853] Review Request: java3d - Java 3D
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jun '13

15 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 --- Comment #17 from Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison(a)gmail.com> --- Updating status, I've removed the Java3d core dependency from j3dutils for all but one class which I'm still working one. The class in question is com.sun.j3d.internal.Distance which is a collection of static math functions ported from the 'Wild Magic' library according to the file header. Once this is removed, Java3d and vecmath should be OK to go into fedora. If anyone has a look at that file and feels it is OK to move it over the Java3d core, I'd appreciate any advice, my current plans are to remove its use entirely from core, but it is a larger task. Because Java3d is now a java-only project and no longer ships any native code, I imagine the fedora packages will need pruning. How do I find the packager for JOGL2 in Fedora-land to coordinate a suitably modern version of jogl2 for Java3d's use? I am involved in JOGL2 upstream, but not fedora as yet. Harvey -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4twuCBXzd4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 225737] Merge Review: evolution-exchange
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jun '13

14 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225737 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2013-06-15 00:02:55 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> --- This package is dead as of F18. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DFW79IWEzu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '13

03 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 Dirk L. <dvorg23(a)intra.udk-berlin.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dvorg23(a)intra.udk-berlin.de --- Comment #40 from Dirk L. <dvorg23(a)intra.udk-berlin.de> --- Hello, today i have installed my new Wokstation 3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64 an the Problem with the Alt-Gr is back, all Updates are installed but the Alt-Gr Key dosn´t work :( My old Fedora 16 64Bit don´t have this Problem until is was fixed in the history. I use on Fedora 18 Tigervnc: tigervnc-server-1.2.80-0.10.20130314svn5065.fc18.x86_64 Can You please fix it Thanks Dirk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5G94a68GDj&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 781341] New: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jun '13

02 Jun '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781341 Summary: Unnecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: unspecified Component: fail2ban AssignedTo: axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net ReportedBy: vogel(a)folz.de QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, mattdm(a)mattdm.org, axel.thimm(a)atrpms.net, tim(a)niemueller.de, vogel(a)folz.de, jonathan.underwood(a)gmail.com, ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com, wdierkes(a)rackspace.com, triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org, voronin.andrey(a)gmail.com, bugzilla.redhat.com(a)ewood.users.cementhorizon.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 244275 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #244275 +++ Description of problem (copied from Bug #244275): fail2ban doesn't require shorewall to function, and in fact, as we ship it, it makes use of the Fedora firewall - installing an extra firewall which is the not used in the default configuration is a bit gratuitous and confusing to the user. Also, the Requires: tcpwrappers isn't needed unless the user decides to enable the tcpwrapper action (disabled by default) Additional information: Bug #244275 contains suggestions and possible patches for a fix, but was closed with NOTABUG as noted in the comment from the EPEL maintainer: --- Additional comment from maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org on 2012-01-12 22:46:49 EST --- Since this is just the EPEL package and I don't maintain fail2ban for Fedora, I will be keeping it in line with Fedora proper. Please feel free to discuss this with the Fedora package maintainer. As I wrote in some comments in Bug #244275, I'm interested in a fix for Fedora, which is why I file this bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

triage June 2013