Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Component: dnf
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> has asked for fedora_prioritized_bug:
Bug 1812596: repoquery suddenly missing results in --whatrequires on Fedora 32+
(seem to be related to virtual provides)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812596
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Proposing this as a prioritized bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224091
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|tmraz(a)redhat.com |extras-orphan@fedoraproject
| |.org
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions <fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
This package has changed maintainer in the Fedora.
Reassigning to the new maintainer of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: fedora-easy-karma
Mitch Davis <mjd+redhat(a)afork.com> has denied Bug Zapper
<triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>'s request for Mitch Davis
<mjd+redhat(a)afork.com>'s needinfo:
Bug 679235: fedora-easy-karma has no man page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679235
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Component: mdadm
Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> has canceled XiaoNi <xni(a)redhat.com>'s request
for fedora_prioritized_bug:
Bug 1801010: raid check systemd config errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801010
--- Comment #37 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
The fedora_prioritized_bug flag is for the Prioritized Bugs process:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/program_management/prioritized_bugs/
It has no effect on package updates (nor does the status of a bug in Bugzilla.
Just the opposite, in fact, as updates move through the system, Bodhi will
update the status of the bug appropriately).
In this case, I don't see an update in Bodhi. Xiao, did you submit an update
(e.g. with `fedpkg update`) or did you just do a Koji build? If you only did a
Koji build, that's why the update hasn't appeared: it doesn't exist. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#Later_Branched_and_stab…
eleases
(You may also want to apply this patch to Rawhide)
I am clearing the fedora_prioritized_bug flag.
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Component: mdadm
XiaoNi <xni(a)redhat.com> has asked for fedora_prioritized_bug:
Bug 1801010: raid check systemd config errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801010
--- Comment #36 from XiaoNi <xni(a)redhat.com> ---
I'm not sure how to include one bug into fedora version. mdadm-4.1-5.fc32
hasn't been included in f32.
Set fedora_prioritized_bug to have a try. And I'll ask other people about this.
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Component: selinux-policy
Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> has asked for fedora_prioritized_bug:
Bug 1811407: SELinux is preventing accounts-daemon from 'sys_nice' accesses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811407
--- Comment #63 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
Moving the fedora_prioritized_bug? flag from bug 1795524 in case this bug gets
reopened as agreed in today's Fedora Prioritized Bugs meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-06/fedora_prioriti…
bugs_and_issues.2020-05-06-15.00.log.html#l-42
(disabling email on this comment since the bug is already closed)
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Component: selinux-policy
Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> has canceled Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com>'s
request for fedora_prioritized_bug:
Bug 1795524: SELinux denials for 'setsched' and 'sys_nice' for various
glib-based processes (force glib down a fallback path with performance
implications)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795524
--- Comment #181 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
Removing the prioritized bug flag and moving it to bug 1811407 as agreed in
today's Prioritized Bugs meeting:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-05-06/fedora_prioriti…
bugs_and_issues.2020-05-06-15.00.log.html#l-42
(email notification for this comment disabled since the bug is already closed)