users February 2013

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

217 participants
262 discussions

Grub2/Grub2 Themes Usage Issues
by Stephen Morris 11 Mar '13

11 Mar '13

Hi, I have activated the usage of the Starfield theme for grub2 in Fedora 17 and I am having issues with it. 1). Scrolling through the list of entries in the menu at boot time is horribly slow. Every time I scroll with the arrow keys the screen flashes black and it takes several seconds for the next/previous entry to be highlighted. 2). I have just upgraded from from an Nvidia Geforce 9800 GT to an Nvidia Geforce GTX 650 (this is a PCI-E 3 card plugged into a PCI-E 2 slot) and now I can see the graphics for the theme being drawn on the screen as I watch, whereas with the 9800 the screen draw was instantaneous. The issue highlighted in point 1) occurs independently of the graphics card in terms of the same thing happens with both graphics cards. 3). When I do an upgrade that upgrades the kernel the upgrade process tries to update the grub2 config and mbr but is unable to because /sbin/grubby fails with an access denied error even though I am effectively running in root mode via sudo (implemented via the wheel group). I have also tried this after switching to root mode via su but that fails with the same error. 4). Because of the error highlighted in point 3, when upgrading the kernel, I have to manual run a grub2-mkconfig and grub2-install to update grub and this process rebuilds the Starfield's Theme.txt file back to the defaults from the manual customization I have done from white/grey bold text. The black/black bold text does not work for me on the Starfield background. My system is an Asus Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 motherboard, AMD FX 4 GHz 8 core cpu, Geforce GTX 650 2 GB graphics card, 16 GB memory, 256 GB SSD (this has Win 8 and the boot partitions for Fedora 17 and Ubuntu 12.10 installed on it) and 2 2 TB Seagate hard disks, so from my perspective computing power is not an issue. What is the best way to rectify these issues? regards, Steve

2 3

fedora 16, ext4 corruption
by Ian Malone 04 Mar '13

04 Mar '13

Hi, Is anyone else seeing problems with F16 ext4? I recently moved my install onto a new harddisc (which is reporting SMART is fine after running a full test) and did that by making a new ext4 fs (previously ext3) then rsyncing across. I'm now seeing occasional system 'freezes' (not hard freezes, but programs can fail to start or freeze. Yesterday the desktop completely stopped, but I was able to switch to a virtual console). dmesg reports errors to do with failing to write the journal and remounting read-only. On reboot an fsck is required, which finds some fixable problems. Obviously I'm wondering if it's the OS or the new disc. Was planning an F18 install soon which might help with one problem but not the other. Don't know if it's the 'ext4 data corruption bug' or if that's been fixed. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk

4 6

Slighty OT Git Hub/Heroku
by Roger 03 Mar '13

03 Mar '13

I have a git hub repository where I have put the Ruby on Rails development system on Heroku for work by myself and 2 other volunteer devs. How and/or where would I post the file tree so that we all can work on the various files, I'm lost on this aspect. I have explored Github and Heroku but could find no thing obvious. Can someone point me in the right direction to get this dev working Thank you in advance Roger

3 3

Multiboot question
by Christopher Meng 02 Mar '13

02 Mar '13

Hi all, Recently I'm stucked with multiboot. I have a disk with following partition: sd1. 157GB NTFS of Win8 sd2. 55GB including: sd5. 500M /boot sd6. 4GB /swap sd7. 50GB BTRFS Fedora 18 sd3. 55GB not parted sd4. 32GB not parted Now I want to install Fedora 17 on sd3 or sd4, but I don't know howto. From Anaconda I failed evrrytime for not enough space or some other reasons. So any hints availabe? I think two lvm is the way of installing dual Fedora, isn't it? Thanks everyone in advance!

6 8

Preupgrade fc15->fc16
by Tod Thomas 02 Mar '13

02 Mar '13

I just completed upgrading a FC14 virtual machine running under virtual box and it went pretty well. Now I am trying to do the same upgrade only on a FC15 standalone machine to FC16. It looks like it can't find any of the FC15 repos which is odd since FC14 went so well. Should I expect this to work or is the FC15 release just too old? Why did the FC14 upgrade go so well? TIA - Tod

3 3

copy full system from old disk to a new one
by Martín Marqués 02 Mar '13

02 Mar '13

How can I pass my whole system from an old SATA disk (which is giving me some trouble) to a new disk. I have 4 partitions, all of which I have only passed /home using cp -.a I'm a bit concerned about the root file system, how to change grub, and if I'll have trouble with non-regular files from /var. TIA! -- Martín Marqués select 'martin.marques' || '@' || 'gmail.com' DBA, Programador, Administrador

18 52

What does "mapping=identity" mean in /etc/exports?
by Greg Scott 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

Hello - I'm migrating an old NFS server to newer hardware. /etc/exports in the old environment looks like this: /shares/IMSHCS01 *(rw,insecure,sync,no_root_squash,all_squash,mapping=identity,anonuid=0,anongid=0 So the old system is exporting the directory, /shares/IMSHCS01 to anyone and everyone who wants to connect, with a bunch of switches essentially making it wide open. Wonderful. But on the new system, when I set up /etc/exports the same way, I get this error: [root@nfs2013 etc]# exportfs -av exportfs: /etc/exports:1: unknown keyword "mapping=identity" [root@nfs2013 etc]# Getting rid of "mapping=identity", my shared directory exports just fine. I can find no mention of "mapping=identity" in any man pages, but several google references show this option in pasted-in copies of /etc/exports files. My hunch is, this is an obsolete option and no longer supported - but what did it do in case my new server needs to behave the same way the old server behaved? Thanks - Greg Scott

4 8

NFS Client: Backup preparation problem
by Amit Karpe 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Hi All, I am not able to access particular directory on client which is mounted using NFS. client# ls -l /mnt/tmp ls: cannot access /mnt/tmp/del: Permission denied total 0 ?????????? ? ? ? ? ? del I have following disk on server. server# ls -ld /disk12 drwxrwxr-- 3 root root 4096 2013-02-28 15:53 /disk12 Entry in /etc/exports on server. /disk12 172.21.123.219(rw,sync) On client Entry in /etc/fstab 172.21.123.225:/disk12 /mnt/tmp nfs fsc,rsize=32768,wsize=40960,rw 0 0 If I used no_root_squash in /etc/exports on server I can access directory without problem. /disk12 172.21.123.219(rw,sync,no_root_squash) What can be the problem ?

2 2

LXDE/gnome switch
by Patrick Dupre 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Hello, Can I easily switch from LDXE and gnome 3 and back (in fedora 18)? Thank. -- ====================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)kegtux.org Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France ======================================================================

4 3

Re: [postgis-users] Fedora 18: PostGIS/Postgresql interoperability
by Max Pyziur 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > Hi, > > Updates were blocked by a Fedora contributor who wanted to push his security update for another package first. > > Given that GeOS 3.3.8 was released today, and PostGIS 2.0.3 is very close, I can give another try this weekend. > > Still, I strongly suggest you to use PostgreSQL RPM repo: http://yum.postgresql.org . It includes whatever you need. This effectively undermines being on one coherent working environment; in this case, Fedora 18. The fact that F18 was released w/ Postgresql 9.2 and version of Postgis (1.5.*) which can't be used w/ 9.2 is disconcerting. > Regards, > > -- > Devrim Gündüz Max Pyziur pyz(a)brama.com

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
27
Older →

Jump to page: