thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
You can stuff "-y" into /etc/fsckoptions or create /etc/sysconfig/autofsck and add
AUTOFSCK_OPT="-y"
to it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer rps2@nerd.com - - Hosting Consulting, Inc. - - - - A squeegee, by any other name, wouldn't sound as funny. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 18:13 +0000, tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
I don't think so since forcefsck is not a command just a file that has to exist, -- ======================================================================= polygon: Dead parrot. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@sbcglobal.net
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:57 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
You can stuff "-y" into /etc/fsckoptions or create /etc/sysconfig/autofsck and add
AUTOFSCK_OPT="-y"
to it.
Is there any chance that this would mess up an LVM setup?
Regards, Les H
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 17:15 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote:
I don't think so since forcefsck is not a command just a file that has to exist,
What about using XFS instead of ext{2,3}? How do I make the fsck use a xfs_repair instead of a xfs_check on startup?
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:27 -0700, Les wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:57 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
You can stuff "-y" into /etc/fsckoptions or create /etc/sysconfig/autofsck and add
AUTOFSCK_OPT="-y"
to it.
Is there any chance that this would mess up an LVM setup?
Have you gotten an answer?? I'd like to know. Ric
Ric Moore wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:27 -0700, Les wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:57 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:
thanks for the suggestion about the touch /forcefsck
someone here wanted me to ask if we can do touch /forcefsck -a to automate the fsck so no one has to be there to answer "yes", "yes", ...
You can stuff "-y" into /etc/fsckoptions or create /etc/sysconfig/autofsck and add
AUTOFSCK_OPT="-y"
to it.
Is there any chance that this would mess up an LVM setup?
Have you gotten an answer?? I'd like to know. Ric
Not unless there is a significant bug somewhere.
Roger
-
Aaron Konstam -
Howard Howell -
Renich Bon Ciric -
Ric Moore -
Rick Stevens -
Roger Heflin -
tony.chamberlain＠lemko.com