users May 2014

users@lists.stg.fedoraproject.org

165 participants
181 discussions

RPM build error
by Ranjan Maitra 15 Feb '15

15 Feb '15

Hello, I am trying to build an RPM for sylfilter available at http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/sylfilter/src/sylfilter-%{?version}.tar.gz with the attached .spec file but I get the following errors: ..... error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/sylfilter/bayes-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/blacklist-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-gdbm.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-qdbm.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-sqlite.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-manager.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-utils.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/ngram-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/textcontent-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/whitelist-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/wordsep-filter.h /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.a /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.la /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0 /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0.0.0 RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/sylfilter/bayes-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/blacklist-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-gdbm.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-qdbm.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-sqlite.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-manager.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter-utils.h /usr/include/sylfilter/filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/ngram-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/textcontent-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/whitelist-filter.h /usr/include/sylfilter/wordsep-filter.h /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.a /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.la /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0 /usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0.0.0 Not sure what the issue is, but wondering if anyone had any suggestions? Many thanks and best wishes, Ranjan -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. ____________________________________________________________ GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features! Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!

6 17

WiFi permanently disappeared after booting test kernel
by Mike Fleetwood 26 Aug '14

26 Aug '14

Hi, On my netbook I booted a test kernel 3.8.0-rc4+ I compiled. Now after booting back into my regular Fedora kernel 3.6.11-5.fc17.i686.PAE my wifi network device remains permanently disappeared. No wifi networks displayed in Network Manager gui. Also the Network Manager syslog messages make it look like the device has completely disappeared. Suggestions for restoring wifi welcome. Thanks Mike Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when working before --8<-- Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> monitoring kernel firmware directory '/lib/firmware'. Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill2: found WiFi radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:01:00.0/ieee80211/phy0/rfkill2) (driver ath9k) Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill0: found WiFi radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill0) (platform driver eeepc) Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill4: found WWAN radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill4) (platform driver eeepc) Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WiFi enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WWAN enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WiMAX enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Networking is enabled by state file ... Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): using nl80211 for WiFi device control Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <warn> (wlan0): driver supports Access Point (AP) mode Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): new 802.11 WiFi device (driver: 'ath9k' ifindex: 3) Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): exported as /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1 Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): now managed Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): device state change: unmanaged -> unavailable (reason 'managed') [10 20 2] Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): bringing up device. ... Jan 18 23:01:59 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Activation (wlan0) successful, device activated. Jan 18 23:01:59 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Commit) complete. Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when broken after --8<-- Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> monitoring kernel firmware directory '/lib/firmware'. Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> rfkill0: found WiFi radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill0) (platform driver eeepc) Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> rfkill2: found WWAN radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill2) (platform driver eeepc) Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WiFi disabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WWAN enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WiMAX enabled by radio killswitch; enabled by state file Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> Networking is enabled by state file No (wlan0) related NetworkManager syslog messages afterwards at all.

4 3

Brother HL-5250DN duplex printing: loves me, loves me not, ...
by Michael Hannon 03 Jul '14

03 Jul '14

Greetings. I've got a brother HL-5250DN printer on my local network, and it is *currently* not doing duplex printing under Fedora 20. I've seen discussions of a similar problem in various places. The responses to the problem seem to fall into several categories: (1) Duplex printing must be *enabled* on the printer before it will print duplex. (2) Some printers are not well-supported under linux. You should check the Open Printing database (or similar). (3) Get the printer driver from Brother. Regarding (1), the duplex option *is* enabled on the printer, and it *does* print in duplex from Windows and Mac systems (and others -- see below). Regarding (2), the printer printed in duplex just fine through various versions of Fedora, up through Fedora 18 (the last version I had installed prior to Fedora 20). Furthermore, it prints duplex just fine from an Ubuntu 14.04 system that I have running in VirtualBox on my Fedora machine. In all cases the duplex printing capability happened without my having to expend any brain power at all on the issue: it "just worked". Regarding (3), I've tried that, but it didn't appear to help. So far as I can tell, my problems are pretty similar to those reported by other people. One possibly novel thing: I noticed, without paying close attention, that some of the recent updates to Fedora 20 have been CUPS-related. That motivated me to roll the dice and try duplex printing again. And shazam! It worked! If that were the end of the story, I wouldn't bother to tell it. The printer once again does *not* print duplex. I'm assuming that the problem must have been fixed by one CUPS-related upgrade and broken again by a later one. Here are the candidates: # rpm -qa --last | grep -i cups cups-filters-1.0.53-2.fc20.x86_64 Thu 15 May 2014 11:48:18 AM PDT cups-filters-libs-1.0.53-2.fc20.x86_64 Thu 15 May 2014 11:48:15 AM PDT bluez-cups-5.18-1.fc20.x86_64 Fri 02 May 2014 12:18:41 PM PDT cups-1.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:41:06 AM PDT cups-libs-1.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:40:45 AM PDT cups-filesystem-1.7.2-1.fc20.noarch Wed 30 Apr 2014 11:40:45 AM PDT python-cups-1.9.65-1.fc20.x86_64 Sat 15 Mar 2014 03:09:34 PM PDT gutenprint-cups-5.2.9-14.fc20.x86_64 Mon 23 Dec 2013 11:23:50 PM PST cups-pk-helper-0.2.5-2.fc20.x86_64 Mon 23 Dec 2013 11:08:33 PM PST Unfortunately, as I said, I wasn't paying close attention to the timing of the not-work/work/not-work cycle, so I can't shed any more light on the problem. If you can, I'd love to hear from you. BTW, the driver I'm using is: Brother HL-5250DN Foomatic/Postscript and it *does* have the duplex printing option enabled: Double-sided printing: Long Edge (standard) Thanks. -- Mike

5 8

losing WiFi Access - prompted for password
by SternData 09 Jun '14

09 Jun '14

F18... Over the last few days, I'm getting prompted to re-enter my password for my WiFi network. It's not the router because no other device on the network seems to be having problems. Potential changes on my system include May 07 21:39:32 Updated: 1:wpa_supplicant-1.1-1.fc18.x86_64 May 25 15:33:44 Installed: kernel-3.9.3-201.fc18.x86_64 May 27 08:06:42 Updated: 1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 May 27 08:06:47 Updated: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 May 27 08:06:53 Updated: network-manager-applet-0.9.8.1-4.git20130514.fc18.x86_64 Given that this has really started the day before yesterday, I suspect it has something to do with the NetworkManager update. Is anyone else having this problem? (Please -- do not tell me to "dump the evil NetworkManager". I'm trying to solve a problem here, not make some stand against the tide. Thanks.) -- -- Steve

3 3

systemctl restart network, VMs and suspend
by Aleksandar Kostadinov 07 Jun '14

07 Jun '14

Hello, I already filed a bugzilla issue with this [1] but I'd like to know if anybody else has troubles with VMs' network after suspend. And if others are able to do a "systemctl restart network" successfully. I mean, am I an isolated case because of some unknown configuration I have or is this common? What I do is: launch VM suspend laptop wake up laptop after awhile (1 hour maybe) network of VM loses default route systemctl restart network # fails on both fedora 20 - guest and host I'll appreciate if somebody else with same experience comments in the bugzilla issue directly. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100034

3 2

Fedora-like Linux for 1.99GB RAM?
by Oliver Ruebenacker 05 Jun '14

05 Jun '14

Hello, I need a new OS for an old computer, an about 10 years old x86. I upgraded RAM from 500MB to 2GB, though Windows XP reports 1.99 GB. I would have installed Fedora, but they say the requirements are at least 4GB RAM. Is there any Linux distro similar to Fedora that works for 1.99 GB RAM? I'd love to use KDE, although if it really doesn't work, I could also settle for Xfce. Thanks! Best, Oliver -- Oliver Ruebenacker Founder at Relomics Consulting <http://www.relomics.com> Be always grateful, but never satisfied.

19 31

QuickSynergy
by Liam Proven 03 Jun '14

03 Jun '14

Has anyone successfully got this working between two Fedora 20 machines? The app says that the default port -- 24800 -- is not available. I don't know why, I can't see anything taking it in the firewall or anything, but anyway, changing to different ports doesn't seem to help... the client and server never connect. Can anyone give me any pointers as to how to start to troubleshoot this? Thanks in advance. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lproven(a)cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lproven(a)hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Cell: +44 7939-087884

2 10

So has anyone gotten their sound to work since it broke a few days ago?
by Someone 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

I'm completely up to date, and I've rebooted several times. Has anyone had any luck with playing sound? Thanks

14 22

Re: Create virt F20 on new physical /dev/sda -> OK; boot live > F20 on /dev/sda now fails
by Philip Rhoades 31 May '14

31 May '14

Tim, > Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 13:35:38 +0930 > From: Tim <ignored_mailbox(a)yahoo.com.au> > To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Create virt F20 on new physical /dev/sda -> OK; boot live > F20 on /dev/sda now fails > Message-ID: <1401509138.1661.5.camel(a)fluffy.lan.cameratim.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 11:40 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote: >> but now for going from F19 to F20 and booting on the new F20 the >> process stops at: >> >> [OK] Reached target Paths >> [OK] Reached target Basic System > > I encountered the same stalling point, but with an ordinary install. > > Out of the two or three recent bouts of install grief, this one was due > to the device numbering. During install, thanks to booting from a DVD, > the install thought that the system root was /dev/sde instead > of /dev/sda, and configured things like that. Check your kernel line > in > the boot menu for the wrong device name, and either correct it, or use > the UUID of the drive partition, instead. > > Oddly enough the next entry in my grub.cfg file was for a recovery boot > mode, and that one had used the UUID, instead of the wrong device name. > > I'm not impressed with the current install routine, and that was just > one of the things about it that annoyed me. Ah . . well spotted - I should have seen that - thanks! > George Orwell's '1984' was supposed to be a warning against tyranny, > not > a set of instructions for supposedly democratic governments. A great (but sad) sig! Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: phil(a)pricom.com.au

1 0

error running gedit from cli after recent updates
by Pravin Singh 31 May '14

31 May '14

Good day I get the following error after running gedit from the commandline after a recent update. it works but gives the error I tried removing and re-installing but error persists. From the gui its fine. simple work around I use gedit filename 2>/dev/null which hides the error.? (gedit:2401): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_tree_view_get_cell_area: assertion 'gtk_widget_get_realized (GTK_WIDGET (tree_view))' failed (gedit:2401): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_get_origin: assertion 'GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed 3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64 gnome desktop GTk+ Adwaita could someone please help explain/ fix error yours sincerely Pravin -- *Dr P Singh* *S**enior Lecturer* *Mathematics* *UKZN* fax 086 637 8639 tel 031 2607686

2 1

Jump to page: