Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers ======================================================
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py
... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.am
I suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
Dan.
On 08/01/2013 03:55 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.amI suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
+1 to Mark and Toni :-)
Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
On 08/01/2013 09:55 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.amI suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
+1
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.amI suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe it's due to the summer season.
To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say, one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
Dan.
On Aug 8, 2013, at 11:00 , Dan Kenigsberg danken@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.amI suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe it's due to the summer season.
Likely. My late loud +1
To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say, one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
Sounds like the time is now…
Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michal Skrivanek" michal.skrivanek@redhat.com To: "Dan Kenigsberg" danken@redhat.com, "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, board@ovirt.org Cc: vdsm-devel@fedorahosted.org Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:53:50 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] suggesting new Vdsm maintaniner(s)
On Aug 8, 2013, at 11:00 , Dan Kenigsberg danken@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:55:07PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Nominating Toni Puimedon and/or Mark Wu as maintainers
During their recent year-or-two of participation in Vdsm development, both Toni and Mark has demonstrated a genuine care for the health and evolution of the the project.
They both carry this hard-to-quantify quality of serious-mindedness when reviewing patches.
Toni's 73 committed patches touch everything that is related to network configuration and reporting
27 vdsm/configNetwork.py 11 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 8 vdsm/API.py 8 tests/configNetworkTests.py 7 vdsm/netinfo.py 7 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 5 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py... similar to Mark's 80:
16 vdsm/configNetwork.py 12 vdsm/netconf/ifcfg.py 12 vdsm/libvirtvm.py 7 vdsm/clientIF.py 6 lib/vdsm/netinfo.py 5 vdsm/caps.py 5 vdsm/API.py 4 vdsm/vm.py 4 vdsm/netmodels.py 4 vdsm/Makefile.amI suggest that both of them obtain +2/-2 rights, in the understanding that they are to be used on net-related parts of the code. This is particularly important given my nearing, relatively long, vacation.
What do you say?
We've got no objectation, but neither an overwhelming support. Maybe it's due to the summer season.
Likely. My late loud +1
To me, it is important to tell whether Toni/Mark only reviewed a patch (+1) or are completely standing behind it, and going to fix bugs in it if the author is run over by a bus (God forbid).
Itamar and other board members: if there is no objection within, say, one week, would you grant the duo +2 rights?
Sounds like the time is now…
Agreed, delaying it just overloads Federico during the recent period. With adding new maintainers I hope we'll have more attendance in vdsm calls and contributes will receive faster response and help
Thanks, Yaniv Bronhaim.
Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
vdsm-devel@lists.stg.fedorahosted.org
-
Dan Kenigsberg -
Douglas Schilling Landgraf -
michal.skrivanek＠redhat.com -
Vinzenz Feenstra -
ybronhei＠redhat.com