we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
-- David Caro
Red Hat Czech s.r.o. Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Tel.: +420 532 294 605 Email: dcaro@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic RHT Global #: 82-62605
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com To: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:52:56 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
thoughts?
Thanks, Itamar _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote:
On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: > we have some very old gerrit patches. > I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to > begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). > they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their > closure. > > i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, > and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" > > thoughts? > > Thanks, > Itamar > _______________________________________________ > vdsm-devel mailing list > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of the posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the maintainer, and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it.
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short cycle (can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: > On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >> we have some very old gerrit patches. >> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to >> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their >> closure. >> >> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >> attention, >> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >> >> thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> Itamar >> _______________________________________________ >> vdsm-devel mailing list >> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > > It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of > the > posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the > maintainer, > and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it. >
yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short cycle
(can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com > Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to >>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their >>> closure. >>> >>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>> attention, >>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >>> >>> thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Itamar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >> >> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of >> the >> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >> maintainer, >> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons >> it. >> > > yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed > to > the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like > that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short cycle
(can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress.
Alon
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com >> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com >> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, >> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches >> >> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days >>>> (to >>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their >>>> closure. >>>> >>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>>> attention, >>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >>>> >>>> thoughts? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Itamar >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >>> >>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age >>> of >>> the >>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >>> maintainer, >>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons >>> it. >>> >> >> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed >> to >> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something >> like >> that. > > This will be annoying. > > And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying. Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
cycle (can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> > Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress. > > Alon >
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com > Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" > engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com >>> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com >>> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, >>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM >>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches >>> >>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days >>>>> (to >>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post >>>>> their >>>>> closure. >>>>> >>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>>>> attention, >>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >>>>> >>>>> thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Itamar >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >>>> >>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age >>>> of >>>> the >>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >>>> maintainer, >>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just >>>> abandons >>>> it. >>>> >>> >>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all >>> subscribed >>> to >>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something >>> like >>> that. >> >> This will be annoying. >> >> And there are patches that pending with good reason. > > pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no > rebase, > nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying. Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion. I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and contributer is the way to go. It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of anything blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally close the change if contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
cycle (can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> >> >> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor progress. >> >> Alon >> > >
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com >> Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" >> engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches >> >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com >>>> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com >>>> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, >>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches >>>> >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 >>>>>> days >>>>>> (to >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post >>>>>> their >>>>>> closure. >>>>>> >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>>>>> attention, >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old >>>>>> patches" >>>>>> >>>>>> thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Itamar >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>>>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >>>>> >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the >>>>> age >>>>> of >>>>> the >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >>>>> maintainer, >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just >>>>> abandons >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all >>>> subscribed >>>> to >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or >>>> something >>>> like >>>> that. >>> >>> This will be annoying. >>> >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason. >> >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no >> rebase, >> nothing)? > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying. Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion. I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and contributer is the way to go. It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of anything blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally close the change if contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
Personally I see nothing impolite about automatically abandoning patches if it is clear to contributors that this the expected behaviour. Other projects abandon automatically after a week and from what I've seen that is working well to get things in motion and get those interactions that you (and I) want, rolling.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within short
cycle (can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> >> >>> >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor >>> progress. >>> >>> Alon >>> >> >>
vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:09:46 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com > Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" > engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com > >> Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" > >> engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > >> > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > >>>> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, > >>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > >>>> > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 > >>>>>> days > >>>>>> (to > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post > >>>>>> their > >>>>>> closure. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually > >>>>>> get > >>>>>> attention, > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old > >>>>>> patches" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thoughts? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Itamar > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list > >>>>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > >>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > >>>>> > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the > >>>>> age > >>>>> of > >>>>> the > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the > >>>>> maintainer, > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just > >>>>> abandons > >>>>> it. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all > >>>> subscribed > >>>> to > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or > >>>> something > >>>> like > >>>> that. > >>> > >>> This will be annoying. > >>> > >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason. > >> > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no > >> rebase, > >> nothing)? > > > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t... > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any > comment > from any reviewer. > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather > than > let > them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying. Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion. I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and contributer is the way to go. It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of anything blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally close the change if contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
Personally I see nothing impolite about automatically abandoning patches if it is clear to contributors that this the expected behaviour.
It has nothing to do with polite, but build relationship between people and not force people to reopen important changes and explain them-selves every time a machine decides to.
Other projects abandon automatically after a week and from what I've seen that is working well to get things in motion and get those interactions that you (and I) want, rolling.
The herd argument is never accepted by me, the herd seldom has definite wisdom.
I would like maintainers to build human relationship with their contributers it is more important than having one or two extra changes in queue, as these relationships will serve us at other plains as well.
So our mission is indeed different... you are interested in rolling, while I am in creating ecosystem of people, which eventually will roll much faster.
The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone and gone.
So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree:
- If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within
short cycle (can be even a week). 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in.
> > > > >> > >>> > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor > >>> progress. > >>> > >>> Alon > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:09:46 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20:55 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:21:23 AM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
----- Original Message ----- > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com > > Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" > > engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > > > On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > > >> To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com > > >> Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" > > >> engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM > > >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > >> > > >> On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>>> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > > >>>> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com > > >>>> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, > > >>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > >>>> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM > > >>>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > >>>> > > >>>> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: > > >>>>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. > > >>>>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over > > >>>>>> 60 > > >>>>>> days > > >>>>>> (to > > >>>>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be > > >>>>>> lower). > > >>>>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party > > >>>>>> post > > >>>>>> their > > >>>>>> closure. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually > > >>>>>> get > > >>>>>> attention, > > >>>>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old > > >>>>>> patches" > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> thoughts? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>> Itamar > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel mailing list > > >>>>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > > >>>>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > > >>>>> > > >>>>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> age > > >>>>> of > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> maintainer, > > >>>>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just > > >>>>> abandons > > >>>>> it. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all > > >>>> subscribed > > >>>> to > > >>>> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or > > >>>> something > > >>>> like > > >>>> that. > > >>> > > >>> This will be annoying. > > >>> > > >>> And there are patches that pending with good reason. > > >> > > >> pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, > > >> no > > >> rebase, > > >> nothing)? > > > > > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t... > > > > so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any > > comment > > from any reviewer. > > lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather > > than > > let > > them get old and stay forever > > Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. > Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
I do not understand why maintainer should not have human interaction with its contributers.
I do not understand the relation between the subject and the things you're saying. Right now these patches are stale and are rotting, abandoning them could actually spur those interactions into motion.
You prefer machines to interact with contributers to kick them in motion. I believe that human interaction and discussion between maintainer and contributer is the way to go. It is much more polite and cooperative for maintainer that is not aware of anything blocking a progress to kindly interact with contributer and finally close the change if contributer is unresponsive and/or change has no value.
Personally I see nothing impolite about automatically abandoning patches if it is clear to contributors that this the expected behaviour.
It has nothing to do with polite, but build relationship between people and not force people to reopen important changes and explain them-selves every time a machine decides to.
Other projects abandon automatically after a week and from what I've seen that is working well to get things in motion and get those interactions that you (and I) want, rolling.
The herd argument is never accepted by me, the herd seldom has definite wisdom.
I would like maintainers to build human relationship with their contributers it is more important than having one or two extra changes in queue, as these relationships will serve us at other plains as well.
So our mission is indeed different... you are interested in rolling, while I am in creating ecosystem of people, which eventually will roll much faster.
I'm amused by your insistent efforts in trying to spin what I say and misinterpret my words. I am interested in exactly the same thing as you are. Practically though, you are not suggesting anything different than what exists today which is getting us today's results which neither you nor I are satisfied with. I am trying to change the dynamics and test what works to get things in the direction we both want them to, you are saying 'this is the way things should be' and are not willing to try new things that may actually get us there.
> > The problem is that maintainers avoid closing. > And that there are people who submitted patches without CC anyone > and > gone. > > So a simple logic can be applied after we add metadata into tree: > > 1. If no maintainer is CCed on change, close that change within > short > cycle > (can be even a week). > 2. Maintainer to close patches that have no interest in. > > > > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Maintainers can close patches that are no interest nor > > >>> progress. > > >>> > > >>> Alon > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > vdsm-devel mailing list > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >
on 2013/09/24 05:21, Ayal Baron wrote:
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com > To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com > Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, > vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches > > On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to >>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their >>> closure. >>> >>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>> attention, >>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >>> >>> thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Itamar >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >> >> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of >> the >> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >> maintainer, >> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons it. >> > > yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to > the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like > that.
This will be annoying.
And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
At least we all agree on that old patches should be abandoned.
I think we can do this in a semi-automatic way. A cron job checks the patch's freshness, and sends an email to warn the author and reviewers of an old patch. If the someone has a good reason to keep the patch, he can leave a comment on the gerrit web page saying "I want to #keep the patch# because ...". Then the system skips the patches whose last comment contains "#keep the patch#". If no one cares it, the patch is abandoned after some time.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng" zhshzhou@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: "Ayal Baron" abaron@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:16:16 AM Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
on 2013/09/24 05:21, Ayal Baron wrote:
----- Original Message -----
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:54:39 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com To: "Alon Bar-Lev" alonbl@redhat.com Cc: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com, "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
On 09/23/2013 01:49 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com >> To: "David Caro" dcaroest@redhat.com >> Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, >> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 1:47:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches >> >> On 09/23/2013 01:46 PM, David Caro wrote: >>> On Mon 23 Sep 2013 12:36:58 PM CEST, Itamar Heim wrote: >>>> we have some very old gerrit patches. >>>> I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to >>>> begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). >>>> they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their >>>> closure. >>>> >>>> i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get >>>> attention, >>>> and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches" >>>> >>>> thoughts? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Itamar >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> vdsm-devel mailing list >>>> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org >>>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel >>> >>> It might helpful to have a cron-like script that checks the age of >>> the >>> posts and first notifies the sender, the reviewers and the >>> maintainer, >>> and if the patch is not updated in a certain period just abandons >>> it. >>> >> >> yep - warn after X days via email to just owner (or all subscribed to >> the patch), and close if no activity for X+14 days or something like >> that. > > This will be annoying. > > And there are patches that pending with good reason.
pending for 60 days with zero activity on them (no comment, no rebase, nothing)?
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/status:open+project:ovirt-engine+branch:master+t...
so how does it help us to have these patches, some without any comment from any reviewer. lets get them reviewed and decide one way or the other, rather than let them get old and stay forever
Again... maintainer can close these if he likes. Owner can close these if he likes.
right, but why? a patch without activity being abandoned might actually spur someone into motion (rebasing and resubmitting, prodding maintainers etc). I'm +1 for automatically abandoning old patches.
At least we all agree on that old patches should be abandoned.
I think we can do this in a semi-automatic way. A cron job checks the patch's freshness, and sends an email to warn the author and reviewers of an old patch. If the someone has a good reason to keep the patch, he can leave a comment on the gerrit web page saying "I want to #keep the patch# because ...". Then the system skips the patches whose last comment contains "#keep the patch#". If no one cares it, the patch is abandoned after some time.
+1 for Zhou Zheng Sheng. Much better suggestion than automatically forgetting old patches by removing them. A reminder can be sent after couple of weeks or even a month, and auto abandon the patch if no response added to the bug within a week.
I like this suggestion if we want to add automation for this process (as we all prefer automation when possible), and it'll probably help a bit to clean our gerrit dash board
-- Thanks and best regards!
Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟 E-mail: zhshzhou@linux.vnet.ibm.com Telephone: 86-10-82454397
Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
Hi,
On 09/23/2013 12:36 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
I'm coming late to this discussion, but I see that there were some dissenting views from people who want maintainers to be able to store "in-progress" patches in Gerrit.
I am all in favour of treating Gerrit like we treat a bug tracker. If something is opened in the bug tracker, it should be a bug, an open bug is something to be fixed or closed, not to be left indefinitely. An open patch needs to be rejected, reviewed, revised or committed. I don't think Gerrit is the place for in-progress patches (use private branches for that).
Cheers, Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Neary" dneary@redhat.com To: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 12:07:45 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
Hi,
On 09/23/2013 12:36 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
I'm coming late to this discussion, but I see that there were some dissenting views from people who want maintainers to be able to store "in-progress" patches in Gerrit.
I am all in favour of treating Gerrit like we treat a bug tracker. If something is opened in the bug tracker, it should be a bug, an open bug is something to be fixed or closed, not to be left indefinitely. An open patch needs to be rejected, reviewed, revised or committed. I don't think Gerrit is the place for in-progress patches (use private branches for that).
Just point out that you can also use 'drafts' to store those in progress changes: http://gerrit-documentation.googlecode.com/svn/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotes-2.3...
Cheers, Dave.
-- Dave Neary - Community Action and Impact Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13 _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:16:09AM -0400, David Caro Estevez wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Neary" dneary@redhat.com To: "Itamar Heim" iheim@redhat.com Cc: "engine-devel" engine-devel@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 12:07:45 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] stale gerrit patches
Hi,
On 09/23/2013 12:36 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
we have some very old gerrit patches. I'm for abandoning patches which were not touched over 60 days (to begin with, I think the number should actually be lower). they can always be re-opened by any interested party post their closure.
i.e., looking at gerrit, the patch list should actually get attention, and not be a few worth looking at, with a "lot of old patches"
I'm coming late to this discussion, but I see that there were some dissenting views from people who want maintainers to be able to store "in-progress" patches in Gerrit.
I am all in favour of treating Gerrit like we treat a bug tracker. If something is opened in the bug tracker, it should be a bug, an open bug is something to be fixed or closed, not to be left indefinitely. An open patch needs to be rejected, reviewed, revised or committed. I don't think Gerrit is the place for in-progress patches (use private branches for that).
Just point out that you can also use 'drafts' to store those in progress changes: http://gerrit-documentation.googlecode.com/svn/ReleaseNotes/ReleaseNotes-2.3...
+1 for drafts. git review -D submits your patches as drafts.
vdsm-devel@lists.stg.fedorahosted.org
-
abaron＠redhat.com -
Alon Bar-Lev -
Dave Neary -
dcaroest＠redhat.com -
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden -
iheim＠redhat.com -
ybronhei＠redhat.com -
zhshzhou＠linux.vnet.ibm.com