389-users January 2008

389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

79 participants
110 discussions

[Fedora-directory-users] Centos5 does not install
by Maurizio Marini 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

As stated clearly here: http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users@redhat.com/msg02579.html linux distro should be support apache 2.0 not 2.2 m.

3 3

[Fedora-directory-users] FDS, Radius and Beyond
by Satish Chetty 11 Feb '08

11 Feb '08

Hello, This is a not a direct FDS question but I thought I will ask anyway. I want to issue digital certificates (stored and verified on FDS) to every laptop and desktop. When the laptop/desktop gets on the network and requests a DHCP IP address, I want the DHCP server to verify the certificate before access to the network resources is allowed. Something similar to the Hotspots in coffee shops and hotels but that uses certificates instead of login/password from user. Has worked on something like this or can point to me to such white papers? Cheers, -Satish.

4 3

[Fedora-directory-users] Mixing Directory Servers
by Jared B. Griffith 05 Feb '08

05 Feb '08

Is it possible to build and install a 1.1 instance and make it a slave of a 1.0.4 insstance?

3 4

[Fedora-directory-users] Random UID not found problem
by markwu＠micron.com 01 Feb '08

01 Feb '08

Hi, Some of our users get "UID xxxx not found" message when they open a new terminal or run a rsh command, it appears a few times a day and it is mostly just annoying message because users can continue to work as normal, however, sometimes It also causes cron jobs to fail, In system log, it shows, crond(pam_unix)[9225]: could not identify user (from getpwnam(USERNAME)) crond[9225]: User not known to the underlying authentication module We are using Fedora DS 1.0.4, and clients are RHEL 4.5 . This problem started ever since we switched into LDAP three months ago. Thanks

2 3

[Fedora-directory-users] heimdal and fds 1.1
by Doug Chapman 01 Feb '08

01 Feb '08

Can anyone point me to a wiki/doc on using fds and kerberos where the db is in the directory? (or maybe talk me out of this approach?) These steps are for openldap, but after much googling, I can't find a faq, or ready made schema file to try and wrestle this three headed dog into submission... http://www.h5l.org/manual/heimdal-1-1-branch/info/heimdal.html#Using-LDAP-t… tia

3 2

[Fedora-directory-users] FDS 1.1 fail to add configuration data to FDS1.04 DS
by Richard Hesse 31 Jan '08

31 Jan '08

I'm setting up a few v1.1 test instances in our current 1.04 environment but running into issues trying to add the configuration data to an existing 1.04 server. It appears to be trying to create the children entries before the parent: Are you ready to set up your servers? [yes]: Creating directory server . . . Your new DS instance 'fds' was successfully created. Creating the configuration directory server . . . dn: cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=aa0-002-6-v2.u.powerset.co m, ou=sv.powerset.com, o=NetscapeRoot objectclass: nsApplication objectclass: groupOfUniqueNames objectclass: top cn: Fedora Directory Server nsproductname: Fedora Directory Server nsproductversion: 1.1.0 nsnickname: slapd nsbuildnumber: 2007.355.1657 nsvendor: Fedora Project installationtimestamp: 20080130014937Z nsexpirationdate: 0 nsbuildsecurity: domestic uniquemember: cn=slapd-fds, cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=aa 0-002-6-v2.u.powerset.com, ou=sv.powerset.com, o=NetscapeRoot nsservermigrationclassname: com.netscape.admin.dirserv.task.MigrateCreate@fedo ra-ds-1.1.jar@cn=admin-serv-aa0-002-6-v2, cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn =Server Group, cn=aa0-002-6-v2.u.powerset.com, ou=sv.powerset.com, o=Netscape Root nsservercreationclassname: com.netscape.admin.dirserv.task.MigrateCreate@fedor a-ds-1.1.jar@cn=admin-serv-aa0-002-6-v2, cn=Fedora Administration Server, cn= Server Group, cn=aa0-002-6-v2.u.powerset.com, ou=sv.powerset.com, o=NetscapeR oot Error adding entry 'cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=aa0-002-6-v2.u.powerset.com, ou=sv.powerset.com, o=NetscapeRoot'. Error: No such object Could not register the directory server with the configuration directory server. Exiting . . . Log file is '/tmp/setupR29d4F.log' Checking the tree, the intermediate entries are not there. The script is not creating entries beneath ou=sv.powerset.com. I know that the DS is working b/c I can add new 1.04 instances to o=NetscapeRoot, and the 1.1 script is adding an ACI entry for SIE Group(fds) to o=NetscapeRoot. Do I have to upgrade the configuration server to 1.1 first? I'd rather avoid messing with it if at all possible. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. -richard

5 9

[Fedora-directory-users] Announcing Fedora Directory Server 1.1.0
by Rich Megginson 31 Jan '08

31 Jan '08

Fedora Directory Server 1.1.0 is now available. See http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes for details about new features and new installation procedures. What's new? * Auto UID and GID number generation with the libdna plugin - Distributed Numeric Assignment * Separate packages - each main component is in its own package - uses yum for installation * Filesystem Hierarchy Standard file/path layout (e.g. log files are under /var/log/dirsrv) * Init scripts! service dirsrv {start|stop|restart} [instance name] service dirsrv-admin {start|stop|restart} edit /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv or /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv-admin to set environment * Many of the components are now built into Fedora * The setup command is now /usr/sbin/setup-ds-admin.pl * startconsole is gone - use /usr/bin/fedora-idm-console instead * Migration from version 1.0 and earlier is fully supported by the /usr/sbin/migrate-ds-admin.pl script provided with the package * IcedTea Java runs the console on Fedora 8 and later - proprietary Java no longer required Known Issues * Binary packages are provided only for Fedora 6, 7, 8 and 9 - The Fedora 6 packages should run on EL5.1 (not 5.0) * Version 1.1 does not include the phonebook, gateway, or org chart web apps - those will be provided in a following release * Migration to Fedora 8 and later, and upgrading an existing Fedora DS on Fedora 8, requires LDIF files - binary database migration and upgrade from an earlier release to Fedora 8 or later does not work.

3 4

[Fedora-directory-users] How to transfer existing server FDS
by Сафонов Алексей 31 Jan '08

31 Jan '08

Greetings! At me the infrastructure with use FDS 1.0.4 is deploymented. There was a necessity to replace a server with FDS. Whether I can in any way to transfer FDS on a new server with preservation of all adjustments. For example, make archive the catalogue /opt/fedora-fs on a "old" server. Then to install rpm (fedora-ds--1.0.4-1. FC6.i386.opt.rpm) on "new" server. And, at last, to unpack archive in /opt/fedora-fs on a "new" server. Whether this algorithm will approach? Whether there will be problems provided that existing server FDS is synchronized with server ADS? I Ask the help

3 5

[Fedora-directory-users] RE: Migrating from 1.0.2 to 1.1, not all databases migrated
by Jeff Tharp 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

Argh, I figured out this problem was self-inflicted. I used too old a revision of the dse.ldif file as the basis for my migration. Updating to a newer revision (that included references to the missing backend) solved the problem. Thanks for the help and sorry to have wasted time with this. Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Tharp > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:40 PM > To: 'Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com' > Subject: Migrating from 1.0.2 to 1.1, not all databases migrated > > I'm working on migrating our Fedora DS 1.0.2 server to > FedoraDS 1.1. I did a same platform migration on test box by > installing the FedoraDS 1.1 binaries, taring up > /opt/fedora-ds from one of our old FedoraDS boxes and then > using migrate-ds-admin.pl to migrate the instance. While > NetscapeRoot and UserRoot were migrated correctly, the > mgration script skipped over our custom database entirely. > Now I can always export to LDIF and migrate this database > that way, I was hoping to do a direct binary migration to > minimize downtime. Are UserRoot and NetscapeRoot the only > databases supported, or is it likely that something was > misconfigured with my test? > > Any advice is appreciated, > Jeff Tharp > System Administrator > ESRI - Redlands, CA > http://www.esri.com

1 0

[Fedora-directory-users] Migrating from 1.0.2 to 1.1, not all databases migrated
by Jeff Tharp 29 Jan '08

29 Jan '08

I'm working on migrating our Fedora DS 1.0.2 server to FedoraDS 1.1. I did a same platform migration on test box by installing the FedoraDS 1.1 binaries, taring up /opt/fedora-ds from one of our old FedoraDS boxes and then using migrate-ds-admin.pl to migrate the instance. While NetscapeRoot and UserRoot were migrated correctly, the mgration script skipped over our custom database entirely. Now I can always export to LDIF and migrate this database that way, I was hoping to do a direct binary migration to minimize downtime. Are UserRoot and NetscapeRoot the only databases supported, or is it likely that something was misconfigured with my test? Any advice is appreciated, Jeff Tharp System Administrator ESRI - Redlands, CA http://www.esri.com

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users January 2008