389-users February 2010

389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

40 participants
48 discussions

Migrating from tivoli ldap to 389 ldpap
by serge sterck 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

I have just one problem left that prevent me to migrate from ibm tivoli to 389 ldap. The format of the birthdate i have generated a date AAAAMMJJHHMMSS with this format but 389 still refuse to add it must i encode this also in base64 to be able to use this format ? i have used this trick to add a space value to a attribute the syntax of birthdate is generralizetime #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 21 - birthdate: value #0 invalid per syntax ] dn: uid=f704,ou=users,dc=fmsb,dc=be objectClass: FMSBPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: extensibleObject objectClass: top objectClass: ePerson applicationprofile: RemoteHomeDirectoryModel=Fedora-Core-6 applicationprofile: X3270Profile=sessions:{a,b,c,d,e};a:{keyboard=encodage|c odering(mouse),host=fmsbo390.fmsb.be,type=CICS};b:{keyboard=encodage|coderi ng(mouse),host=fmsbo390.fmsb.be,type=CICS};c:{keyboard=encodage|codering(mo use),host=fmsbo390.fmsb.be,type=CICS};d:{keyboard=encodage|codering(mouse), host=fmsbo390.fmsb.be,type=CICS};e:{keyboard=encodage|codering(mouse),host= fmsbo390.fmsb.be,type=EOS} applicationprofile: internet=,ctx birthdate: 19550724000000 cn:: SmVhbi1NYXJpZSBHcsOpZ29pcmU= description:: SmVhbiBNYXJpZSBHcsOpZ29pcmU= employeenumber: 0704 firstname: Jean-Marie gidnumber: 501 homeDirectory: /home/f704 lastname:: R3LDqWdvaXJl loginShell: /bin/bash mail: mailareencoder(a)fmsb.be o: 306000 preferredLanguage: FR telephonenumber: 9806 uid: f704 uidNumber: 1704 userPassword:: ZGViaQ== -- Serge Sterck

2 1

Last problem before migrating from tivoli to 389 ldap
by Serge.Sterck＠fmsb.be 18 Feb '10

18 Feb '10

2 4

Learning about 389
by lunasilvermoon＠gmail.com 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hello, I been using linux for years and I got my family to use linux(forcibly hehe)and they love it. Well I am in college I recently took a class that uses Windows Active Directory, and I was wondering if there was something equilvent to linux. I heard the 389 prjoect was somewhat close to that, I have questions like can make roaming profile for users, can I configure window clients, and so on. Though I kinda want to get your guys opinion how you guys started with 389. Like should I buy book based on LDAP, should I take some class related to that, or relay on the internet to find all information. Thank you for your opinion.

1 0

Multi-Master Replication doesn't work after a while
by Fabio Isgrò 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hi All, I'm writing this mail to report a strange behavior in 389-ds when configured as MultiMasterReplication. The scenario is very simple an application use it as authentication base, the access to ldap server is regulated by a software load balancer with two nodes. The strange thing I noticed is every 48 hour the server must be killed and restarted beacause doesn't respond to any request but the port and the process are still alive, some times MMR stops due to an not existing conflict in some entry But today comes the disastrous thing over, MMR doesn't work anymore. Checking the error log on first node was reported a strange thing > [17/Feb/2010:13:11:45 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Replication agreement for agmt="cn=srvprd-l011v->srvprd-l012v" (172:389) could not be updated. For replication to take place, please enable the suffix and restart the server > [17/Feb/2010:13:13:25 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Total update aborted: Replication agreement for "agmt="cn=srvprd-l011v->srvprd-l012v" (172:389)" can not be updated while the replica is disabled > [17/Feb/2010:13:13:25 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - (If the suffix is disabled you must enable it then restart the server for replication to take place). > [17/Feb/2010:13:14:50 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=30964 op=3 repl="ou=ext,o=MYroot": Begin incremental protocol > [17/Feb/2010:13:14:50 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=30964 op=3 replica="unknown": Unable to acquire replica: error: no such replica > [17/Feb/2010:13:14:50 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=30964 op=3 repl="ou=ext,o=MYroot": StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=6 rc=0 > [17/Feb/2010:13:16:27 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Total update aborted: Replication agreement for "agmt="cn=srvprd-l011v->srvprd-l012v" (172:389)" can not be updated while the replica is disabled > [17/Feb/2010:13:16:27 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - (If the suffix is disabled you must enable it then restart the server for replication to take place). But either the replica and the suffix are already enabled !!!! The first thing I do is to restart the istance but print this Starting dirsrv: srvprd-l011v... 389-Directory/1.2.5 B2010.012.2033 srvprd-l011v.MYroot.com:389 (/etc/dirsrv/slapd-srvprd-l011v) [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] - 389-Directory/1.2.5 B2010.012.2033 starting up [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - _replica_init_from_config: failed to create csn generator for replica (cn=replica,cn=\22ou=ext,o=MYroot\22,cn=mapping tree, cn=config) [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] - replica_destroy [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Unable to configure replica ou=esterni,o=siae: failed to create csn generator for replica (cn=replica,cn=\22ou=ext,o=MYroot\22,cn=mapping tree, cn=config) [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program - _cl5CheckGuardian: found old style of guardian file: bdb/4.3/libreplication-plugin [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program - _cl5DBOpen: file d0bbdd82-1dd111b2-a05ca5d6-b0600000_4b699709000000010000.db4 has no matching replica; removing [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program - _cl5DBOpen: failed to remove (�ҷ�fU�) file; libdb error - 2 (No such file or directory) [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog program - _cl5DBOpen: opened 0 existing databases in /var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-srvprd-l011v/changelogdb [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - Found replication agreement named "cn=srvprd-l011v->srvprd-l012v, cn=replica, cn="ou=ext,o=MYroot", cn=mapping tree, cn=config". [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - The replication agreement named "cn=srvprd-l011v->srvprd-l012v, cn=replica, cn="ou=ext,o=MYroot", cn=mapping tree, cn=config" could not be correctly parsed. No replication will occur with this replica. [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmtlist_config_init: found 0 replication agreements in DIT [17/Feb/2010:13:32:47 +0100] - slapd started. Listening on All Interfaces port 389 for LDAP requests Due to business continuity I did restore the MMR as soon as possible and I must did it removing replicas and changelog to recreate it from the ground up. What Can I do to being MMR more reliable??? Best Regards Fabio Isgrò

2 1

yum repository and 389 Directory Server 1.2.5
by Chun Tat David Chu 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hi All, I have a quick question. I am using Fedora 12 and just installed 389 Directory Server yesterday. I followed the instruction on the yum installation guide, http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Install_Guide. - yum install 389-ds I am not sure why it installed 389 DS 1.2.3 instead of 1.2.5. I tried "yum upgrade" but no luck. I assume the reason is probably I am pointing at a wrong yum repository. Can someone please provide me with the address to the yum repository that has 389 DS 1.2.5? Thank you! David

2 2

Referential Integrity for memberuid
by John A. Sullivan III 17 Feb '10

17 Feb '10

Hello, all. I read in a post from 2006 that 389 does not support referential integrity for memberuid. That would seem like a great inconvenience. Has that been changed or is it still impossible? Is there any chance of it changing? I suppose we are a little spoiled in our environment in that uids are globally unique. I can see how this could be a problem when there are non-unique uids but, since referential integrity can be configured to take specific attributes, I was hoping we could enforce it in our case :-( Thanks - John

1 0

getent group returns empty group list
by John A. Sullivan III 15 Feb '10

15 Feb '10

Hello, all. I'm having a miserable time getting CUPS to work with Directory Server for group authentication. I think it is more fundamental than CUPS. When I do getent group <groupname> to a local group, the result is populated with members. However, if I do it for an LDAP group, the group is returned but with no members. What would cause such behavior? Do I need something other than default NSS mappings? I am running CentOS Directory Server 8.1 on CentOS 5.4. The client is running Debian Lenny. Thanks - John

3 5

Migrating to LDAP authentication
by Sean Carolan 12 Feb '10

12 Feb '10

Perhaps some of you have gone down this path before and can offer some helpful suggestions. I need to convert a group of servers to LDAP authentication. Most of the user accounts on these systems have consistent uids and gids across all the servers. There are a few exceptions but the people who need to access the servers on a daily basis should all have the same account uid on every machine. My questions are: 1. Can you disable local authentication for all users except root once LDAP authentication is in place? 2. If there are some users who only need access to a small number of servers, how would you handle that situation? 3. When adding new users, do you create them a private group to avoid this error? id: cannot find name for group ID 5001 Any other tips, tricks, or gotchas are most welcome!

7 34

Multiple sync aggrements between Ad and DS?
by Theodotos Andreou 12 Feb '10

12 Feb '10

Guys I' ve seen this warning on the 8.1 Administration Guide: WARNING There can only be a single sync agreement between the Directory Server environment and the Active Directory environment. Multiple sync agreements to the same Active Directory domain can create entry conflicts. Ref: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Windows_Sync.html In my scenario I have many OUs under the AD synchronized subtree eg ou=dep1,dc=example,dc=com , ou=dep2,dc=example,dc=com , etc. I tried to synchronize the whole subtree dc=example,dc=com to the respective tree on DS but this fails due to schema incompatibilities. So I created one sync agreement per OU and it seems to be working as expected in my test environment. What that warning above is all about? What could possibly go wrong if you use multiple sync agreements. How can there be entry conflicts if each synchronized subtree is different from the other? Another issue I have is that when users are disabled on the AD they are still active on the DS. An obvious workaround is to change the password of the disabled user so he can not use his account on AD but it would be nice if their is a solution to avoid this. Any ideas?

2 3

Directory Sync rename
by James Roman 11 Feb '10

11 Feb '10

We have what appears to be a single replication operation holding up all subsequent replication changes. We had a user who was added to our Active Directory with an incorrect name. The record was then synced down to our 389 DS server/FreeIPA. When the problem was discovered, it appears that someone attempted to change the records on both the AD and Directory Server between replication attempts. We are now stuck in a loop, where the Directory Server is trying to send the rename operation to the Active Directory, but it keeps failing due to receiving a referral (presumably because the rename operation has already occurred manually, but not sure). To make things worse, it appears that any subsequent changes are stuck waiting for this transaction to complete. How can I rectify a referral operation from my AD server. I assume that because I have only one LDAP connection to my AD servers that a referral will never work properly. How can I get around this issue? Is there a way to revoke this one change and have the Directory begin processing subsequent changes?

2 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users February 2010