cwg June 2015

cwg@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
2 discussions

Re: Seeking a mediator
by Rex Dieter 09 Jun '15

09 Jun '15

fyi, at michael's request, as wolfgang's sponsor, we had a chat last night. In short, I advised him to refrain from any further personal online (bz) comments, and highlighted expected behavior wrt the code of conduct. He's going to be taking a break from bz for awhile (until he cools down). -- Rex ________________________________________ From: cwg-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org <cwg-bounces(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> on behalf of Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 2:50 AM To: cwg(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Seeking a mediator On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 13:37 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The problem with that is that when you subscribe someone they have > full > access to the archives, so they can look back at any other stuff from > the past. :( > > So, I don't think thats too great an idea... Oh, yeah, I forgot the archive part. I'll mail Wolfgang later today and cc the private list. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

2 1

Seeking a mediator
by Michael Schwendt 01 Jun '15

01 Jun '15

Hello! Is there anyone, who could help with the following dispute? In particular, I think a reaction/comment from FAS user 'raveit65' is inappriopriate and ought to be much more friendly/respectful in the future. I've asked for an apology, but it has been denied. More than a year ago there has been this bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1074145 I've been involved both in that ticket with several comments and explanations and have talked also to upstream as a packager. Recently there has been a new bug report about exactly the same issue, which prompted 'raveit65' to make false claims and use a choice of words I cannot tolerate: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1226471 Quote: | This is a packager bug of audacious maintainer. | He ignores to apply a simple fix during package build. | Maybe you report force him to patch out nonsense unbuntu settings for audacious. 1.) It is not "a packager bug", because it has been added by upstream in 2012. 2.) I didn't ignore anything. I've responded quickly and multiple times. 3.) Talking about "forcing somebody" is a sign of hostility. If you cannot convince upstream (or don't even try to), force the packager instead? 4.) The word "nonsense" is another extreme. Upstream's rationale has been linked: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1074145#c3 And finally, placing me at the centre of his frustration/wrath is entirely inappropriate. Regards, -ms

3 6

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cwg June 2015