devel-announce September 2011

devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
9 discussions

Fedora 16 Beta is GOLD!
by Tim Flink 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

At the Fedora 16 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting yesterday, the Fedora 16 Beta release was declared GOLD! Fedora 16 beta will be released on Tuesday, October 4, 2011. Major thanks to everyone who made this happen. There is no way that we could have gotten all this done without everyone's hard work and assistance. Tim Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… ==================================================== #fedora-meeting: F15 Beta Go No Go Meeting Round 2.5 ==================================================== Meeting summary --------------- * Who's Here? (tflink, 21:03:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=713564&hide_resolved=1 (adamw, 21:09:08) * why are we here (tflink, 21:09:50) * We're here to see whether or not the beta release criteria have been met (tflink, 21:10:22) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 21:10:30) * current release blockers (tflink, 21:10:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=713564&hide_resolved=1 (tflink, 21:10:53) * that list doesn't take accepted/proposed into account (tflink, 21:11:02) * (725185) grubby doesn't add the initrd line at the kernel update (tflink, 21:11:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725185 (tflink, 21:12:04) * AGREED: - 725185 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem, but as long as the next kernel update requires this version of grubby, things should be OK and this potential issue can be fixed with an update post-beta. (tflink, 21:20:20) * (731529) grub making uefi calls without aligning stack pointer (tflink, 21:20:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731529 (tflink, 21:20:45) * AcceptedBlocker, ON_QA (tflink, 21:21:53) * AGREED: - 731529 - Move to VERIFIED - All of the EFI tests are pretty much working, other issues would have likely surfaced by now (tflink, 21:23:25) * (737731) Bootloader is left in F15 configuration when preupgrading to F16 (tflink, 21:23:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (tflink, 21:23:54) * AcceptedBlocker, ASSIGNED (tflink, 21:24:02) * AGREED: - 737731 - This needs to be fixed in F15 PreUpgrade and doesn't affect Beta compose. It doesn't appear to be in progress, need to revisit in the next couple of days. (tflink, 21:26:52) * (739253) unable to shut down from gdm greeter (tflink, 21:27:13) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253 (tflink, 21:27:19) * AcceptedBlocker, MODIFIED (tflink, 21:27:25) * AGREED: - 739253 - Move to VERIFIED - this has been fixed to the point that we expected - no power option in shell that fails. The power option will be restored in gnome-shell updates (tflink, 21:29:26) * (742207) No usable bootloader option during a text mode f15->f16 upgrade (tflink, 21:30:04) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742207 (tflink, 21:30:12) * Proposed Blocker, NEW (tflink, 21:30:22) * ACTION: adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 (tflink, 21:35:10) * AGREED: - 742207 - RejectedBlocker, CommonBugs - This doesn't directly hit any beta release criterion, isn't the most common upgrade path and can be worked around. The workaround needs to be documented (tflink, 21:35:22) * (742226) /sbin/grub2-probe: error: cannot find a GRUB drive for /dev/mapper/nvidia_cjfffajep2 (tflink, 21:36:37) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742226 (tflink, 21:36:44) * Proposed Blocker, NEW (tflink, 21:36:51) * AGREED: - 742226 - RejectedBlocker CommonBugs- BIOS Raid does work for some controllers but not all. Re-propose as final blocker and document for beta. (tflink, 21:44:21) * Test Coverage (tflink, 21:46:06) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_File_Path_Ks_Cfg (adamw, 21:47:27) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Hardware_RAID (adamw, 21:47:36) * AGREED: - only one exotic kickstart delivery method is missing from test coverage, and we provisionally suggest the stranger kickstart delivery methods should not be beta critical; therefore deeming test coverage effectively complete, as we would not block even if that test failed (adamw, 21:57:21) * Is Fedora 16 Beta Ready to Go? (tflink, 21:59:12) * QA is go for F16 Beta (tflink, 21:59:48) * RelEng is go (tflink, 22:00:10) * Devel is go (tflink, 22:00:41) * AGREED: - Fedora 16 Beta RC4 is accepted as beta (tflink, 22:01:35) * Open Discussion (tflink, 22:03:25) Meeting ended at 22:04:55 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 * tflink * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (145) * tflink (101) * nirik (37) * pjones (31) * jsmith (26) * zodbot (5) * jdulaney (4) * dgilmore (4) * Jsmith (3) * smooge (1) * satellit_ (1)

1 0

exiv2-0.22 coming to rawhide
by Rex Dieter 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

I'll be introducing exiv2-0.22 to rawhide next week, testing of affected packages is underday, and so far, so good... so I don't anticipate problems. repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src \ --whatrequires exiv2-devel | sort darktable-0:0.9.2-1.fc17.src geeqie-0:1.0-11.fc17.src gegl-0:0.1.6-2.fc16.src gipfel-0:0.3.2-10.fc16.src gnome-color-manager-0:3.2.0-2.fc17.src gnome-commander-3:1.2.8.13-2.fc17.src gpscorrelate-0:1.6.1-4.fc15.src gthumb-0:2.13.91-1.fc17.src gwenview-0:4.7.1-2.fc17.src hugin-0:2011.0.0-3.fc16.src immix-0:1.3.2-11.fc15.src kdebase-runtime-0:4.7.1-2.fc17.src koffice-3:2.3.3-9.fc16.src kphotoalbum-0:4.1.1-12.fc17.src krename-0:4.0.7-2.fc16.src ksnapshot-0:4.7.1-1.fc17.src libextractor-0:0.6.2-1602.fc17.src libgexiv2-0:0.2.2-2.fc15.src libkexiv2-0:4.7.1-1.fc17.src merkaartor-0:0.18.0-0.1.git654e49ba.fc16.src oyranos-0:0.3.1-1.fc16.src pyexiv2-0:0.3.0-5.fc17.src qtpfsgui-0:1.9.3-7.fc15.src rawstudio-0:2.0-1.fc16.src strigi-0:0.7.5-5.fc17.src ufraw-0:0.18-3.fc17.src

1 0

F16 Beta Go/No Go Meeting, Round 2.5, + report-out on yesterday's meeting.
by Robyn Bergeron 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for the second half of this important meeting. Thanks to the tireless* efforts of our outstanding QA folks, testing on RC4, created late yesterday, has been ongoing all night long. We'll be having the second-and-a-half round of our F16 Beta Go/No-Go TODAY. The first half of this meeting occurred yesterday[1][2], and it was decided that we would make a stretched effort to have another RC including fixes by midnight last night that looked viable, which actually happened. (Had it not been viable, we would have called it No-Go by midnight.) Thursday, September 29, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 16 Beta Blocker list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers -Robyn * Though I know you guys are *very* tired, and your work is MONDO appreciated. [1] Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… [2] Logs: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… Meeting Minutes from Go/No-Go Round 2.0: ==================================================== #fedora-meeting: F16 Beta Go No Go Meeting Round two ==================================================== Meeting started by rbergeron at 21:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… . Meeting summary --------------- * Who is here? (rbergeron, 21:00:53) * present: jdulaney, nirik, rbergero (rbergeron, 21:01:03) * Why are we here? (rbergeron, 21:01:47) * Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to see whether or not the beta release criteria have been met. (rbergeron, 21:02:28) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria (rbergeron, 21:02:43) * Current release blockers (rbergeron, 21:05:29) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (rbergeron, 21:05:38) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727522 (adamw, 21:08:57) * AGREED: 727522 is really fixed, the apparent rc2/rc3 reproducers were pilot error (adamw, 21:11:50) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (adamw, 21:11:53) * 737731 doesn't block f16 image creation, will get fixed by an F15 update. (rbergeron, 21:13:06) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741655 (adamw, 21:13:45) * AGREED: 741655 is not a beta blocker as it's a crazy custom partition layout, moved to final (adamw, 21:15:51) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741781 (adamw, 21:16:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741781#c19 provides an explanation of the two bugs, if you want a quickish catch-up (adamw, 21:18:29) * AGREED: If we have a built anaconda and RC4 by midnight pacific tonight, opt to do go/no-go tomorrow. Otherwise, slip one week. (rbergeron, 21:37:28) * if we don't have what is needed by midnight pacific, Robyn will send out the No-Go Mail. (rbergeron, 21:39:32) * ACTION: nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. (rbergeron, 21:39:48) * For status updates/questions, please check in #fedora-qa (rbergeron, 21:41:42) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741817 (adamw, 21:43:10) * AGREED: 741817 not a blocker as long as it leaves f15 install bootable, adamw will check that (adamw, 21:53:56) * Re-No/Go Meeting time (rbergeron, 21:54:13) * AGREED: will meet tomorrow, same bat time, same bat channel, to do final go/no-go decision. (rbergeron, 21:56:32) * robyn will be out tomorrow (rbergeron, 21:56:44) Meeting ended at 21:58:19 UTC. Action Items ------------ * nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * nirik * nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * rbergeron (142) * adamw (125) * jdulaney (28) * nirik (27) * dgilmore (26) * jsmith (24) * pjones (11) * VileGent (4) * zodbot (4) * tflink (3) * hno (3) * brunowolff (1) * tk009 (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

F16 Beta Go/No Go Meeting, Round 2.
by Robyn Bergeron 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 16 Beta Blocker list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers -Robyn

1 0

[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
by Tom Callaway 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Here are the latest changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines: --- The section of the Packaging Guidelines regarding Compiler Flags has been updated and improved, most notably, to document handling of PIE enabled packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags --- The prohibition against unnecessary explicit library requires has been updated with an example of when explicit library requires are useful and allowed. The example addresses packages that use features of a library added after the library initially adopted its current SONAME. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires --- An additional md5 implementation was added to the list of bundling exceptions: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries&… --- These guidelines (and changes) were approved by the Fedora Packaging Committee (FPC). Many thanks to Kevin Fenzi, Adam Jackson, and all of the members of the FPC, for assisting in drafting, refining, and passing these guidelines. As a reminder: The Fedora Packaging Guidelines are living documents! If you find something missing, incorrect, or in need of revision, you can suggest a draft change. The procedure for this is documented here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee#GuidelineChangeProcedure Thanks, ~spot

1 0

Fedora 16 Beta to slip by one week.
by Robyn Bergeron 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Late yesterday at the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta release of F16 by one week [1]. Minutes follow below. There are numerous unresolved blockers at this time [2], resulting in the inability to compose a viable release candidate. As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be pushed out by one week. We will proceed with having the F16 Beta readiness meeting today, 2011-09-22, as previously announced on the Logistics mailing list. We will have another F16 Beta Blocker Bug meeting this Friday. The adjustments to the F16 schedule will be done as soon as humanly possible, and published to the Schedule wiki page[3]. Thanks for your patience. We will be meeting again next Wednesday for another Go/No-Go meeting. -Robyn [1] Logs: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2011-09-21/f16_beta_go_no… Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2011-09-21/f16_beta_go_no… [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/Schedule ============================================ #fedora-meeting-1: F16 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting ============================================ Meeting started by rbergeron at 21:02:12 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2011-09-21/f16_beta_go_no… . Meeting summary --------------- * Gathering Bodies and Minds (rbergeron, 21:02:28) * Why are we here? (rbergeron, 21:03:53) * The purpose is to decide whether the *beta* release criteria hav ebeen met. (rbergeron, 21:04:34) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria (rbergeron, 21:05:13) * Remaining Blocker Bugs (rbergeron, 21:06:02) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (rbergeron, 21:06:14) * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738803 (adamw, 21:07:20) * LINK: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (adamw, 21:07:32) * Big outstanding bugs are 738803, 737731, 738964. (rbergeron, 21:07:59) * we have fixes for 738803, 738964, but landed recently and we dont' have a compose with them yet. (rbergeron, 21:09:55) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738964 (adamw, 21:11:52) * Unable to make system bootable due to bootloader choice (tflink, 21:12:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738964 (tflink, 21:12:20) * AGREED: - 738964 - AcceptedBlocker - This can cause lots of problems with existing disks and installations. The fix needs quite a bit of testing by nature (tflink, 21:19:12) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738803 (adamw, 21:19:27) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738803 (tflink, 21:20:21) * SELinux denial(s) prevent(s) gnome-shell from starting on F16 Beta RC1 (tflink, 21:20:30) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (adamw, 21:22:25) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (tflink, 21:24:17) * Bootloader is left in F15 configuration when preupgrading to F16 (tflink, 21:24:26) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866 (adamw, 21:26:41) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735866 (tflink, 21:27:25) * boot hangs with udevadm settle - timeout of 120 seconds (tflink, 21:27:34) * will make final call on 735866 staying as blocker or not on friday (rbergeron, 21:37:27) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737774 (adamw, 21:38:10) * AGREED: 737774 is a blocker (adamw, 21:41:05) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739258 (adamw, 21:41:13) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739258 (tflink, 21:41:27) * Graphical firstboot runs, even if /etc/sysconfig/firstboot has RUN_FIRSTBOOT=NO (tflink, 21:41:38) * AGREED: 739258: jsmith is sure about this one but no-one else can reproduce, ask jsmith to look into it more closely and re-evaluate on friday (adamw, 21:49:16) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739345 (adamw, 21:49:51) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739345 (tflink, 21:50:08) * pylorax throws an exception when used with fedora-logos-16.0.2 (tflink, 21:50:19) * AGREED: 739345 is a blocker as it can make it impossible to generate images (adamw, 21:55:48) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739910 (adamw, 21:56:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739910 (tflink, 21:56:28) * gnome-packagekit fails when trying to update - The package id's '' are not valid (tflink, 21:56:46) * AGREED: 739910 is not a blocker or nth as the affected gnome-packagekit is not in the beta frozen package set (adamw, 22:01:53) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253 (adamw, 22:02:19) * AGREED: 739253 is a blocker per criterion "All release-blocking desktops' offered mechanisms (if any) for shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work" (adamw, 22:07:37) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672023 (adamw, 22:07:48) * ACTION: adamw to follow up on 739253 with halfline (adamw, 22:07:58) * AGREED: 672023 does not hit any criteria, but it would be good to avoid getting crash reports from the live image with no trace: rejectedblocker, acceptednth (adamw, 22:12:56) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731549 (adamw, 22:13:34) * LINK: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/i18n (nirik, 22:16:57) * ACTION: adamw and dlehman to co-ordinate fix for 731549 with i18n team (adamw, 22:18:22) * Go/No Go (rbergeron, 22:21:30) * qa votes no, outstanding unresolved blockers in the current candidate build. (rbergeron, 22:22:45) * jsmith, rbergeron also vote no-go. (rbergeron, 22:22:51) * AGREED: We are a no-go for Beta. (rbergeron, 22:23:27) * We will regroup next Wednesday, same time, for another go/no-go, as well as having another blocker meeting Friday. (rbergeron, 22:23:47) * Release readiness meeting will happen tomorrow as planned. (rbergeron, 22:24:16) * ACTION: rbergeron to send out mail, notify, update the schedule. (rbergeron, 22:24:32) Meeting ended at 22:26:35 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to follow up on 739253 with halfline * adamw and dlehman to co-ordinate fix for 731549 with i18n team * rbergeron to send out mail, notify, update the schedule. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to follow up on 739253 with halfline * adamw and dlehman to co-ordinate fix for 731549 with i18n team * rbergeron * rbergeron to send out mail, notify, update the schedule. * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (179) * rbergeron (88) * tflink (57) * jsmith (46) * nirik (34) * zodbot (7) * dgilmore (4) * smooge (1) * satellit_ (1) * athmane (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

F16 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
by Robyn Bergeron 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Wednesday, September 21, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 16 Alpha Blocker list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers -Robyn

1 0

Fedora 17 Release Naming: Nominations are now open!
by Jared K. Smith 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10. Please submit your best ideas to the Fedora wiki at the address below: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Name_suggestions_for_Fedora_17 Please note that you *must* follow the instructions and guidelines at the page listed above if you want your name to be considered. For instance, there must be an "is-a" link between the name Verne (from Fedora 16) and the name you suggest. That link must be different than previous links for Fedora release names. Also, we ask that you please conduct the required searches for brand and trademark names that might cause us problems. Read the full guidelines at the wiki page listed above, where you can also find full schedule details for the release naming process. For those of you interested in reviewing the history of Fedora release names, there is an appropriately named wiki page for doing so at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/History_of_Fedora_release_names Please try to pick a name that is fun and creative. Don't delay... do it today! We all want an awesome name for Fedora 17! -- Jared Smith Fedora Project Leader

1 1

Outage: database and vpn server outage: 2011-09-07 21UTC
by Kevin Fenzi 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

Outage: database and vpn server outage: 2011-09-07 21UTC There will be an outage starting at 2011-09-07 21:00 UTC, which will last approximately 1 hour. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2011-09-07 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: Our primary postgresql server is being migrated from a RHEL5 to a RHEL6 instance. Our primary vpn server is being migrated from a RHEL5 to RHEL6 instance. The vpn outage should be very short as vpn resources are moved around. While the database is down, authentication to the wiki will be unavailable, but existing pages will be viewable. Bodhi, accounts, fedora community, pkgdb and Mirror Manager will not be available during this outage. Affected Services: Bodhi - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Fedora Community - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/ Fedora Account System - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ Mirror Manager - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ Package Database - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/ Wiki - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ (partially affected) Unaffected Services: BFO - http://boot.fedoraproject.org/ Buildsystem - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ DNS - ns1.fedoraproject.org, ns2.fedoraproject.org Docs - http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ Email system Fedora Hosted - https://fedorahosted.org/ Fedora Insight - https://insight.fedoraproject.org/ Fedora People - http://fedorapeople.org/ Main Website - http://fedoraproject.org/ Mirror List - https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/ Smolt - http://smolts.org/ Spins - http://spins.fedoraproject.org/ Start - http://start.fedoraproject.org/ Torrent - http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ Ticket Link: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2932 Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

devel-announce September 2011