docs-qa August 2019

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
9 discussions

[Bug 1706205] New: fedora 30 kde live image contains the squashfs image from fedora 27 and its gnome
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 May '20

26 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706205 Bug ID: 1706205 Summary: fedora 30 kde live image contains the squashfs image from fedora 27 and its gnome Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: about-fedora Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rob.verduijn(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When booting the recovery option you get the squashfs image from the image found in the LiveOS folder This is a gnome image (a bit strange on a kde live image) And it is from fedora27 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora 30 kde live image iso How reproducible: boot the recovery option from that iso and you will see Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: gnome squashfs image from fedora27 Expected results: kde squashfs image from fedora30 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1694217] New: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Nov '19

08 Nov '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694217 Bug ID: 1694217 Summary: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm trying to figure out how to test a 'dnf remove'. I tried 'dnf remove --dry-run' but dnf retirned "dnf remove: error: unrecognized arguments: --dry-run". The man page does not discuss how to perform a dry run. Please add a treatment for performing a dry run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1741653] Following instructions in official documentation results in unrecoverable data loss
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 Aug '19

19 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741653 --- Comment #4 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> --- Oh, sorry, I guess I forgot to paste the link. The current docs are here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f30/system-administrators-guide… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1741653] Following instructions in official documentation results in unrecoverable data loss
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Aug '19

16 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741653 --- Comment #3 from gatodiablo(a)protonmail.com --- The current docs are where exactly? I haven't found any. Re: your other question, keyctl list %:.builtin_trusted_keys does do something similar but it's not a 1 to 1 replacement. It only shows the fedora signing key whereas the old command showed all the system keys. I wish I knew what the command is to show all the keys, I've looked and looked and haven't been able to find it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1741653] Following instructions in official documentation results in unrecoverable data loss
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Aug '19

16 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741653 --- Comment #2 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> --- Oh actually, I just remembered we have an open issue specifically about this section on Pagure as well. Unfortunately I don't know much about kernel and I don't have the time to go track down someone who does. If you're knowledgeable about the subject, could you take a look at https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/system-administrators-guide/issue/11#comment-… and let me know what should go in there? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1741653] Following instructions in official documentation results in unrecoverable data loss
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Aug '19

16 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741653 Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swadeley(a)redhat.com Component|fedora-websites |system-administrator's-guid | |e QA Contact|web-members(a)fedoraproject.o |docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject |rg |.org --- Comment #1 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> --- Hi, the docs are indeed outdated, they're for Fedora 21 which was released in 2014 and EOLed in 2015. The current docs are here, can you please take a look and let me know if it's fine? Also, you might now be wondering why you landed at outdated docs. This is a long running problem, we don't unpublish documentation for releases that are no longer supported, but at the same time those docs tend to show up in search engine results and when you land on a page from a search engine, there's nothing except the URL indicating that you're looking at an old version. We have a couple issues open regarding this problem here: * https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/issue/116 * https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/docs-fp-o/issue/118 However, unfortunately I don't have an estimate for when they'll be fixed. Cheers, Petr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1284490] Link in Fedora 23 documentation refers to Fedora 21 documentation
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Aug '19

15 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284490 Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2019-08-15 13:50:42 --- Comment #1 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> --- Unfortunately I didn't see this bug when it was opened, and at this point republishing F23 docs would be way too much effort to fix a single broken link, so regrettably I have to close this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1352287] Typo in Section 5.7: Boxes tips and tricks.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Aug '19

02 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352287 Dayle Parker <dayleparker(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2019-08-02 07:25:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1361846] Typos & Reformulations needed
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Aug '19

02 Aug '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361846 Dayle Parker <dayleparker(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2019-08-02 07:24:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa August 2019