On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Paul Bolle pebolle@tiscali.nl wrote:
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 16:09 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Paul, your changes make some logical sense but they break the workflow of the people that have to maintain the package. That's where most of the pushback is going to come from.
(Did I sound annoyed about any pushback? I hope I didn't.)
No, not at all. And I didn't think you were. I was just offering extra context.
So perhaps I'll end up with the original patch here (ie, adding the "-s" flag) as the messages "make oldnoconfig" now generates hopefully aren't relevant for your workflow. We'll see.
I think that makes sense. We'd have to try them to be sure.
You're not, well, principally opposed to patches that make sense from the perspective of people rebuilding locally, are you?
Not opposed at all, but it can't be at the expense of people that have to do things with this package multiple times a day.
josh