lumberjack-developers November 2012

lumberjack-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org

3 participants
2 discussions

Few changes and questions
by Vratislav Podzimek 22 Nov '12

22 Nov '12

Hi everybody, I have made some minor changes in the wiki I'd like to let you know about. ==syntaxFormats== I have removed the </source> tag from the XML syntax example as it was making the example invalid. ==sampleXML== I have removed some duplicate words and added some missing in the comments and I've also fixed indentation of the <p:app>Tomcat</p:app> line. While reading the wiki, few questions came to my mind: 1) XML syntax example in the syntaxFormats section has <cee> as the root element. But Lumberjack XMLSchema has <Log> as root element. Where does this come from? It is quite confusing. 2) In the sampleXML, there is a part that is stated to have elements only from the BaseTypes group. However it includes <p:op> and <p:results> which cannot be found in the Lumberjack XMLSchema (although they can be found in the bindings sources). Am I misunderstanding what is meant by BaseTypes here? The same goes for the Common Criteria example. Thanks, -- Vratislav Podzimek Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic

1 0

question about field names
by David Lang 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

In working with the Simple Event Correlator developers on ways to support lumberjack style logs in that tool, an interesting question was raised about legal field names. Is it legal for a field name to start with a number? It's very common for languages to have rules about variable names that prohibit this, and in the case of SEC, it allows for some nice optimizations. As far as I know, no currently contemplated field names would violate this rule. thoughts? David Lang

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

lumberjack-developers November 2012