I have some idea on an article talking about installing Fedora 26 Alpha on the Raspberry Pi. This is the link to the pitch: < https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17440&preview=true&preview_id=17440%3E
I'm aware that we are near to the Beta release, so the article could quickly become outdated. I know that my English sucks, so someone will have to put hands on the article. In addition the article point to some specific tasks (i.e. accessing the RPi via serial console, and configuring wifi via command line), so I don't know if it should be more generic and do not deep too in some details.
That said: what do you think?
Ciao A.
It looks like an awesome idea to me. We can discuss it on the Thursday meeting.
Br,
2017-05-16 13:09 GMT-04:00 Alessio Ciregia alciregi@gmail.com:
I have some idea on an article talking about installing Fedora 26 Alpha on the Raspberry Pi. This is the link to the pitch: < https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17440&preview=true&preview_id=17440%3E
I'm aware that we are near to the Beta release, so the article could quickly become outdated. I know that my English sucks, so someone will have to put hands on the article. In addition the article point to some specific tasks (i.e. accessing the RPi via serial console, and configuring wifi via command line), so I don't know if it should be more generic and do not deep too in some details.
That said: what do you think?
Ciao A. _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 07:09:40PM +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
I'm aware that we are near to the Beta release, so the article could quickly become outdated. I know that my English sucks, so someone will have to put hands on the article. In addition the article point to some specific tasks (i.e. accessing the RPi via serial console, and configuring wifi via command line), so I don't know if it should be more generic and do not deep too in some details.
We should make sure to run this by Peter Robinson, who is doing much of the work in enabling the Pi.
Here you can find what can be considered a draft: < https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17440&preview=true&preview_id=17440%3E
Ciao A.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:56:33PM +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
Here you can find what can be considered a draft: < https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17440&preview=true&preview_id=17440%3E
Have you checked with Peter about this? Please don't publish without his feedback.
Also, I'd *really* like to see the section on Raspbian refocused and made more positive. It should also be rephrased to say that Raspbian isn't merely recommended by the Pi Foundation — it's the thing they *create*.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:56:33PM +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
Here you can find what can be considered a draft: < https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=17440&preview=true&preview_id=17440%3E
Have you checked with Peter about this? Please don't publish without his feedback.
Also, I'd *really* like to see the section on Raspbian refocused and made more positive. It should also be rephrased to say that Raspbian isn't merely recommended by the Pi Foundation — it's the thing they *create*.
I think Alessio (or someone) may have already reached out to Peter Robinson about this. Alessio, if you can please talk to him (pbrobinson on IRC, or pbrobinson@fp.o email), we would really be interested in publishing this right after the F26 GA. That gives you time to upgrade the article, not so much pressure at one time. What do you think?
2017-05-25 23:27 GMT+02:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: ... I think Alessio (or someone) may have already reached out to Peter Robinson about this. Alessio, if you can please talk to him (pbrobinson on IRC, or pbrobinson@fp.o email), we would really be interested in publishing this right after the F26 GA. That gives you time to upgrade the article, not so much pressure at one time. What do you think?
I contacted Peter some days ago. Someone else already contacted him before. He think that some things should be rearranged. But mainly he ask himself the purpose of such article, due to the fact that the topic was already covered in the magazine in a previous post where the author is indeed Peter https://fedoramagazine.org/raspberry-pi-support-fedora-25-beta/
Ciao A.
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:12:16AM +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
2017-05-25 23:27 GMT+02:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:42:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: ... I think Alessio (or someone) may have already reached out to Peter Robinson about this. Alessio, if you can please talk to him (pbrobinson on IRC, or pbrobinson@fp.o email), we would really be interested in publishing this right after the F26 GA. That gives you time to upgrade the article, not so much pressure at one time. What do you think?
I contacted Peter some days ago. Someone else already contacted him before. He think that some things should be rearranged. But mainly he ask himself the purpose of such article, due to the fact that the topic was already covered in the magazine in a previous post where the author is indeed Peter https://fedoramagazine.org/raspberry-pi-support-fedora-25-beta/
So in light of that... should we drop this article and try something else? Do you have another RasPi related topic you'd like to write about? Or a different idea?
magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Alessio Ciregia -
Eduard Lucena -
Matthew Miller -
Paul W. Frields