I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
The articles will use the latest Fedora Server with minimal installation for the OS. Unfortunately, the reader would need to use rpmfusion to install software like MPD and faad2 which are not included in the official Fedora repositories. Would there be any objections to this?
1. Audio Realtime Priority: - How realtime processing works and achieving bit-perfect playback by directing audio processes from source straight-to hardware using ALSA - How to configure RT priority to achieve low-latency audio performance by creating a file in /etc/security/limits.d/ - Basic command-line utilities for displaying info about audio hardware and playback (i.e. alsamixer and aplay) - Testing for bit-accurate playback with 'cat /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/sub0/hw_params'
2. Installing and Configuring MPD (Music Player Daemon): - Explaining what MPD is and how it works - Installing MPD - Configuring MPD - Connecting and playing music with ncmpcpp
3. MPD GUI Clients: - Basic instructions for installing and using popular MPD GUI clients: a) Cantata b) gmpc - Controlling MPD from a smartphone (finding apps in App Store and Google Play)
Maybe the DIY projects can be a monthly/quarterly theme? I'm hoping this idea will encourage and inspire other writers, and invite readers to submit ideas for DIY projects they might like to see.
Regards,
Shaun Assam IRC: sassam
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
Hi,
Well, I'm not sure that Jukebox has a different version without encumbered software. But the article can be published in the Community Blog if the Magazine finds it inadequate.
Cheers, Silvia
2017-11-09 0:13 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos
that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
It's interesting that there are a lot of clients in the fedora repos, but mpd itself is not. I'm trying to figure it out why? MPD is GPL licensed, so I can assume lack of packagers for it? Or Maybe a licensed dependency? Maybe if instead of using RPMFussion, the article do a quick compilation from the sources. I assume most of the problems come from the MP3 license issue (that is not an issue anymore), but need more research about it.
Br,
No Silvia, that's incorrect. The problems with legally encumbered software extend to any web property that's provided by the Fedora Project. This can't be published in the community blog, either.
Paul
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
Well, I'm not sure that Jukebox has a different version without encumbered software. But the article can be published in the Community Blog if the Magazine finds it inadequate.
Cheers, Silvia
2017-11-09 0:13 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Paul, Silvia, and Eduard.
Thanks for the encouraging ideas and feedback on the DIY Jukebox pitch. I had a feeling MPD might cause some controversy due to it's entanglement with some non-free packages. I thought because the MPD package was in the free portion of RPMFusion it had a chance for approval.
I did some research into MPD to try Eduard's suggestion on building the program from source. One of the dependencies for MPD is FFmpeg, and even though FFmpeg is licensed under GPL (or LGPL depending on the packages used), the "legal" page on their website states, "What we do know is that various standards FFmpeg supports contain vague hints that any conforming implementation might be subject to some patent rights in some jurisdictions..." (http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html). Based on the information from that page, I feel it would be best to play it safe and work with Paul's idea on an MPD-alternative to avoid any issues.
Good news is I've found one candidate for a server/client music player that is in the official Fedora repository called XMMS2. Bad news is I've never used it before, so I'll play around with it this weekend and let you know if it will work in the article.
Thanks again for your thoughts and support.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:10 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
No Silvia, that's incorrect. The problems with legally encumbered software extend to any web property that's provided by the Fedora Project. This can't be published in the community blog, either.
Paul
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
Well, I'm not sure that Jukebox has a different version without encumbered software. But the article can be published in the Community Blog if the Magazine finds it inadequate.
Cheers, Silvia
2017-11-09 0:13 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frield s.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople. org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.co m _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraprojec t.org
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject. org
Hi,
You can try Ampache (it's not in the repos, but there is a copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/ampache ) or Gmediaserver (It's in the repos).
Br,
2017-11-10 0:52 GMT-03:00 Shaun Assam thebeardedhermit@hotmail.com:
Hi Paul, Silvia, and Eduard.
Thanks for the encouraging ideas and feedback on the DIY Jukebox pitch. I had a feeling MPD might cause some controversy due to it's entanglement with some non-free packages. I thought because the MPD package was in the free portion of RPMFusion it had a chance for approval.
I did some research into MPD to try Eduard's suggestion on building the program from source. One of the dependencies for MPD is FFmpeg, and even though FFmpeg is licensed under GPL (or LGPL depending on the packages used), the "legal" page on their website states, "What we do know is that various standards FFmpeg supports contain vague hints that any conforming implementation might be subject to some patent rights in some jurisdictions..." (http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html). Based on the information from that page, I feel it would be best to play it safe and work with Paul's idea on an MPD-alternative to avoid any issues.
Good news is I've found one candidate for a server/client music player that is in the official Fedora repository called XMMS2. Bad news is I've never used it before, so I'll play around with it this weekend and let you know if it will work in the article.
Thanks again for your thoughts and support.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:10 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
No Silvia, that's incorrect. The problems with legally encumbered software extend to any web property that's provided by the Fedora Project. This can't be published in the community blog, either.
Paul
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
Well, I'm not sure that Jukebox has a different version without encumbered software. But the article can be published in the Community Blog if the Magazine finds it inadequate.
Cheers, Silvia
2017-11-09 0:13 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frield s.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople. org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.co m _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraprojec t.org
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject. org
Hi Eduard,
Thanks for the suggestions.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 10:52 -0300, Eduard Lucena wrote:
Hi,
You can try Ampache (it's not in the repos, but there is a copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bowlofeggs/ampache ) or Gmediaserver (It's in the repos).
Br,
2017-11-10 0:52 GMT-03:00 Shaun Assam thebeardedhermit@hotmail.com:
Hi Paul, Silvia, and Eduard.
Thanks for the encouraging ideas and feedback on the DIY Jukebox pitch. I had a feeling MPD might cause some controversy due to it's entanglement with some non-free packages. I thought because the MPD package was in the free portion of RPMFusion it had a chance for approval.
I did some research into MPD to try Eduard's suggestion on building the program from source. One of the dependencies for MPD is FFmpeg, and even though FFmpeg is licensed under GPL (or LGPL depending on the packages used), the "legal" page on their website states, "What we do know is that various standards FFmpeg supports contain vague hints that any conforming implementation might be subject to some patent rights in some jurisdictions..." (http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html). Based on the information from that page, I feel it would be best to play it safe and work with Paul's idea on an MPD-alternative to avoid any issues.
Good news is I've found one candidate for a server/client music player that is in the official Fedora repository called XMMS2. Bad news is I've never used it before, so I'll play around with it this weekend and let you know if it will work in the article.
Thanks again for your thoughts and support.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 13:10 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
No Silvia, that's incorrect. The problems with legally encumbered software extend to any web property that's provided by the Fedora Project. This can't be published in the community blog, either.
Paul
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
Well, I'm not sure that Jukebox has a different version without encumbered software. But the article can be published in the Community Blog if the Magazine finds it inadequate.
Cheers, Silvia
2017-11-09 0:13 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com :
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 06:59:48AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
I would like to pitch a DIY project to show readers how they can recycle their old computers into a dedicated digital jukebox. The articles will be in three parts, one article a week, and could be published before the holidays in December. This is based on the suggestion for a December audio theme as a Fedora Magazine Editorial - thanks Eduard.
[...snip...]
I love the spirit of hte article, but we don't publish tips on repos that have legally encumbered software. Is there a way to do this with a jukebox that only has unencumbered software?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.fr ield s.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com// - - - - http://pfrields.fedorape ople. org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensourc e.co m _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject. org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedorapr ojec t.org
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.or g To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproj ect. org
-- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56975687314 GNU/Linux User #589060 Ubuntu User #8749 Fedora Ambassador Latam _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.or g
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 03:52:19AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, Silvia, and Eduard.
Thanks for the encouraging ideas and feedback on the DIY Jukebox pitch. I had a feeling MPD might cause some controversy due to it's entanglement with some non-free packages. I thought because the MPD package was in the free portion of RPMFusion it had a chance for approval.
*Nod. It's important to distinguish "free" from "legally encumbered" in this case. It's possible to create 100% free and open source software that also, for example, reads on patents. Because we observe those restrictions, we can't promote that type of free software. "Nonfree" software, on the other hand, may be free of such legal encumbrances, but available only under a nonfree license that prevents us from distributing it.
I did some research into MPD to try Eduard's suggestion on building the program from source. One of the dependencies for MPD is FFmpeg, and even though FFmpeg is licensed under GPL (or LGPL depending on the packages used), the "legal" page on their website states, "What we do know is that various standards FFmpeg supports contain vague hints that any conforming implementation might be subject to some patent rights in some jurisdictions..." (http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html). Based on the information from that page, I feel it would be best to play it safe and work with Paul's idea on an MPD-alternative to avoid any issues.
Good news is I've found one candidate for a server/client music player that is in the official Fedora repository called XMMS2. Bad news is I've never used it before, so I'll play around with it this weekend and let you know if it will work in the article.
Thanks again for your thoughts and support.
Awesome news. I continue to think this has the makings of a great article so I applaud your efforts!
Hi everyone,
I've had success in creating a Digital Jukebox using Fedora Server and XMMS2 using only the official Fedora repo. I've updated the pitch submission to reflect the changes at https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=1927 7&preview=1&_ppp=81e0b7e700
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 14:41 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 03:52:19AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, Silvia, and Eduard.
Thanks for the encouraging ideas and feedback on the DIY Jukebox pitch. I had a feeling MPD might cause some controversy due to it's entanglement with some non-free packages. I thought because the MPD package was in the free portion of RPMFusion it had a chance for approval.
*Nod. It's important to distinguish "free" from "legally encumbered" in this case. It's possible to create 100% free and open source software that also, for example, reads on patents. Because we observe those restrictions, we can't promote that type of free software. "Nonfree" software, on the other hand, may be free of such legal encumbrances, but available only under a nonfree license that prevents us from distributing it.
I did some research into MPD to try Eduard's suggestion on building the program from source. One of the dependencies for MPD is FFmpeg, and even though FFmpeg is licensed under GPL (or LGPL depending on the packages used), the "legal" page on their website states, "What we do know is that various standards FFmpeg supports contain vague hints that any conforming implementation might be subject to some patent rights in some jurisdictions..." (http://www.ffmpeg.org/legal.html). Based on the information from that page, I feel it would be best to play it safe and work with Paul's idea on an MPD-alternative to avoid any issues.
Good news is I've found one candidate for a server/client music player that is in the official Fedora repository called XMMS2. Bad news is I've never used it before, so I'll play around with it this weekend and let you know if it will work in the article.
Thanks again for your thoughts and support.
Awesome news. I continue to think this has the makings of a great article so I applaud your efforts!
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:17:04AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've had success in creating a Digital Jukebox using Fedora Server and XMMS2 using only the official Fedora repo. I've updated the pitch submission to reflect the changes at https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=1927 7&preview=1&_ppp=81e0b7e700
This is great Shaun!
Could I ask you to do one thing? Split the RT setup article (the first 1/3 of the proposal) into its own separate article. We'd publish this first. The reason is that I think this will be useful for other articles based on JACK.
Then you could do the other 2/3 of the article as another piece which we'd also publish, a day or two later.
There is a bonus here which is you get two bylines, and we also get two articles for the price of one. ;-) Sound OK?
Hi Paul, thanks for the feedback. I forgot to mention in the pitch that the three items are three separate articles, so I'm definitely on- board with your suggestion. I agree that it would be better to combine the second and third parts into one so readers can have their server and client ready at the same time.
I'm glad to see the idea go through and should have a draft for the first article ready for your review by this weekend.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 17:50 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:17:04AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've had success in creating a Digital Jukebox using Fedora Server and XMMS2 using only the official Fedora repo. I've updated the pitch submission to reflect the changes at https://fedoramagazine.org/?p= 1927 7&preview=1&_ppp=81e0b7e700
This is great Shaun!
Could I ask you to do one thing? Split the RT setup article (the first 1/3 of the proposal) into its own separate article. We'd publish this first. The reason is that I think this will be useful for other articles based on JACK.
Then you could do the other 2/3 of the article as another piece which we'd also publish, a day or two later.
There is a bonus here which is you get two bylines, and we also get two articles for the price of one. ;-) Sound OK?
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:45:33AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, thanks for the feedback. I forgot to mention in the pitch that the three items are three separate articles, so I'm definitely on- board with your suggestion. I agree that it would be better to combine the second and third parts into one so readers can have their server and client ready at the same time.
I'm glad to see the idea go through and should have a draft for the first article ready for your review by this weekend.
Fantastic. Thanks Shaun, looking forward to it!
Hi Paul,
Sorry for the slight delay in getting the draft ready. I felt it needed improvements and wanted to submit something good.
The first part is ready for review at: https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=19277&preview=1&_ppp=5ad7bd8cb9
Let me know if anything needs to be edited or improved.
The second part needs some fixing and finalizing. I should have it ready for review before the end of the week.
Thanks,
Shaun Assam
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:45 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:45:33AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, thanks for the feedback. I forgot to mention in the pitch that the three items are three separate articles, so I'm definitely on- board with your suggestion. I agree that it would be better to combine the second and third parts into one so readers can have their server and client ready at the same time.
I'm glad to see the idea go through and should have a draft for the first article ready for your review by this weekend.
Fantastic. Thanks Shaun, looking forward to it!
Hi Paul,
Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at https: //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558
Let me know if it requires additional editing.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 08:45 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 05:45:33AM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, thanks for the feedback. I forgot to mention in the pitch that the three items are three separate articles, so I'm definitely on- board with your suggestion. I agree that it would be better to combine the second and third parts into one so readers can have their server and client ready at the same time.
I'm glad to see the idea go through and should have a draft for the first article ready for your review by this weekend.
Fantastic. Thanks Shaun, looking forward to it!
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul,
Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at https: //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558
Let me know if it requires additional editing.
Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1 which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on.
For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time component is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll want to cover in Part 2 for sure.
Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I knew going into the article some people might not understand the technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener.
It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining with, “By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able to fix this post-publish?
I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's relation to the second part.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:07 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul,
Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at https: //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558
Let me know if it requires additional editing.
Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1 which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on.
For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time component is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll want to cover in Part 2 for sure.
Part 2 has been updated to clarify the objectives and tasks presented in part 1. Let me know if you feel it requires further revisions.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 15:15 +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I knew going into the article some people might not understand the technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener.
It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining with, “By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able to fix this post-publish?
I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's relation to the second part.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:07 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul,
Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at https: //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558
Let me know if it requires additional editing.
Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1 which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on.
For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time component is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll want to cover in Part 2 for sure.
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.or g
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:15:01PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I knew going into the article some people might not understand the technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener.
It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining with, “By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able to fix this post-publish?
I did fix that the other day when I saw your comment. Thanks!
I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's relation to the second part.
Thanks Shaun!
magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org