Well, almost every page, blog and or magazine, have an article about text editors, and even when is probable that I will repeat some of their work, I want to focus this not just in highligth the features, but really compare them in terms of performance, memory usage. One comment I like to hear about it is: Where is the line that divide text editors from IDEs?
I will split the article in 2 main sections:
- CLI text editors - Vi/Vim - Nano - emacs - Jed Editor - The nice editor (ne) - mcedit
- GUI text editors - gVim - Atom - Sublime Text - gedit - Kate/Kwrite - Geany - Bluefish - The Code Editor - Scribes - Nedit - Tea - jEdit - Leaf Pad - Lime Text - SciTE
If I'm missing one, please add it (if you add a link, better).
I hope you like the idea, and understand that this will require some time to be finished.
On 02/25/2017 01:18 AM, Eduard Lucena wrote:
Well, almost every page, blog and or magazine, have an article about text editors, and even when is probable that I will repeat some of their work, I want to focus this not just in highligth the features, but really compare them in terms of performance, memory usage. One comment I like to hear about it is: Where is the line that divide text editors from IDEs?
I will split the article in 2 main sections:
CLI text editors
Vi/Vim
- Nano
- emacs
- Jed Editor
- The nice editor (ne)
- mcedit
GUI text editors
gVim
- Atom
- Sublime Text
- gedit
- Kate/Kwrite
- Geany
- Bluefish
- The Code Editor
- Scribes
- Nedit
- Tea
- jEdit
- Leaf Pad
- Lime Text
- SciTE
If I'm missing one, please add it (if you add a link, better).
I hope you like the idea, and understand that this will require some time to be finished.
Hi,
it might be also worth mentioning the neovim project and neovim-qt as its GUI counterpart. I've been using it for months without any problem and both of them are available in Copr repositories.
Neovim: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dperson/neovim/ Neovim-qt: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/msehnout/Neovim-qt/
Regards,
magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org