mono August 2009

mono@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
10 discussions

.NET development catagory
by David Nielsen 30 Aug '09

30 Aug '09

I've noticed when using the install DVD recently that I in the development section there is no entry for .NET development tools. This seems like an easy improvement we could make for .NET users on Fedora by adding a bit of visibility. However I am not familiar with how to go about doing this, indications are that we need to edit the comps file. Anyone know what the procedure is for getting such a change into Fedora? - David

2 1

mono-uia in Fedora 12
by Stephen Shaw 27 Aug '09

27 Aug '09

I was wondering if it would be possible to get the mono-uia stuff into Fedora 12? There was work to get it into 11, but gtk-sharp was one rev to old (2.12.7 If I remember right) Thanks, Stephen

4 9

Test message, please ignore
by Michel Alexandre Salim 26 Aug '09

26 Aug '09

I've just introduced a sending rule to block spams pretending to be the mailing list itself from sending messages. Verifying to see if it does not discard valid mail. -- Michel Salim <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org> GPG key ID: 78884778 IRC: hircus Package Sponsor, Fedora Project

2 2

Surveying active Fedora Mono packagers
by Michel Alexandre Salim 26 Aug '09

26 Aug '09

Hi all, It would be nice to know how many active Fedora packagers are on this list. There have been communication issues in the past (see fedora-devel list), with some important bulk updates being obsoleted because individual maintainers push newer updates before the old ones have a chance of hitting stable. If you could respond with: - packages currently maintained - packages currently comaintained - packages you would like to see added - other responsibilities you might be willing to take on The mailing list is currently administered by David -- David, are you considering coming back to packaging work? Otherwise, we might need someone who can coordinate the current packagers to administer the list. Responsibilities would include, for instance, trying to make sure that any new Mono packager get inducted into this list. My entry: Michel Salim / salimma(a)fedoraproject.org / hircus Packages maintained: gnome-keyring-sharp Packages comaintained: banshee gnome-do, gnome-do-plugins Might volunteer for: coordinating work Thanks, -- Michel

9 19

First results from Mono packaging rework
by Michel Alexandre Salim 26 Aug '09

26 Aug '09

Installing F-spot on a system without Mono installed went down from 23 MB to 15 MB. All achieved by shuffling some binaries and assemblies around the subpackages. More details here: http://identi.ca/notice/8827856 -- and should be aggregated to Fedora Planet in the fullness of time. The question is whether we should push this to F-11 or not. F-11 is currently on Mono 2.4; F-12 on 2.4.2.3 . I'm *assuming* there is no assembly version bump between the two, but I'm not sure. Does anyone have an F-11 machine and can help verify this? Do a scratch F-11 build of the new F-12 Mono SRPM -- get it from here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129110 and see if you could get it installed without affecting packages such as banshee, f-spot, tomboy. Thanks, -- Michel Salim <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org> GPG key ID: 78884778 IRC: hircus Package Sponsor, Fedora Project

4 4

status of pending F11 ppc64-related updates
by Christian Krause 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Hi Xavier, Hi Toshio, Hi All, I've seen that the issue with the obsoleted bulk update of mono packages got recently some attention on fedora-devel: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg01096.html There are some more mono packages tagged with dist-f11-override which are not pushed to updates(-testing) for quite some time (and which are not in this obsoleted bulk update). Specifically I'm interested in the following packages, since they are blocking me from pushing out an update of f-spot: package: f-spot-0.6.0.0-1.fc11.ppc64 from fedora-updates-testing-11-ppc64 unresolved deps: mono(NDesk.DBus.GLib) = 0:1.0.0.0 mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = 0:0.4.0.0 mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.4.0.0 mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = 0:0.4.0.0 mono(NDesk.DBus) = 0:1.0.0.0 Toshio, Xavier: What's the current status of pushing out all of these packages? If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. Thanks in advance! Best regards, Christian

2 1

Going to request ppc64 rebuilds are pushed stable today
by Toshio Kuratomi 25 Aug '09

25 Aug '09

Hey everyone, I'm going to request the current ppc64 rebuilds for F11 are pushed to stable today. they'll be live after the queue is processed again. I haven't looked into the NDesk and other dependencies of tomboy yet -- I'll look into building them for testing today. -Toshio

1 0

Coordinating Mono packaging on fedora-mono
by Michel Alexandre Salim 22 Aug '09

22 Aug '09

Dear all, You're getting this email as comaintainers of Fedora's core mono package, to invite you to join the fedora-mono mailing list: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mono David Nielsen started this list a few months ago with the intention of coordinating improvements to Fedora's Mono stack (and as a place to help bootstrap new packagers), but unfortunately he has curtailed his Fedora involvement, and the list (and Mono work) has been in limbo ever since. If you could join the list -- if you're not on it already -- it would be greatly appreciated. Apologies if you're already on it; David still runs the list so I cannot get the subscribers information. Regards, -- Michel Salim <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org> GPG key ID: 78884778 IRC: hircus Package Sponsor, Fedora Project

2 3

bug in mono-addins blocks f-spot update
by Christian Krause 21 Aug '09

21 Aug '09

Hello, in order to push f-spot from updates-testing to stable I need the following bug in mono-addins to get fixed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514936 The problem is in short, that the mono-addins code throws an exception if no local addins are found which prevents f-spot to find even its global addins. The bug report already contains a patch which I've ported from a newer version of the mono-addins package. I've already asked Paul Johnson, the maintainer of mono-addins, to apply my fix and/or approve my request for commit permissions for mono-addins, but unfortunately he hasn't responded for 3 weeks - probably he's on vacation. ;-) Would it be an option if somebody with provenpackagers status could apply this small fix and push out a new release of mono-addins (only Fedora 10 is affected)? Or what other options do I have? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Christian

3 5

updating boo
by Paul Lange 03 Aug '09

03 Aug '09

Hey, I'm trying to update boo to the latest version (0.9.1). Most things work fine but I get a strange stacktrace while trying to register some assemblies into the gac. You can find the src-rpm package and the mock build.log here: http://palango.fedorapeople.org/boo/ I hope somebody can help me or at least give some hints :) regards, Paul

3 7

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

mono August 2009