I want to bring back ocaml-calimages since it is a build dependency
of free tennis. I used the current ocaml template mixed a bit with the
previous spec file to create the proposed new spec file.
While I'd really like an official review, even a quick looksee from someone
that works with ocaml regularly (which I don't), for obvious issues
would be appreciated.
Thanks.
The review bug is at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785727
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Provide native systemd service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789784
Summary: Provide native systemd service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: mldonkey
AssignedTo: lemenkov(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: johannbg(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
fedora-ocaml-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
Let's get the ball rolling on this one...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemdhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines:Systemdhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Incomplete packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785680
Summary: Incomplete packaging
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Component: ocaml-deriving
AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: 5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-ocaml-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 558296
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=558296
two files ... "Makefile" and "Main.ml"
Description of problem:
I cannot link libraries provided by "ocaml-deriving-devel" package.
Which Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. sudo yum install ocaml-deriving-devel
2. tar xvzf deriving.tar.gz
2. cd deriving
3. make && ./main
Actual results:
ocamlc -c -pp "camlp4of -I /usr/lib64/ocaml/deriving pa_deriving.cma"
-I /usr/lib64/ocaml/deriving nums.cma Main.ml
Camlp4: Uncaught exception: DynLoader.Error
("pa_deriving.cma", "file not found in path")
File "Main.ml", line 1, characters 0-1:
Error: Preprocessor error
make: *** [Main.cmo] Error 2
Expected results:
ocamlc -c -pp "camlp4of -I ~/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/deriving-ocsigen
pa_deriving.cma" -I ~/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/deriving-ocsigen nums.cma
Main.ml
ocamlc -o main -I ~/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/deriving-ocsigen nums.cma
deriving.cma Main.cmo
len(s) = 15; s = test
s' = {a = 30; b = "test"}
Additional info:
The following (relevant) file:
/usr/lib64/ocaml/deriving/META
has suspicious contents.
name="deriving"
version="0.1.1a"
requires="%{camlp4}"
description="%{description}"
# need a syntax here XXX
Compare it with analogous file
/home/mkosik/lib/godi/lib/ocaml/pkg-lib/deriving-ocsigen/META
provided by GODI:
version = "0.2-ocsigen"
description = "Deriving (patched for the Ocsigen project)"
requires = "num"
archive(byte) = "deriving.cma"
archive(native) = "deriving.cmxa"
package "syntax" (
requires(syntax) = "camlp4,unix"
requires(syntax,toploop) += "deriving-ocsigen"
archive(preprocessor,syntax) = "pa_deriving.cma"
archive(syntax,toploop) = "pa_deriving.cma"
package "base" (
requires(syntax) = "camlp4"
archive(preprocessor,syntax) = "pa_deriving_common.cmo pa_deriving.cmo"
archive(syntax,toploop) = "pa_deriving_common.cmo pa_deriving.cmo"
)
)
package "syntax_tc" (
exists_if = "pa_deriving_tc.cma"
requires(syntax) = "camlp4,unix,type-conv"
requires(syntax,toploop) += "deriving-ocsigen"
archive(preprocessor,syntax) = "pa_deriving_tc.cma"
archive(syntax,toploop) = "pa_deriving_tc.cma"
package "base" (
requires(syntax) = "camlp4"
archive(preprocessor,syntax) = "pa_deriving_common.cmo pa_deriving_tc.cmo"
archive(syntax,toploop) = "pa_deriving_common.cmo pa_deriving_tc.cmo"
)
)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(kseifried@redhat.
| |com)
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> 2012-02-07 03:18:29 EST ---
Are we proposing to fix this for RHEL too? There are
no OCaml applications in RHEL which are vulnerable to this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried <kseifried(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |787889
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried <kseifried(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |770929(hashdos,oCERT-2011-0
| |03)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888
Kurt Seifried <kseifried(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |c.david86(a)gmail.com,
| |fedora-ocaml-list(a)redhat.co
| |m, rjones(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.