Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-anemone - Anemone web-spider framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-anemone - Anemone web-spider framework Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rebus@seznam.cz QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-anemone.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: Anemone is a Ruby library that makes it quick and painless to write programs that spider a website. It provides a simple DSL for performing actions on every page of a site, skipping certain URLs, and calculating the shortest path to a given page on a site. The multi-threaded design makes Anemone fast. The API makes it simple. And the expressiveness of Ruby makes it powerful.
Hello, Please could you review the package rubygem-anemone? It is needed for package whatweb.
Output from rpmlint: $ rpmlint rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.src.rpm rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm rubygem-anemone-doc-0.5.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm rubygem-anemone.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti rubygem-anemone.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/anemone-0.5.0.gem <urlopen error timed out> rubygem-anemone.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti rubygem-anemone.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary anemone
#The rest are false-positive warings about unexpanded macros = urlencoded chars in filenames rubygem-anemone-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/anemone-0.5.0/ri/Anemone/PageStore/shortest_paths%21-i.yaml %21 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 55 warnings.
Koji F13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2462142
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |632917
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |587978
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Bug 632919 depends on bug 632917, which changed state.
Bug 632917 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shoulda - Making ruby tests easy on the fingers and eyes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632917
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-09-12 14:23:17 EDT --- For some general issues, please also check my commentes on bug 632912. ! Note Usually when gem contains spec/ directory, $ rake spec should be executed in %check.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|632917 |632912
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
--- Comment #2 from Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz 2010-09-25 19:43:37 EDT --- Hello Mamoru, here updated packages: SPEC URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-anemone.spec SRPM URL: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-2.fc13.src.rpm
*BuildRoot I would like to keep BuildRoot for compatibility with EPEL5.
*%check Checks require couple of another rubygems packackages, which are not yet in Fedoram so I had to comment out this functionality for now.
Best regards Michal Ambroz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2010-10-03 16:53:51 EDT --- Almost okay.
* Explicit version specific dependency - We usually don't write explicit version specific dependency (like ">= 1.3.0" part on "Requires: rubygem(nokogiri)" when all packages on currently supported Fedora (or EPEL) branches statisfied such dependency because it is just redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
* %doc in -doc subpackage - %doc attribute in -doc subpackage is redundant because the name of the rpm already indicates that the files in the rpm is for documentation.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
--- Comment #4 from Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz 2011-04-11 20:07:37 EDT --- Updated package:
SPEC: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-anemone.spec SRPM: http://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/rubygem-anemone-0.5.0-3.fc14.src.rpm
- fixed doc package and explicit dependency as suggested Best regards Michal Ambroz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|13 |rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2012-04-16 22:11:49
--- Comment #5 from Michal Ambroz rebus@seznam.cz 2012-04-16 22:11:49 EDT --- Resigning in getting the anemone to Fedora.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632919
Bug 632919 depends on bug 632912, which changed state.
Bug 632912 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-robots - Simple robots.txt parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632912
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla