[Bug 452427] New: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description:
Windows can be managed in several layouts: tiled, maximized, dwindle, spiral, floating. Each layout can be applied on-the-fly, optimizing the environment for the application in use and the task performed.
Managing windows in tiled mode assures that no space will be wasted on the screen. No gaps, no overlap. Other layouts can be used for different purpose.
Floating layout which will let organize windows like any other window manager is present.
This is my first package and I need sponsor.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-06-22 17:15 EST ------- * rpmlint: clean
[root@dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm awesome.spec 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* tested i386 build
* mock succeeded
[root@dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# mock rebuild -r fedora-9-i386 ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
[root@dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# mock rebuild -r fedora-9-i386 ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm INFO: Start(../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) ... State Changed: build INFO: Done(../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm) Config(fedora-9-i386) 9 minutes 12 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-9-i386/result
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-06-22 17:29 EST ------- Actually rpmlint isn't clean:
awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11 awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXinerama awesome.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrandr
Why do you need explicit dependencies on those? rpm already finds dependencies on: libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libXinerama.so.1()(64bit) libXrandr.so.2()(64bit) and several others which you did not include explicitly.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-06-22 17:52 EST ------- Yup, true. Removed the autodetected deps. Only libconfuse >= 2.6 is left.
[root@dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmlint ../SRPMS/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm awesome.spec ../RPMS/i386/awesome-2.3.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-2.3.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs@n-dimensional.de
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-06-22 22:48 EST ------- *** Bug 427530 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |awesome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-03 06:36 EST ------- * Thu Jul 3 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2.3.2-1 - version bump - add libconfuse-devel as a build dep. - removed fedora as a vendor from .desktop file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@free.fr
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2008-07-05 09:30 EST ------- Please repost a link to the new srpm when you made a new version.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-06 04:23 EST ------- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
(spec file's link is the same)
Sorry for inconvenience.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2008-07-13 18:51 EST ------- libconfuse-devel is listed twice in BuildRequires. It should certainly be versionned in the BuildRequires too.
For the desktop file, I think that you should better call the file %{name}.desktop and install it with a cp. The guidelines are for .desktop files for use in menus. Also it seems to me that type=application and Icon=awesome32 are wrong for a xsession .desktop file. Also GenericName doesn't make much sense.
I would suggest using removing the doc installed as part of make install and use %doc instead.
/usr/share/awesome/ and /usr/share/awesome/icons are unowned.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-07-13 20:39 EST ------- libconfuse has been updated to 2.6 on my request back when I wanted to package awesome in bug 427530 and bug 427529 respectively, so that version requirement is definitely needed.
For reference purposes, this might be useful (or not):
http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/awesome/2.1-1.fc8/awesome.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-15 08:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8)
libconfuse-devel is listed twice in BuildRequires. It should certainly be versionned in the BuildRequires too.
Sure. Fixed. Both.
For the desktop file, I think that you should better call the file %{name}.desktop and install it with a cp. The guidelines are for .desktop files for use in menus.
Fixed.
Also it seems to me that type=application and Icon=awesome32 are wrong for a xsession .desktop file. Also GenericName doesn't make much sense.
Fixed.
I would suggest using removing the doc installed as part of make install and use %doc instead.
enhanced %configure part + added %doc <...>
/usr/share/awesome/ and /usr/share/awesome/icons are unowned.
I hope I fixed it with %dir now. Please, let me know whether still unfixed.
(In reply to comment #9)
For reference purposes, this might be useful (or not):
I took a look and found it useful, thanks. --
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-15 12:04 EST ------- Just a one line change:
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-4.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-16 13:52 EST ------- FYI your latest srpm does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=720416
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-16 14:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12)
FYI your latest srpm does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=720416
Indeed. Thanks for noting that Mamoru-san.
See %%description
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-5.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-07-16 15:13 EST ------- I'd guess the "Requires: libconfuse >= 2.6" is autodetected and should thus be removed, and having the "libconfuse >= 2.6" in BuildReq is sufficient. At least it was with my package. :-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-16 15:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14)
I'd guess the "Requires: libconfuse >= 2.6" is autodetected and should thus be removed,
No, is not.
Requires: ... libconfuse.so.0 ...
And because on F8 there's stil v2.5 I found it useful ATM.
and having the "libconfuse >= 2.6" in BuildReq is sufficient. At least it was with my package. :-)
you mean -devel, right?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-16 16:12 EST ------- * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-6.fc9.src.rpm
One more update -- libXinerama-devel was missing. Now it builds inside mock.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-07-16 18:22 EST ------- Meh. Of course I meant "BuildRequires: libconfuse-devel >= 2.6".
I'd add a comment on the reason for the "Requires: libconfuse >= 2.6", as that is not at all obvious.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-17 04:04 EST ------- 1.
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=720778
2.
[root@dhcp-lab-192 SPECS]# rpmquery libconfuse libconfuse-devel libconfuse-2.5-3.fc9.i386 libconfuse-devel-2.5-3.fc9.i386
checking for confuse... no configure: error: awesome requires libconfuse >= 2.6. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.45799 (%build)
When you have libconfuse-devel-2.6 but libconfuse-2.5 then it builds but it's not supported combination. I did not try to run awesome with old libconfuse.
3.
From my look to F8 repos I found out that there's still libconfuse-2.5 so I
insist ATM on "... >= 2.6" because when you can't build awesome on F8 there's no reason to ship it there. Or am I missing something?
I appreciate your comments, please, let me know what you think.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-17 04:24 EST ------- * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.2-7.fc9.src.rpm
* Thu Jul 17 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2.3.2-7 - after some discussion I removed explicit dependency on libconfuse >= 2.6; the thing is that awesome runs fine with libconfuse-2.5 but does not build with < 2.6. Some build-time hack might be possible but I am obviously not going to be involved in this auto*magic. (thx Hans Ulrich Niedermann)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-07-17 06:00 EST ------- The normal way things go is that the package is built in a rawhide chroot, an F-9 chroot, and an F-8 chroot. In each chroot, the BuildRequires: libconfuse >= 2.6" is properly tested. Only if successful, there will be a binary package for the respective release. And only if there is a binary package for the respective release, will someone usually install the software.
But if someone happens to take an F-9 binary and installs it on an F-8 system, the autodetected soname for libconfuse should provide the proper dependencies - iff the libconfuse people know how API/ABI compatibility and sonames are supposed to work. I have not checked whether this is the case.
Last time I built awesome (around awesome 2.1 times), awesome did not compile with libconfuse-devel 2.5, because some headers or macro definitions were missing in the 2.5 headers. That was why I added the 2.6 check to awesome's configure.ac (I was worked closely with awesome upstream at the time). It is possible that awesome's libconfuse requirements have changed since and it now works with libconfuse 2.5 again, but I have not researched that yet.
In the given state, I'd just say that awesome requires libconfuse-devel >= 2.6 to build, and as long as F-8 does not provide libconfuse-devel >= 2.6, there will be no awesome for F-8.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2008-07-18 05:59 EST ------- I have a build error on devel, when I have no network: $ /usr/bin/xmlto man awesomerc.5.xml xmlto: input does not validate (status 3) error : connection refused /home/dumas/RPM-fc/BUILD/awesome-2.3.2/awesomerc.5.xml:2: warning: failed to load external entity "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" D DocBook XML V4.2//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" ^ error : connection refused warning: failed to load external entity "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" validity error : Could not load the external subset "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.2/docbookx.dtd" Document /home/dumas/RPM-fc/BUILD/awesome-2.3.2/awesomerc.5.xml does not validate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-07-18 07:32 EST ------- That is a bug in xmlto and probably IIRC in some Docbook/XML/DTD/Catalog registration package. IIRC there was something on fedora-devel about this issue within the last few weeks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-22 08:43 EST ------- Does anyone have ideas about what to fix/enhance regarding the package? (Assuming the xmlto-related problem is another battlefield.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager Alias: awesome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
------- Additional Comments From mnowak@redhat.com 2008-07-28 10:34 EST ------- * Thu Jul 28 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2.3.3-1 - version bump fixes two bugs - give floating dialogs of maximized windows focus - awesomerc: fix xterm -e in case of others terms
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.3.3-1.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr 2008-08-08 11:02:19 EDT --- The xmlto issue seems to be fixed. I'll try to review the latest now that I can build it. I have no internet during the week end so hopefully on monday.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458784, 458785
--- Comment #27 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-12 05:58:55 EDT --- Bump to version 3.
This is completely new version which triggers two new dependencies not in Fedora libev bug 458785 and xcb-util bug 458784.
* Thu Aug 11 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.2.rc2 - bump to RC2
* Thu Aug 04 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.1.rc1 - bump to awesome v3-the new generation
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec * http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.2.rc2.fc9.src.rpm
Patch0 is in upstream git repo. For xsession file is filled bug upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|458785 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #28 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-12 06:11:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27)
Patch0 is in upstream git repo. For xsession file is filled bug upstream.
Implemented.
http://git.naquadah.org/?p=awesome.git;a=commit;h=d2f38d4051b90fd5b2deab3ddb...
Will do some tuning on it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #29 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-15 09:56:51 EDT --- Bump to RC3
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
* http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.3.rc3.fc9.src.rpm
* Thu Aug 15 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.3.rc3 - bump to RC3 - xsession desktop file is now provided by upstream - dumped patches awesome-3.0-rc1-fedora-doc-path.patch awesome-3.0-rc2-fedora-xsession-path.patch both are now in upstream - cmake is now need >2.6 (present in rawhide)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #30 from Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr 2008-08-18 11:07:56 EDT --- I can't download the srpm (that being said I am still too busy to review it ;-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #31 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-18 14:32:23 EDT --- :)
That's because of that ongoing Fedora infrastructure problems. Anyway, I have updated package with fixed build deps and other enhancements.
* http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec * http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.5.rc3.fc...
* Mon Aug 18 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.5.rc3 - buildepend on readline-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, luadoc - install via "install -p" - %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/themes/default is not a config file no more, having config file in /usr is kinda weird - added sub-package awesome-doc to handle API doc files
* Sat Aug 16 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.4.rc3 - awesome-3.0-rc3-enhance-wallpaper-cmd.patch: enhance setting of wallpaper - new dep: xsri - %%{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default is now handled configfile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #32 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-24 11:07:07 EDT --- Bump to RC4: ------------
dhcp-lab-192 newman # rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/awesome.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-doc-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc9.i386.rpm 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Builds OK in mock with xcb-util, libev and enhanced cairo.
* Sun Aug 24 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.6.rc4 - bump to RC4 - rejecting awesome-3.0-rc3-enhance-wallpaper-cmd.patch -- solved upstream via awsetbg script - using imlib2 instead of GTK+ pixbuf
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.6.rc4.fc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #33 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-08-29 17:29:24 EDT --- * Fri Aug 29 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.7.rc5 - bump to RC5
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.7.rc5.fc...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #34 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-09-06 10:17:13 EDT --- * Sat Sep 06 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-0.8.rc6 - bump to RC6 - /usr/share/awesome/themes/default is now, again, config file
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome.spec
http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/awesome/awesome-3.0-0.8.rc6.fc...
dhcp-lab-192 SPECS # rpmlint -i awesome.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/awesome-3.0-0.8.rc6.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-3.0-0.8.rc6.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-doc-3.0-0.8.rc6.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-3.0-0.8.rc6.fc9.i386.rpm awesome.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/awesome/themes/default A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files in /etc/ instead.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
See upstream bug:
http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=302
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #35 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-09-19 06:50:17 EDT --- * Fri Sep 19 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.0-1 - bump to 3.0
assam SPECS # rpmlint awesome.spec /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/awesome-3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-3.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-doc-3.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/awesome-debuginfo-3.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm awesome.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/awesome/themes/default 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #36 from Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr 2008-10-03 15:04:08 EDT --- I can't find libev-devel ?? In rawhide.
How comes lua files are not in %_datadir? They are not platform independent?
It is a bit strange to have an API for a window manager. Is it because lua is an interpreted language, so that the API has to come with runtime?
I think that it is wrong to have: %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default this file should be under the control of upstream/packager. Isn't it possible to override what is there with something in %_sysconfdir?
Build stops with -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found I don't have libev-devel, it may be the reason.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #37 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-10-06 05:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36)
I can't find libev-devel ?? In rawhide.
See bug 458785 for srpm package.
How comes lua files are not in %_datadir? They are not platform independent?
The are platform independent. Only rc.lua is not in %_datadir, but this is config file for awesome.
It is a bit strange to have an API for a window manager. Is it because lua is an interpreted language, so that the API has to come with runtime?
I probably don't understand... Awesome is using the lua files for it's own manipulation with windows and stuff. They are necessary to be bundled with runtime. Let me know if you have other comments.
I think that it is wrong to have: %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default this file should be under the control of upstream/packager. Isn't it possible to override what is there with something in %_sysconfdir?
It took me a long time to decide whether to shield that file or not. It's not possible to move it to /etc, I opened a bug in upstream but was closed wontfix (sorry cant find it in the crappy flyspray http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/).
It's possible to have it in user ~/.config/awesome.
I can change it from config file to ordinary one, if you wish, no problem.
Build stops with -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found I don't have libev-devel, it may be the reason.
No. the problem is cairo's missing XCB support (just Xlib). It necessary to recompile it with (--enable-xcb). See bug 465759.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458785, 465759
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|458785 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|465759 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458785, 465759
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pertusus@free.fr |
Bug 452427 depends on bug 458785, which changed state.
Bug 458785 Summary: Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 458784, which changed state.
Bug 458784 Summary: Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #38 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-12-19 04:36:51 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
Just an update for 3.1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #39 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2008-12-24 17:44:57 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm
* Wed Dec 24 2008 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.1-2 - minor SPEC-file changes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #40 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-01-13 07:29:17 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm
* Tue Jan 13 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.1.1-1 - 3.1.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michel Alexandre Salim michel.sylvan@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan@gmail.com
--- Comment #41 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel.sylvan@gmail.com 2009-02-09 08:33:50 EDT --- Does not build on Rawhide x86_64: -- checking for modules 'libev;glib-2.0;cairo;pango;pangocairo;x11-xcb;xcb-randr;xcb-xinerama;xcb-event>=0.3.0;xcb-aux>=0.3.0;xcb-atom>=0.3.0;xcb-keysyms>=0.3.0;xcb-icccm>=0.3.0;cairo-xcb;xproto>=7.0.11;imlib2' -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #42 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-02-09 09:23:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41)
Does not build on Rawhide x86_64:
Does not build on any Fedora. See bug 465759. You have to enable XCB backend in Cairo yourself to build at all.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #43 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-02-20 17:54:43 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2-0.1.rc3.fc10.src.rpm
-- * Fri Feb 20 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.2-0.1.rc3 - 3.2-rc3 - more docs files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #44 from lexual floss@lex.hider.name 2009-02-24 20:52:31 EDT --- http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-December/thread.html#1600...
More details about cairo & xcb.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #45 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-03-02 15:13:36 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2-0.2.rc4.fc10.src.rpm
-- * Mon Mar 2 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.2-0.2.rc4 - 3.2-rc4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #46 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-03-16 18:18:44 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2.fc10.src.rpm -- * Mon Mar 16 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com - 2.0.x-0.4.r6671 - snashot 6671
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #47 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-04-07 11:06:12 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- * Tue Apr 7 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.2.1-1 - 3.2.1 - rebased patch: awesome-3.2-libev-pkg-config.patch - define XDG_CONFIG_DIR as %%{_sysconfdir}/xdg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499579
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #48 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-07 06:06:50 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm --
* Thu May 7 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.3-0.1.rc1 - 3.3-rc1
Needs libxdg-basedir, see bug libxdg-basedir.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #49 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-13 04:48:15 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.2.rc2.fc11.src.rpm -- * Thu May 13 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.3-0.2.rc2 - 3.3-rc2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #50 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-19 04:30:48 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.3.rc3.fc11.src.rpm -- * Tue May 19 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.3-0.3.rc3 - 3.3-rc3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #51 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-28 07:13:17 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.4.rc4.fc11.src.rpm -- * Thu May 28 2009 Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 3.3-0.4.rc4 - 3.3-rc4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #52 from Bernie Innocenti bernie@codewiz.org 2009-05-28 12:26:46 EDT --- Is anyone providing a cairo package prebuilt with the xcb backend?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #53 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-05-28 12:52:25 EDT --- I don't think so. It's quite easy to DIY.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Alexey Torkhov atorkhov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov@gmail.com
--- Comment #54 from Alexey Torkhov atorkhov@gmail.com 2009-06-02 06:53:33 EDT --- As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways:
1. Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded.
2. Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override system cairo.
I’m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bernie Innocenti bernie@codewiz.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo@redhat.com
--- Comment #55 from Bernie Innocenti bernie@codewiz.org 2009-06-02 11:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54)
As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways:
XCB (the X Client Binding), not XKB (the X KeyBoard extension).
- Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But
here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded.
- Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and
add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override system cairo.
I’m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it?
Sounds like a very crude kludge, but it would most probably work.
Are you sure your time wouldn't be better spent reviewing cairo's XCB backend and determining what needs to be done in order to bring it on par with the libX11 backend?
You could write a summary to both the XCB and Cairo lists, asking if one of the developers wants to help you out.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #56 from Alexey Torkhov atorkhov@gmail.com 2009-06-03 17:25:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55)
(In reply to comment #54)
As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways:
XCB (the X Client Binding), not XKB (the X KeyBoard extension).
Oh, sure, thanks.
- Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But
here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded.
- Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and
add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override system cairo.
I’m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it?
Sounds like a very crude kludge, but it would most probably work.
Are you sure your time wouldn't be better spent reviewing cairo's XCB backend and determining what needs to be done in order to bring it on par with the libX11 backend?
You could write a summary to both the XCB and Cairo lists, asking if one of the developers wants to help you out.
Searching cairo list, I found: http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-December/016008.html
Merging XCB and Xlib backends may be the proper way in long term. But if that requires time of GSoC project... I don’t think I have that now, considering that I’m doing other GSoC project now. Packaging work looks to be less hard.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499517
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #57 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-06-12 09:23:06 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 499579, which changed state.
Bug 499579 Summary: Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA
Bug 452427 depends on bug 499517, which changed state.
Bug 499517 Summary: update startup-notification-0.10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499517
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Christian Krause chkr@plauener.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |chkr@plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #58 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-07-14 06:34:37 EDT --- Christian: I am glad you expressed intention to review this but just wanna let you know that this is still being blocked by bug 465759 and not going to be fixed any time soon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #59 from Christian Krause chkr@plauener.de 2009-07-14 18:43:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58)
Christian: I am glad you expressed intention to review this but just wanna let you know that this is still being blocked by bug 465759 and not going to be fixed any time soon.
Oh. You are right. I only scanned over the dependency list and it looked like that they were all fixed. ;-) I didn't expected a wontfix here...
Ok, so I guess the review will have to wait some more time...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf@gmail.com
--- Comment #60 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2009-07-26 23:40:23 EDT --- Just poking in here when I remembered that awesome looked interesting to try, but is it possible to package version 2.x until Cairo supports XCB? That would enable you to get sponsored and the package reviewed so that when XCB is enabled, awesome3 can come sooner. I can jump on as comaintainer then to help with the jump if you'd like.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #61 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-08-03 05:32:04 EDT --- Ben:
Correct awesome-2 does not need XCB aware cairo.
2.3 was released 14 months ago, but having small fixes till now, and is called deprecated in favor of v3.
Problem with your approach is that awesome v2 is really old, upstream support might end anytime, and thus is far from Fedora's close-to-upstream. Note that cairo-xcb is far from being soon-supported upstream (still experimental), that means we would have awesome-2 for months, if not even years. That's waste of time, from my POV.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #62 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-08-29 06:25:11 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #63 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-13 04:05:00 EDT --- Hmm, isn't it better to have some awesome2 than nothing?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #64 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-14 03:07:15 EDT --- Jens: See Comment #61. In brief: awesome v2 is near to dead code, which I personally don't care.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #65 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-14 22:13:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64)
awesome v2 is near to dead code
I know, but what about bug 465759? Feels like this is never going to happen?
Is it possible to make a separate package for cairo-xcb?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #66 from Michel Alexandre Salim michael.silvanus@gmail.com 2009-09-14 23:27:33 EDT --- Since it's unmaintained by cairo folks, and the awesome developers insist on using it, perhaps we should ask them to see if they would take on the task of supporting cairo-xcb?
After all, the current problems are stopping *their* window manager from shipping to a lot of users, and I consider Behdad's reasoning quite sound on this matter (the Ubuntu developers seem a bit more cavalier in this regard).
Michal, anyone on the developers' side that you could suggest this to?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #67 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-16 02:17:49 EDT --- $ rpmbuild --rebuild http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
: -- lua -> /usr/bin/lua -- luadoc -> /usr/bin/luadoc -- convert not found. CMake Error at awesomeConfig.cmake:41 (message): convert is required to build awesome Call Stack (most recent call first): awesomeConfig.cmake:62 (a_find_program) CMakeLists.txt:15 (include)
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
I think you need "BuildRequires: ImageMagick" btw.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #68 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-16 04:22:21 EDT --- Ok with a xcb patched cairo I then get to:
-- Configuring awesome-version-internal.h -- Configuring awesome.doxygen -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
(same with 3.3.4)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #69 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-16 06:55:01 EDT --- Thanks added missing BuildRequires. 3.3.4 build fine for me at my ordinary system, but fails in mock this way:
... DEBUG: -- checking for modules 'glib-2.0;libev;cairo;x11;pango>=1.19.3;pangocairo>=1.19.3;xcb-randr;xcb-xtest;xcb-xinerama;xcb-event>=0.3.6;xcb-aux>=0.3.0;xcb-atom>=0.3.0;xcb-keysyms>=0.3.4;xcb-icccm>=0.3.3;xcb-image>=0.3.0;xcb-property>=0.3.0;cairo-xcb;libstartup-notification-1.0>=0.10;xproto>=7.0.15;imlib2;libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' DEBUG: -- package 'libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' not found ...
And I am pretty sure libxdg-basedir-1.0.2 is installed, I can see it in mock DEBUG output...
Can anyone see the same in fedora-rawhide-i386 mock with http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-1.fc12.src.rpm ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #70 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-16 06:58:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #65)
(In reply to comment #64)
awesome v2 is near to dead code
I know, but what about bug 465759?
Well, Behdad feels it's upstream job to move with cairo-xcb, perhaps they don't see any benefits in that particular backend?
Feels like this is never going to happen?
When cairo-xcb is non-experimental and fully supported. Never say never :).
Is it possible to make a separate package for cairo-xcb?
We've discussed this topic in this bug several times. I'd prefer not to.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #71 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2009-09-16 08:27:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69)
Thanks added missing BuildRequires. 3.3.4 build fine for me at my ordinary system, but fails in mock this way: DEBUG: -- package 'libxdg-basedir>=1.0.0' not found
The BR is wrong, it should be on libxdg-basedir-devel, not libxdg-basedir.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #72 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-16 08:53:25 EDT --- Thanks Thomas, fixed here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-2.fc12.src.rpm (Builds fine in Mock.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #73 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-16 10:27:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #68)
Ok with a xcb patched cairo I then get to:
-- Configuring awesome-version-internal.h -- Configuring awesome.doxygen -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
(same with 3.3.4)
No idea what it means, can you please try it in mock? (fedora-rawhide-i386 seems to work for me.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #74 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-16 21:42:49 EDT --- You're right mock is fine and awesome3 is more awesome! :-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #75 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-18 06:01:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=361621) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=361621) awesome.spec-1.patch
Some small cleanup:
- integrate rctag macro - simplify removal of .in files and filelist
which should make 3.4 testing easier :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #76 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-09-18 06:45:53 EDT --- Thanks Jens, patch accepted and appreciated -- it includes what I always wanted to :).
http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.4-3.fc12.src.rpm
Expect 3.4 RC pkg, when I a have chance to try it and feel it's usable.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #77 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2009-09-18 17:14:45 EDT --- If someone is interested, I've built F11 packages and put them in a repo here: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/awesome/fedora-11.
(Use at your own risk.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #78 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-10-06 06:09:23 EDT --- awesome-3.4 + upstream patch here: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4-0.2.rc2.fc12.src.rpm Works quite nice; adapt your rc.lua.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #79 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-07 22:24:29 EDT --- (I just mention in passing that people who like awesome might want to take a look at bluetile too: which is also pretty cool and works in fedora today... See pkg review bug 522821 or something like this should work: # yum install cabal-install ghc-X11-devel ghc-gtk-devel ghc-glade-devel # cabal update # cabal install bluetile # ~/.cabal/bin/bluetile to give it a spin.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #80 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-10-12 04:17:05 EDT --- Updated awesome-3.4 to RC3 with path; untested, though.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #81 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-10-22 08:45:41 EDT --- 3.4 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4-1.fc12.src.rpm
It's quite the same as 3.4-rc3, just version changed. No need to update, I guess.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #82 from Felipe Contreras felipe.contreras@gmail.com 2009-10-25 08:27:46 EDT --- Is there any chance of getting this on F12?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #83 from Christian Krause chkr@plauener.de 2009-10-25 10:43:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #82)
Is there any chance of getting this on F12?
I'm afraid the chance is quite small since unfortunately awesome relies on xcb support in cairo which isn't there yet. There were lots of discussions about it in this bug report, e.g. comment #58 and comment #70.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #84 from Felipe Contreras felipe.contreras@gmail.com 2009-10-25 12:55:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #83)
(In reply to comment #82)
Is there any chance of getting this on F12?
I'm afraid the chance is quite small since unfortunately awesome relies on xcb support in cairo which isn't there yet. There were lots of discussions about it in this bug report, e.g. comment #58 and comment #70.
That's a shame. Who's fault is that?
It looks like awesome is supported on all the major distributions (and several minor ones), so the finger seems to be pointing to Fedora =/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #85 from Bernie Innocenti bernie@codewiz.org 2009-10-25 23:04:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #84)
That's a shame. Who's fault is that?
It looks like awesome is supported on all the major distributions (and several minor ones), so the finger seems to be pointing to Fedora =/
Indeed. On the other hand, the Fedora maintainer for Cairo seems to have a sound argument: Cairo's XCB backend has been unmaintained for years and therefore carries a number of bugs that were fixed in the X11 backend.
Couldn't anyone involved with Awesome step forward and have a good look at what needs to be done to bring the XCB backend in Cairo on par with the X11 backend?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #86 from Behdad Esfahbod besfahbo@redhat.com 2009-10-26 17:36:44 EDT --- Or just change awesome to use cairo-xlib. What's wrong with doing that?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #87 from Bernie Innocenti bernie@codewiz.org 2009-10-26 20:17:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #86)
Or just change awesome to use cairo-xlib. What's wrong with doing that?
Is it even an option? I thought all of Awesome was written to use directly XCB rather than X11.
Side note: I used to think that XCB was a rather pointless project when it was still in the works. Now that XCB became the libX11 backend, migrating applications and toolkits to XCB sounds like a nice way to simplify the X stack a little and slightly reduce its associated overhead.
So I'm glad to see early adopters like Aswesome paving the road for the others to follow.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #88 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-11-22 05:33:02 EDT --- 3.4.1 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #89 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2009-11-22 06:14:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #88)
3.4.1 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm
Looks broken: It has a size of only 16k.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #90 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-11-23 06:20:29 EDT --- Thanks for letting me know - re-uploaded now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #91 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2009-12-02 05:21:00 EDT --- 3.4.2 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #92 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-01-04 18:01:48 EDT --- 3.4.3 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #93 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-03-04 17:39:39 EST --- 3.4.4 in fp.o. http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #94 from Bill McGonigle bill-bugzilla.redhat.com@bfccomputing.com 2010-03-05 15:12:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #85)
Couldn't anyone involved with Awesome step forward and have a good look at what needs to be done to bring the XCB backend in Cairo on par with the X11 backend?
Good news from upstream is that they're moving to use the XCB backend by default and are building cairo-xlib-xcb as a compatibility layer, so we should see -xcb as default before long (see bug 465759 comment #11)
I wonder if anybody here has already started building cairo for Fedora this way? There's probably a mass rebuild required though for cairo-xlib-xcb.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meyering@redhat.com
--- Comment #95 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2010-05-10 13:51:47 EDT --- any change/progress? I've just built it from source twice, for F13. It'd be nice not to have to do that.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Spencer Tom Tafadzwa Chirume schirume@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?
--- Comment #96 from Spencer Tom Tafadzwa Chirume schirume@gmail.com 2010-05-10 14:07:32 EDT --- I agree it would be great to have a lean window manager in the form of awesome since not everyone runs on the same hardware, use of lesser machines making another desktop environment can make a world of difference to some especially in F13 or onwards. Any hopes of getting awesome in F13?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #97 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-05-13 17:14:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #95) Jim: We are still missing official support in cairo for XCB, It's not in F-13, it could be in F-14, there's some effor in this regard.
Spencer Tom Tafadzwa Chirume: Here applies the same for Jim. You are free to rebuild cairo with XCB backend (see it's spec file), install it and rebuild awesome srpm you can find here.
When XCB backend is supported one in cairo awesome will be in Fedora Collection soon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #98 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-05-17 06:29:54 EDT --- 3.4.5 in fp.o. http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.5-1.fc13.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #99 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2010-06-04 07:27:16 EDT --- Updated packages in http://thm.fedorapeople.org/awesome/ for F11, F12 and F13.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Bug 452427 depends on bug 465759, which changed state.
Bug 465759 Summary: Build cairo with XCB support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465759
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #100 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-07-23 09:53:57 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.6-1.fc13.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
d. johnson drjohnson1@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drjohnson1@gmail.com
--- Comment #101 from d. johnson drjohnson1@gmail.com 2010-08-02 15:26:08 EDT --- A long time ago, Cairo needed an additional compile flag. Is that no longer required in f13?
(Is there another bz with the RFE for cairo?)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #102 from Christian Krause chkr@plauener.de 2010-08-02 15:59:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #101)
A long time ago, Cairo needed an additional compile flag. Is that no longer required in f13?
That's IMHO still needed.
(Is there another bz with the RFE for cairo?)
Yes, bug #465759 blocks this one.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #103 from d. johnson drjohnson1@gmail.com 2010-08-02 16:12:52 EDT --- Do you want to setup cairo/awesome as a repo ("new_repo") on fedorapeople ?
Seems like it would be quick to download the current srpm for both, build and upload again. This might make it easier for folks to test.
Also, your readme should probably mention both of the bz id's if anyone has questions about them.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #104 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2010-08-02 16:28:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #103)
Do you want to setup cairo/awesome as a repo ("new_repo") on fedorapeople ?
See http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/thm/awesome (3.4.6 not yet there, but will be soon).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #105 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-08-26 16:56:21 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.7-1.fc13.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #106 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2010-10-18 16:26:55 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.8-1.fc13.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #107 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2010-10-26 14:19:22 EDT --- Failed to build
F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2554875 F-15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2554869
Please, test your packages in Koji before submitting them.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #108 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-10-26 14:28:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #107)
Failed to build
F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2554875 F-15: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2554869
Please, test your packages in Koji before submitting them.
They failed due to Fedora's cairo not having xcb enabled. Known issue (Bug #465759).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #109 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2010-10-28 09:48:57 EDT --- Doesn't build on F-12 nevertheless, because of a cmake incompatibility:
-- Configuring awesome.doxygen CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:284 (file): file does not recognize sub-command COPY [...] -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
Seems it needs a small patch to use install(FILES...) instead of file(COPY...) for cmake 2.6.x.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #110 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2010-10-28 17:19:19 EDT --- Building on F14 from sources, the first step is to rebuild cairo with --enable-xcb, but that fails:
RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/cairo/cairo-xcb.h /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/cairo-xcb-shm.pc /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/cairo-xcb.pc
To get past that, I had to add these lines to the %files section of cairo.spec:
%{_includedir}/cairo/cairo-xcb.h %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/cairo-xcb-shm.pc %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/cairo-xcb.pc
Otherwise, these instructions worked fine: http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Awesome-3-fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #111 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2011-02-18 05:56:37 EST --- Anyone's aware what's the status on XCB in Cairo front? Also, anyone's aware what happens in their Git (http://git.naquadah.org/?p=awesome.git;a=summary)? It seems to me that the new major release takes ages...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #112 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-02-18 06:08:30 EST --- Not aware, but definitely annoyed to still have to build my own RPMs, and especially to have to rebuild any time cairo changes.
I thought the XCB/Cairo transition was to have been resolved for Fedora 14.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #113 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-02-18 07:00:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #112)
Not aware, but definitely annoyed to still have to build my own RPMs, and especially to have to rebuild any time cairo changes.
As always, RPMS for current stable releases are in http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/thm/awesome/
I just stopped announcing that anytime there's a new version.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #114 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-02-18 07:47:05 EST --- Thanks. I've used those and do appreciate them. If you were to do the same for rawhide, I would be all set ;-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #115 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-03-04 05:26:37 EST --- (In reply to comment #114)
Thanks. I've used those and do appreciate them. If you were to do the same for rawhide, I would be all set ;-)
Added packages for F15 and rawhide. Have fun! :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2011-05-16 11:47:49
--- Comment #116 from Michal Nowak mnowak@redhat.com 2011-05-16 11:47:49 EDT --- 3.4.10 is out. ...and I realized I don't care about awesome anymore.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #117 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-05-22 14:15:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #115)
(In reply to comment #114)
Thanks. I've used those and do appreciate them. If you were to do the same for rawhide, I would be all set ;-)
Added packages for F15 and rawhide. Have fun! :)
Thank you, Thomas (belatedly). Sorry to learn that Michal no longer cares.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #118 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-05-25 10:12:28 EDT --- I see there are now RPMs for awesome-3.4.10. Thank you, Thomas.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #119 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-09-20 14:42:23 EDT --- Thomas, any chance of a refresh? I see that there's a new cairo out. If you had an i686 repository, I'd use it ;-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #120 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-09-27 12:41:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #119)
Thomas, any chance of a refresh? I see that there's a new cairo out. If you had an i686 repository, I'd use it ;-)
You mean f16? I recently updated my repository, please give it a try.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #121 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-09-27 13:34:44 EDT --- Yes, exactly. Thank you. However, when I try to update, I get this:
--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: awesome-3.4.10-2.fc16.i686 (fedora-awesome) Requires: xsri You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ...
There's probably a way to tell yum to ignore that requirement (which is just fine, afaict), but I don't know it. Or maybe there's another source for the now-missing-in-F16 package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #122 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-09-28 15:29:14 EDT --- Seems xsri has been retired, so I removed awesome's dependency on it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #123 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-09-28 15:41:22 EDT --- Now it installs without a hitch. Thanks!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #124 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-10-17 04:48:35 EDT --- I've now switched to F16+awesome on my desktop too. Works well. Thanks again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Lars Kellogg-Stedman lars@oddbit.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lars@oddbit.com
--- Comment #125 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman lars@oddbit.com 2011-11-17 09:34:25 EST --- Thomas,
I don't know if this is the appropriate place to report this problem, but the default configuration for "awesome" as installed by this package appears to use "xterm" for the "open terminal" command. Unfortunately, "xterm" is not included by default under common F16 (and possibly earlier) desktop configurations.
I would suggest either:
- Adding xterm as a requirement to the awesome rpm, or - Have the default configuration call "exo-open --launch TerminalEmulator", which will use the preferred terminal emulator as configured by the desktop environment.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #126 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-11-18 05:42:02 EST --- Thanks for the feedback!
(In reply to comment #125)
I would suggest either:
- Adding xterm as a requirement to the awesome rpm, or
This would be easy.
- Have the default configuration call "exo-open --launch TerminalEmulator",
which will use the preferred terminal emulator as configured by the desktop environment.
exo-open is xfce-specific. There is unfortunately no desktop-agnostic way of opening a terminal emulator, xdg-terminal is not there (yet).
So, I am a bit unsure whether exo-open is the right choice. Changing the package would be easy of course.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #127 from Lars Kellogg-Stedman lars@oddbit.com 2011-11-18 09:43:58 EST --- I hadn't realized that about exo-open (I thought it was one of those generic things like xdg-open). So it's probably best just to add xterm as a dependency.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #128 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2011-11-18 10:09:59 EST --- This is where it'd be nice to have "recommends". I use roxterm, so have no use for xterm.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
Renato Botelho rbgarga@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbgarga@gmail.com
--- Comment #129 from Renato Botelho rbgarga@gmail.com 2011-12-05 06:30:15 EST --- Is there any plans to have 3.4.11 on fedora repo?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #130 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2011-12-05 09:52:07 EST --- (In reply to comment #129)
Is there any plans to have 3.4.11 on fedora repo?
Plans - yes, timeframe - no.
Need to sort out how to have xcb-utils 3.8 and three libs that have been splitted off xcb-utils packaged for F16 so they don't conflict with official packages.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #131 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2012-03-26 01:45:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #130)
(In reply to comment #129)
Is there any plans to have 3.4.11 on fedora repo?
Plans - yes, timeframe - no.
Need to sort out how to have xcb-utils 3.8 and three libs that have been splitted off xcb-utils packaged for F16 so they don't conflict with official packages.
Hi Thomas, do you have anything that works with F17? My desktop now runs F17, and I found that the -rawhide rpms did not work there. Building from source rpms didn't work either, due to protected multilib problems with cairo, so I ended up building from sources, and the result works, but RPMs would be better...
Thanks,
Jim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #132 from Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmx.de 2012-04-12 16:43:37 EDT --- Hi Jim,
(In reply to comment #131)
Hi Thomas, do you have anything that works with F17?
The repo has been updated, can you give it a try?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427
--- Comment #133 from Jim Meyering meyering@redhat.com 2012-04-13 12:31:07 EDT --- Hi Thomas, I've just installed it on F17/x86_64 and (as usual) it works perfectly. Thanks again!
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla