Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: python-tw2 - Web widget creation toolkit based on TurboGears widgets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Summary: Review Request: python-tw2 - Web widget creation toolkit based on TurboGears widgets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: ---
Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw2.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw2-2.0-0.1.b6.fc15.src.rpm Description: ToscaWidgets is a web widget toolkit for Python to aid in the creation, packaging and distribution of common view elements normally used in the web.
The tw2.core package is lightweight and intended for run-time use only; development tools are in tw2.devtools.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Luke Macken lmacken@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |720813
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Bug 720818 depends on bug 720813, which changed state.
Bug 720813 Summary: Review Request: python-strainer - Tools to allow developers to cleanup web serialization objects (HTML, JSON, XHTML) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720813
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA
--- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-04 19:40:23 EDT --- I'm the upstream for tw2.core. Since there are so many tw2.* packages, it makes sense for core to be explicitly named python-tw2-core in Fedora.
Here I've updated the spec to include running the unit tests and have updated it for the latest 2.0.1 release of tw2.core.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: ToscaWidgets is a web widget toolkit for Python to aid in the creation, packaging and distribution of common view elements normally used in the web.
The tw2.core package is lightweight and intended for run-time use only; development tools are in tw2.devtools.
koji-f17 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3964429 koji-el6 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3964440
The el6-candidate scratch build fails due to python-strainer. It would need to be packaged for el6 to move forwards there.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #2 from Luke Macken lmacken@redhat.com 2012-04-04 19:55:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
koji-el6 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3964440
The el6-candidate scratch build fails due to python-strainer. It would need to be packaged for el6 to move forwards there.
Done. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-strainer-0.1.4-2.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-tw2 |Review Request: |- Web widget creation |python-tw2-core - Web |toolkit based on TurboGears |widget creation toolkit |widgets |based on TurboGears widgets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-10 15:42:51 EDT --- Just updated the spec again for an upstream release of tw2.core. Also added the %{?dist} macro to the Release attribute.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.2-1.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #4 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-10 15:46:30 EDT --- Whoops. I mis-pasted the link to the SRPM.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Marcelo Moreira de Mello mmello@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |mmello@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-11 14:02:06 EDT --- Another update, now to version 2.0.3 which includes upstream changes that fix rpmlint complaints. This is documented in the .spec changelog.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |811689
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |811759
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #6 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-16 18:37:41 EDT --- Another update, now to version 2.0.4 which includes better support for the test suite on python2.6 and support for older versions of python-simplejson.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Marcelo Moreira de Mello mmello@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmello@redhat.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #7 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-24 21:01:20 EDT --- Here is the rpmlint output:
% find . -name "python-tw2-core*" ./RPMS/noarch/f17/python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc17.noarch.rpm ./SPECS/python-tw2-core.spec ./SRPMS/python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
% find . -name "python-tw2-core*" -exec rpmlint {} ; python-tw2-core.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. python-tw2-core.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |me@ryanlewis.net
--- Comment #8 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net 2012-04-24 21:42:08 EDT --- Ralph since I don't think I can give formal reviews, here is review, aided by fedora-review software:
Package Review ==============
Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 [!]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [?]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [?]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [?]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
python-tw2-core.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
python-tw2-core.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/rhl/720818/tw2.core-2.0.4.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : 5b19c7cedb9d0b700244ac6f92eed3ac MD5SUM upstream package : 5b19c7cedb9d0b700244ac6f92eed3ac
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [?]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [?]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [?]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [?]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [?]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Issues: [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag [!]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 See: None -----------------------------------------------
We should check on the precise requirements for EPEL and buildroot, since, those are generated automagically by fedora-review. It looks like there are a lot of -docs? If a -docs is not justified, then we can obviously change this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #9 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net 2012-04-24 21:43:19 EDT --- oh, and make sure to post your latest succesful koji builds.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-24 22:27:41 EDT --- Here's the latest revision. It packages a new upstream version of tw2.core and fixes the issues you listed. The Buildroot has been removed. The %clean section has been removed, the %defattr is removed and the removal of buildroot at the beginning of %install has been removed.
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.fc17.src.rpm
koji - f17 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4020626 koji - el6 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4020627
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |me@ryanlewis.net
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) me@ryanlewis.net 2012-04-28 19:43:54 EDT --- Formal Review
This package is approved!
Package Review ==============
Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated
==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 [x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc18.src.rpm
python-tw2-core.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint python-tw2-core-2.0.4-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
python-tw2-core.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US devtools -> toadstools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/rhl/720818/tw2.core-2.0.4.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : 5b19c7cedb9d0b700244ac6f92eed3ac MD5SUM upstream package : 5b19c7cedb9d0b700244ac6f92eed3ac
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [?]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [?]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [?]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [?]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [?]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [?]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com 2012-04-28 20:45:00 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: python-tw2-core Short Description: Web widget creation toolkit based on TurboGears widgets Owners: ralph lmacken Branches: f17 el6 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-04-29 16:53:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-29 22:31:49 EDT --- python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.fc17
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-29 22:41:05 EDT --- python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.el6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-30 14:32:26 EDT --- python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |818293
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-22 11:35:26
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- python-tw2-core-2.0.5-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #19 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-tw2-core New Branches: epel7 Owners: ralph InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720818
--- Comment #21 from Ralph Bean rbean@redhat.com --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.stg.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/modules/memcached
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org