[Bug 195412] New: Review Request: obconf

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

[Bug 727030] New: Review Request:...

[Bug 665733] New: Review Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

14 Jun 2006 14 Jun '06

10:16 p.m.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

Summary: Review Request: obconf Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: peter@thecodergeek.com QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com

[ Resubmitting review request due to Bugzilla's earlier troubles. ]

Spec URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/obconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thecodergeek.com/downloads/fedora/obconf-1.6-1.src.rpm

Description: ObConf is a graphical configuration editor for the Openbox window manager.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

16 Jun 16 Jun

1:38 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

panemade@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@gmail.com

------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2006-06-16 02:30 EST ------- Review for this package:- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint shows no error - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package obconf, in the format obconf.spec - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license GPL. - MUST: The License field in the package obconf.spec file matches the actual license in COPYING file in tarball. - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. - MUST: The package successfully compiled and build into binary rpms on i386. - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: This package have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. - MUST: This package used macros. - MUST: Document files are included. - MUST: This Package did not contained any .la libtool archives - MUST: This Package include a obconf.desktop file, and that file is installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section with following warning obconf.desktop: key "Categories" string list not semicolon-terminated, fixing - MUST: No duplicate files in installation

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:42 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

peter@thecodergeek.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |195292

------- Additional Comments From peter@thecodergeek.com 2006-06-16 10:34 EST ------- Adding bug dependency on Openbox's review request, as this uses its -devel subpackage as a build requirement.

Red Hat Bugzilla

18 Jun 18 Jun

3:50 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

panemade@gmail.com changed:

Red Hat Bugzilla

19 Jun 19 Jun

1:44 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

panemade@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info |panemade@gmail.com

Red Hat Bugzilla

6:05 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

panemade@gmail.com changed:

------- Additional Comments From panemade@gmail.com 2006-06-19 06:57 EST ------- Above is Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored

Red Hat Bugzilla

28 Jun 28 Jun

11:51 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

Bug 195412 depends on bug 195292, which changed state.

Bug 195292 Summary: Review Request: Openbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195292

Red Hat Bugzilla

10 Jul 10 Jul

10:12 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

jtorresh@gmail.com changed:

Red Hat Bugzilla

12 Jul 12 Jul

11:29 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

------- Additional Comments From jtorresh@gmail.com 2006-07-13 00:20 EST ------- Review:

+ rpmlint shows no error. + package meets the naming guidelines. + spec-file is properly named. + package meets the packaging guidelines. + package license is open-source compatible (GPL). + license field matches the actual license. + license file included in %doc. + spec file is written in english. + spec file is legible. + source files match upstream: aaf62498b11d52dfce7a0b6060867a19 obconf-1.6.tar.gz + package successfully compiled, built and tested on i386 (rawhide). + all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + package doesn't need to use %find_lang (no locales present). + package doesn't contain shared libraries. + package isn't relocatable. + package owns all directories that it creates. + no duplicate files in %files. + file permissions are properly set. + package has a %clean section. + package uses macros consistently. + package contains code, not content. + no -doc subpackage needed. + %docs don't affect application runtime. + package doesn't contain headers, static libraries or pkgconfig files (no devel package). ? GUI application; desktop file is installed with a small warning (as pointed out by Parag AN): I don't think this issue is worth patching the file (specially since it is automatically fixed) but I do think a bug should be filed upstream. + package doesn't own directories owned by other packages.

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Jul 13 Jul

6:27 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

------- Additional Comments From jtorresh@gmail.com 2006-07-13 19:18 EST ------- Peter:

Don't forget to report a bug upstream for the .desktop semicolon issue.

APPROVED.

Red Hat Bugzilla

6:30 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

jtorresh@gmail.com changed:

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:33 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

------- Additional Comments From peter@thecodergeek.com 2006-07-13 22:24 EST ------- Built for Devel. Once it's been branched to FC-4 and FC-5, I'll build for those and close this as NEXTRELEASE.

Jorge: I have contacted the author about it. Thanks for your review. :)

Red Hat Bugzilla

22 Jul 22 Jul

11:28 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

peter@thecodergeek.com changed:

------- Additional Comments From peter@thecodergeek.com 2006-07-23 00:19 EST ------- Built successfully for FC-4 and FC-5 branches too. Thanks for your time.

Red Hat Bugzilla

31 Dec 31 Dec

5:30 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

Christian.Iseli@licr.org changed:

------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli@licr.org 2006-12-31 06:30 EST ------- Please do not remove the FE-ACCEPT blocker. Thanks.

Red Hat Bugzilla

4 Jan 4 Jan

1:03 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

peter@thecodergeek.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |obconf

Red Hat Bugzilla

2 Jun 2 Jun

4:21 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

bugzilla@redhat.com changed:

peter@thecodergeek.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?

------- Additional Comments From peter@thecodergeek.com 2007-06-02 17:21 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: obconf Updated Fedora Owners: extras-orphan@fedoraproject.org

I'm orphaning openbox, obconf, and obmenu as I no longer use them and feel that my time is better spent dedicated to my other packages. Thanks.

Red Hat Bugzilla

4 Jun 4 Jun

4:53 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

tcallawa@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@redhat.com 2007-06-04 17:53 EST ------- Orphaned.

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Jun 13 Jun

3:07 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

mlichvar@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?

------- Additional Comments From mlichvar@redhat.com 2007-06-13 04:07 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: obconf Updated Fedora Owners: mlichvar@redhat.com

Red Hat Bugzilla

9:59 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: obconf Alias: obconf

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

wtogami@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+

Red Hat Bugzilla

22 Mar 22 Mar

11:11 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com changed:

--- Comment #12 from Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar@redhat.com 2012-03-22 12:11:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: obconf New Branches: el6 Owners: mlichvar splinux

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

11:43 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-03-22 12:43:16 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:27 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-22 18:27:58 EDT --- obconf-2.0.3-9.20100212gitb04658.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/obconf-2.0.3-9.20100212gitb04658.el6

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8 Apr 8 Apr

12:03 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 195412] Review Request: obconf

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195412

Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:

--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2012-04-08 13:03:49 EDT --- obconf-2.0.3-9.20100212gitb04658.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

4407

Age (days ago)

6531

Last active (days ago)

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

22 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla