Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Summary: Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juankprada@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://public.juankprada.com/smb4k.spec SRPM URL: http://public.juankprada.com/smb4k-0.10.10-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Smb4K is an SMB/CIFS share browser for KDE. It uses the Samba software suite to access the SMB/CIFS shares of the local network neighborhood. Its purpose is to provide a program that's easy to use and has as many features as possible.
Also, This is my first package and I would like someone to sponsor me to maintain this package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
--- Comment #1 from Juan Camilo Prada Ojeda juankprada@gmail.com 2011-10-18 14:18:54 EDT --- Created attachment 528860 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=528860 Sudo patch for smb4k
Forgot to mention, this package includes a patch fo work around an issue with sudoers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rdieter@math.unl.edu Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |656997(kde-reviews) Alias| |smb4k
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
--- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2011-10-19 13:26:09 EDT --- Fairly simple, and clean.
naming: ok
license: ok
macros: ok
scriptlets: ok
patches: SHOULD: please document patches. what are they for? what does it fix? have you contacted upstream? if so, provide bug or mailing list references.
sources: NOT OK $ md5sum *.bz2 27851bf2e675006885e7706fb91ee8af smb4k-0.10.10.tar.bz2
re-downloaded from upstream sources: 637ca913ffe9ac24a4dd09d4eddf0dcf smb4k-0.10.10.tar.bz2
MUST: regenerate srpm with pristine upstream sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(juankprada@gmail. | |com)
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2011-11-19 18:35:46 EST --- ping? Juan, are you still interested in maintaining this in fedora?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |656997(kde-reviews) | Alias|smb4k | Flag|needinfo?(juankprada@gmail. | |com) | Last Closed| |2011-12-15 15:14:31
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2011-12-15 15:14:31 EST --- :( Looks like a dead review then.
Feel free to re-open when/if you're still interested in pursuing this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu --- clearing review flag
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla