php-devel September 2007

php-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
4 discussions

RFC for PHP Guidelines Update
by Remi Collet 27 Jan '09

27 Jan '09

Please read the draft : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PHP * Requires and Provides * Macros and scriptlets And give feedback before this being proposed to FPC. Comments on "channels" are also welcome ;) Remi.

3 4

Zend's PDT
by Konstantin Ryabitsev 28 Feb '08

28 Feb '08

So... Does anyone feel brave enough to try packaging PDT? :) http://zend.com/pdt/ Cheers, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Montréal, Québec

2 2

Re: rpms/php-pear-Mail-Mime/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 php-pear-Mail-Mime.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4
by Brandon Holbrook 07 Sep '07

07 Sep '07

Remi Collet wrote: > Brandon Holbrook (static) a écrit : > >> -BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 >> +BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1.6.0 >> Requires: php-pear(PEAR) >> >> > You should probably keep "epoch" in this BR > > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.6.0 > or > BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.6.0 > > (to avoid build on EL4, with php-pear 0:4.3.9) > > But, is it really a BuildRequires or a Requires ? > > Regards. > > Thanks Remi, good eye. I tried to find another pear package in devel that was taking advantage of the new pear 1.6 to use as a template, but couldn't find one. I've updated Mail-Mime to read: BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2 Requires: php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.6.0 Since you are correct that I technically only need 1.6 at run time, not build time. BUT now that I stare at that for a moment.... is Requires enough, or should it actually be Requires(post) since this version of Mail_Mime needs to use pear 1.6 at rpm install time and not just run time? Is that already implied through my Requires(post): %{__pear}, or does that still ignore corner cases like updating from f[0-7]->f8? If you try to install Mail_Mime 1.5.x on f7 you get "pear/Mail_Mime requires PEAR Installer (version >= 1.6.0), installed version is 1.5.0" Thoughts? Any other pear packagers crossed this bridge already in rawhide?

1 0

PHP extension in EL4
by Remi Collet 03 Sep '07

03 Sep '07

I've a look to PHP and extensions in EL4. We have a lot "PEAR" and PECL extensions in EPEL for EL5 which cannot go to EPEL for EL4 because of very old PHP and PEAR version. RHEL 4 users can use packages from RHWAS (Web Application Stack 1.0) ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/4/en/RHWAS/SRPMS ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates/enterprise/4ES/en/RHWAS/SRPMS We found there - php-5.1.6 (as for RHEL5) - pear-1.4.11 CentOS 4 users can use packages from centosplus repository We found there all RHWAS RPM and a lot of RPM from Fedora/EPEL (i've read some changelog to verify) http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/SRPMS/ I think the packages from EPEL-5 could easily be maintain for an EPEL-4+ repository (using RHEL + RHWAS as references). I also think it's quite strange than CentOS repository is more complete than EPEL using only RHEL + Fedora community work... What must we do in EPEL-4 ? Regards

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

php-devel September 2007