python-bugzilla March 2014

python-bugzilla@lists.fedorahosted.org

6 participants
6 discussions

Support for SubComponents
by Tomas Mlcoch 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

Hi guys, I have a question. Is there someone already working on support for SubComponents API [1]? Regards Tomas [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/docs/en/html/api/extensions/SubComponents/lib/W… -- Tomas Mlcoch (irc: tmlcoch) Release Configuration Management Brno, Czech Republic

2 6

ANNOUNCE: python-bugzilla 1.0.0 released
by Cole Robinson 26 Mar '14

26 Mar '14

I'm happy to announce a new release of python-bugzilla, version 1.0.0. With the addition of python3 support, now seemed like as good a time as any to go 1.0 :) python-bugzilla is a library and commandline tool for interacting with a bugzilla instance, including querying, modifying, and creating bug reports. The release can be downloaded from: https://fedorahosted.org/released/python-bugzilla/python-bugzilla-1.0.0.tar… This release includes: - Python 3 support (Arun Babu Neelicattu) - Port to python-requests (Arun Babu Neelicattu) - bugzilla: new: Add --keywords, --assigned_to, --qa_contact (Lon Hohberger) - bugzilla: query: Add --quicksearch, --savedsearch - bugzilla: query: Support saved searches with --from-url - bugzilla: --sub-component support for all relevant commands Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release through testing, bug reporting, submitting patches, and otherwise sending in feedback! Thanks, Cole

2 1

Examples of querying with a flag?
by Bryan Kearney 24 Mar '14

24 Mar '14

I am trying to use the python api to query based on flags. I have tried build_qeury with lines like: flag = ["sat-6.0.3+"], and flag = [{"name": "sat-6.0.3", "status": "+"}], neither of which seem to work. Are there examples of using the API to query via flags? Thanks in advance. -- bk

2 2

Not switching python-bugzilla to github
by Cole Robinson 23 Mar '14

23 Mar '14

Hey all, A few times on this mailing list there's been mention of possibly moving to host on github (mostly through Arun's prodding :) ): https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/python-bugzilla/2013-September/000… I just spent some time considering it some more, and I've decided I don't want to do the move. I like github. The main benefits I see for moving there is that 1) It can double as the project homepage and we can drop trac, 2) it is way faster than fedorahosted, and 3) it will likely generate more outside contributions #3 is really the big 'advantage'. But here's the thing, and maybe it's total sacrilege, but I don't really want to increase the number of contributions. I more or less fell into this role because a bugzilla.redhat.com update totally broke python-bugzilla in 2012. I was using the tool locally, and set out to help fix things. It grew from there to where I'm the primary maintainer/developer. I put in a lot of time in the first year to make things robust and basically feature complete, but nowadays I would call python-bugzilla 'done'. I'm happy to fix bugs, cut releases, add the occasional feature when a new bugzilla version comes out, but that's about the extent of my energy for it. Despite the fact that the tool/library should work with most bugzilla versions in the wild, the reality is that its primary usage is talking to bugzilla.redhat.com. Fedora infrastructure depends on it, many many RH employed people depend on it for their own workflow. My absolute primary motivation is to keep things working cleanly for those people. My second motivation is keeping the required maintenance effort as low as possible. My fear with moving to github is that other people would try out the tool, find it lacking in their setup, and either file issues or provide non-trivial patches to do what they want it to do. github makes it really easy. I honestly don't want it to be easy, because if someone has an idea about adding extra smarts to the API, or CLI, or making it more pythonic, it's basically all antithesis to motivation #1, and reviewing those patches is against motivation #2. And the reality is that there's already a bunch of other tools that do similar things, just googling 'python bugzilla' brings up a bunch of other options. So there are other options if people want to make something work in their setup, I'd rather keep python-bugzilla right where it is. Another big bit is that I don't have any workflow around github. I have workflow for bugzilla.redhat.com and patches on mailing lists, it would take some time for me to integrate keeping up with github into all that. So overall it would make things harder for me, while providing a big benefit that I don't want nor do I think the current users would benefit from. (If there was a way to send pull-request notifications to a mailing list, this would ease the burden for me a bit. But there isn't: https://github.com/github/github-services/issues/804 ) So, yeah. Questions, comments, insults, ...? - Cole

1 0

[PATCH] Use urllib unquote to allow boolean support for e.g. spaces
by Paul W. Frields 20 Mar '14

20 Mar '14

I don't recall if I sent this patch in earlier, but it's quite useful to be able to use spaces in certain fields like whiteboard.

2 4

[PATCH] Fix bugzilla detection behind proxy
by Jani Nikula 20 Mar '14

20 Mar '14

Python requests handles proxying, use it also during bugzilla detection phase. Don't bother with cookies at this point. --- bugzilla/__init__.py | 3 ++- bugzilla/base.py | 15 ++++++++------- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/bugzilla/__init__.py b/bugzilla/__init__.py index e6fdeef03566..95bf53875c1e 100644 --- a/bugzilla/__init__.py +++ b/bugzilla/__init__.py @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ log = getLogger("bugzilla") from bugzilla.base import BugzillaBase as _BugzillaBase from bugzilla.base import BugzillaError +from bugzilla.base import RequestsTransport from bugzilla.bugzilla3 import Bugzilla3, Bugzilla32, Bugzilla34, Bugzilla36 from bugzilla.bugzilla4 import Bugzilla4, Bugzilla42, Bugzilla44 from bugzilla.rhbugzilla import RHBugzilla, RHBugzilla3, RHBugzilla4 @@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ class NovellBugzilla(Bugzilla34): def getBugzillaClassForURL(url): url = Bugzilla3.fix_url(url) log.debug("Detecting subclass for %s", url) - s = ServerProxy(url) + s = ServerProxy(url, RequestsTransport(url)) rhbz = False bzversion = '' c = None diff --git a/bugzilla/base.py b/bugzilla/base.py index bb7b9405bf1c..4553e1c3cdc7 100644 --- a/bugzilla/base.py +++ b/bugzilla/base.py @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ def _build_cookiejar(cookiefile): class RequestsTransport(Transport): user_agent = 'Python/Bugzilla' - def __init__(self, url, cookiejar, + def __init__(self, url, cookiejar=None, sslverify=True, sslcafile=None, debug=0): # pylint: disable=W0231 # pylint does not handle multiple import of Transport well @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ class RequestsTransport(Transport): self.request_defaults = { 'cert': sslcafile if self.use_https else None, - 'cookies': cookiejar, + 'cookies': cookiejar if cookiejar else None, 'verify': sslverify, 'headers': { 'Content-Type': 'text/xml', @@ -157,12 +157,13 @@ class RequestsTransport(Transport): response.encoding = 'UTF-8' # update/set any cookies - for cookie in response.cookies: - self._cookiejar.set_cookie(cookie) + if self._cookiejar is not None: + for cookie in response.cookies: + self._cookiejar.set_cookie(cookie) - if self._cookiejar.filename is not None: - # Save is required only if we have a filename - self._cookiejar.save() + if self._cookiejar.filename is not None: + # Save is required only if we have a filename + self._cookiejar.save() response.raise_for_status() return self.parse_response(response) -- 1.7.9.5

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

python-bugzilla March 2014