qa-devel September 2013

qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
31 discussions

Review Request 37: Fix sequences in alembic
by Martin Krizek 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

1 4

[Fedora QA] #381: Bug and Update syncs shouldn't be halted by an isolated problem with one update or bug
by fedora-badges 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

#381: Bug and Update syncs shouldn't be halted by an isolated problem with one update or bug --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Undetermined Future Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = problem = The current bug and update sync algorithms are very fragile in that one error will stop the entire sync algorithm, leaving stuff out of sync with bodhi or bugzilla. This has caused problems in the past = analysis = This could be solved by better error handling in the sync process such that an error is logged but doesn't bubble up to the main sync code and halt the entire process. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/381> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #384: Improve documentation
by fedora-badges 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

#384: Improve documentation --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+------------------------ = problem = At the moment, our documentation is out of date and somewhat incomplete. = analysis = Update the docs and find an appropriate place for them to live. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/384> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist
by fedora-badges 09 Dec '13

09 Dec '13

#416: irc list sort order doesn't match html buglist --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+------------------------ = bug description = The sort order of the bugs displayed on the html buglist (milestone/XX/YY/buglist) doesn't match the sort order used when generating the irc list for meetbot. This causes some confusion and annoyance when the order of bugs discussed in the meeting is not what appears in the list that participants are looking at = fix recommendation = Make the sort order consistent as component,bzid for both lists -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/416> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

[Fedora QA] #387: Updates pending stable show as stable
by fedora-badges 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

#387: Updates pending stable show as stable --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- A package that is in updates-testing and is pending stable is shown as [stable] in the app. That can cause some confusion (i.e. one of us can close a related bug by assuming the package is already stable, and the package push can be cancelled afterwards). I think the app should display the repository the package is currently in, not the repository the package in pending to. What do you think? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/387> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

Review Request 45: Improve asset management
by Martin Krizek 14 Nov '13

14 Nov '13

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 357 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/357 Repository: blockerbugs Description ------- commit d86f88d7f9da899ffef44ad617a8a831327b7d80 Author: Martin Krizek <mkrizek(a)redhat.com> Date: Mon Aug 12 16:40:16 2013 +0200 Improve asset management Fixes: #357 I have not minified two js files in milestone_stats.html template as I am not sure it's worth it, any objections? Diffs ----- requirements.txt 09e0318bc189512f5d324bda8879ad74c4763f95 blockerbugs/templates/layout.html 49cdbd70ef8347965dfca93971449688f9cd6cb0 blockerbugs/__init__.py bd9973579e80fc859f3e8d22c35753fbd024c5f0 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/45/diff/ Testing ------- Loaded pages, seems like css and js work as expected after being minified. Thanks, Martin Krizek

1 10

[Fedora QA] #417: app dependencies are missing in epel6
by fedora-badges 12 Nov '13

12 Nov '13

#417: app dependencies are missing in epel6 --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+------------------------ = issue = As we're adding flask-admin in the devel branch, it has unsatisfied dependencies in epel6 ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991730 rhbz reference]). Those dependencies are: * [http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-wtf-peewee.git python-wtf- peewee] * [http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-peewee.git python-peewee] * [http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python-flask-mongoengine.git python- flask-mongoengine] We need to have el6 builds of these deps before we can deploy to -devel and getting everything figured out will help the maintainers of those packages get epel6 builds done more quickly = Task Description = Get all three rpms building in epel6 so we can add them to a side repo and get to testing the upcoming release. It would be best if we fixed the specs the right way and sent patches to each packages' maintainer so that actual epel6 builds can get done sooner. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/417> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

Review Request 42: Indicate bugs that are needinfo
by Martin Krizek 12 Nov '13

12 Nov '13

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for blockerbugs. Bugs: 316 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/316 Repository: blockerbugs Description ------- This patch adds a needinfo field into the Bug table. The field is filed with the name of a user that the info is needed from, or empty string if needinfo is not set. If needinfo is set, an icon is displayed in bug list in the same way as the 'recently modified' icon -- any ideas on how to display the information better? Diffs ----- sass/app.scss 061016495d9c46aef0efb5dcfc9e3a5eab43f72c blockerbugs/util/bug_sync.py 49cce49740cd6f5b1f430f58c8d1b522e1f0b7e3 blockerbugs/templates/blocker_list.html 17cdc74d5cac7be3d3843196eeda9e01f1c91ff3 blockerbugs/static/css/app.css 99b6fbc81b231c7f876f1365cfc63f6eade1217e blockerbugs/static/css/app-foundation.css 852272bf1bd1c629b30933b451daceec31812de7 blockerbugs/models/bug.py 095cf7294a5b0a5b3fb9979abf9e669e4acd157c alembic/versions/23cc8daafea8_add_needinfo_to_bug.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/42/diff/ Testing ------- Run db sync, one of the bugs had needinfo flag set, everything worked as expected. Thanks, Martin Krizek

1 14

[AutoQA] #444: autoqa tests are not able to make bodhi comments
by fedora-badges 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

#444: autoqa tests are not able to make bodhi comments ---------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Future tasks Component: core | Keywords: Blocked By: | Blocking: ---------------------+-------------------------- Most, if not all autoqa tests which should be making bodhi comments are now erroring out with output similar to the following: {{{ 09/30 16:22:38 INFO | test:0577| Submitting results (log, email, bodhi, resultsdb) for: depcheck: PASSED; 1 PASSED for tcl-trf-2.1.4-7.fc20 09/30 16:22:38 INFO | test:0457| Log created: /usr/share/autotest/results/default/depcheck/results/tcl- trf-2.1.4-7.fc20.html 09/30 16:22:39 INFO | test:0403| Email not sent: "depcheck: PASSED; 1 PASSED for tcl-trf-2.1.4-7.fc20" 09/30 16:22:39 ERROR|bodhi_util:0249| An error occured: string indices must be integers 09/30 16:22:39 ERROR|bodhi_util:0250| Could not connect to bodhi! 09/30 16:22:39 ERROR|bodhi_util:0250| Could not post a comment to bodhi }}} Figure out why bodhi comments are failing and fix it. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/444> AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org> Automated QA project

1 4

[Fedora QA] #386: Update URLs should comtain the update ID when possible
by fedora-badges 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

#386: Update URLs should comtain the update ID when possible --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Undetermined Future Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = problem = The update URLs fetched from bodhi are most reliable when they are based off of the update ID which is generated when the update is pushed to testing. However, the blocker tracking app generally grabs the URL before this happens and thus, end up with the preliminary url based on update contents. = analysis = The update sync process should look to replace any update URLs which are not based on the update ID when the sync runs against bodhi. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/386> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

qa-devel September 2013