relnotes-content June 2013

relnotes-content@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
27 discussions

[Bug 228729] New: review of README-Accessibility for F7
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228729 Summary: review of README-Accessibility for F7 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: release-notes AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwade(a)redhat.com QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com We need to be sure to review and update (including copyright details) this file for F7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

2 9

[Bug 243337] New: Package should require yelp for its help
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Apr '18

11 Apr '18

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243337 Summary: Package should require yelp for its help Product: Fedora Core Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fedora-release-notes AssignedTo: jkeating(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl(a)redhat.com CC: mcepl@redhat.com,relnotes@fedoraproject.org This package uses yelp for its help. Therefore, it should require package yelp for its operation. [Filed by a script; forgive him if he made a mistake for once.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

2 4

[Bug 977413] New: named: "PID file has been moved to /run/named/named.pid" should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Dec '13

09 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977413 Bug ID: 977413 Summary: named: "PID file has been moved to /run/named/named.pid" should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: thozza(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: Since F19 the named PID file has been moved from default location (/var/run/named/named.pid) to new location (/run/named/named.pid). If someone is using custom named.conf based on older Fedora (before F19), then they need to add a pid-file statement into options section to point to the new PID file location. options { ... pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; ... }; Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 Actual results: No documentation. Expected results: Release note informing about this change or it should be somewhere documented. Additional info: There is already F19 Bug #977191 cased by not informed user. Sorry for the late Bug. The change was made by previous maintainer and I'm not aware of any existing note warning about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 970468] New: Inconsistent expression in Development section of Fedora 19 release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970468 Bug ID: 970468 Summary: Inconsistent expression in Development section of Fedora 19 release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: Under Development section, There is a paragraph: Python programmers who use the xml ... <package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its own ... code and unmaintained upstream. I think what the sentence "<package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its own" expressing is wrong and inconsistent with previous statement. <package>PyXML</package> is replaced, not <function>stdlib</function>. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 beta How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: It should be changed. For example, change it to: <function>stdlib</function> replaced the <package>PyXML</package> code with its own. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 977771] New: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile" be in the past tense?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977771 Bug ID: 977771 Summary: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile" be in the past tense? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: In the following sentence: "In previous releases, journal data was stored in <filename>/var/run/journal</filename>, which is volatile and cleared on reboot." Should "which is volatile..." be written in the past tense? Does it mean "which was volatile..."? I'm sorry if I misunderstand the sentence. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 973173] New: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973173 Bug ID: 973173 Summary: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 759599 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759599&action=edit Fix typo Description of problem: Desktop.xml for F19 has a typo. Look at the following diff (the patch is attached): diff --git a/en-US/Desktop.xml b/en-US/Desktop.xml index 9bd23e1..99bf5d7 100644 --- a/en-US/Desktop.xml +++ b/en-US/Desktop.xml @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The latest release of the popular desktop environment <productname>Cinnamon</productname> brings new features and polish to Fedora &PRODVER;, including: <simplelist> <member> - <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily modified to itegrate it's behavior with Cinnamon. + <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily modified to itegrate its behavior with Cinnamon. </member> <member> <emphasis>screensaver</emphasis> has been improved, including a lock screen with customizable away message. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 972256] New: The release notes on the website have grammar errors, missing words. Not all my corrections were implemented.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972256 Bug ID: 972256 Summary: The release notes on the website have grammar errors, missing words. Not all my corrections were implemented. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 758390 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=758390&action=edit Corrected Fedora 19 release notes. Description of problem: I worked on the draft of the release notes, pointed out via markups, errors in grammer, missing words and miss spellings. It was decided to not correct some of the errors and publish. I have prepared a document which highlights the errors, and most of all, corrects an omission in an Appendix A3. My original release notes submission was done at end-April. Hereto this bug is an update to the release notes. I would use the collaboration features of libreoffice, but not everyone knows how to use it. Therefore I have resorted to coloring text yellow to show removals, red to show insertions and to also insert words that were omitted. I also asked some questions as to what the author was trying to say. We all, myself included are guilty of omitting words when we write our first draft. Because we think while we write, a good proof read of the document is needed. So I am reporting 25+ corrections to the release notes shown on the website. The document with the corrections is attached. I am also very disappointed that the proofreading effort was not recognized. In that regard, I included an additional Appendix A3. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 Release notes. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 971252] New: [PATCH] various improvements to the new web development section
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Aug '13

01 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971252 Bug ID: 971252 Summary: [PATCH] various improvements to the new web development section Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Created attachment 757490 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=757490&action=edit [PATCH 1/2] add information about Django 1.5 I added a section for the new version of Django and improved the Node.js section a little bit. Unfortunately I came up empty with other ideas for this, though. :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

fedora_requires_release_note canceled: [Bug 969436] Review Request: php-PHP-CSS-Parser - A Parser for CSS Files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Remi Collet <fedora(a)famillecollet.com> has canceled Remi Collet <fedora(a)famillecollet.com>'s request for fedora_requires_release_note: Bug 969436: Review Request: php-PHP-CSS-Parser - A Parser for CSS Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969436

1 0

fedora_requires_release_note requested: [Bug 969436] Review Request: php-PHP-CSS-Parser - A Parser for CSS Files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jun '13

30 Jun '13

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Remi Collet <fedora(a)famillecollet.com> has asked for fedora_requires_release_note: Bug 969436: Review Request: php-PHP-CSS-Parser - A Parser for CSS Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969436 ------- Additional Comments from Remi Collet <fedora(a)famillecollet.com> Thanks ! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: php-PHP-CSS-Parser Short Description: A Parser for CSS Files Owners: remi Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC:

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

relnotes-content June 2013