test October 2003

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

482 participants
982 discussions

rhgb reverts to "no details" after check for new hardware
by Gerry Tool 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

When I boot on my fully updated FC test3 system, and select show details, the screen shows a few lines of details and then after the check for new hardware reverts to the summary screen with no details. I didn't try a second click on show details to see what it does. Gerry

2 2

Palm hotsync to memory card
by Christopher A. Williams 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Is there a way with gnome-pilot to sync data to and from the memory expansion card? I can't find anything specific, but this would be very useful for me. Cheers, Chris -- ==================================== "If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence, try orderin' someone else's dog around." --Cowboy Wisdom

1 0

2.6 + lvm2
by Neal D. Becker 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

I see some posts that I need to update lvm -> lvm2 BEFORE attempting to use 2.6 kernel. I didn't find much info on how to do this. I do see this: http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/suse/suse/x86-64/suppleme… Does fedora also need an lvm2 rpm? It isn't in the current fedora stuff.

1 0

bogus rawhide entries?? (desktop-backgrounds-basic 2.0.17)
by Vanco, Don 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

I should mention that the "rpm" (below) did, in fact, contain nothing but HTML Is this the same issue that others have seen with up2date pulling (well, attempting to pull) rawhide files that no longer exist??? [root@localhost up2date]# rpm -Fvh desktop-backgrounds-* error: open of <!DOCTYPE failed: No such file or directory error: open of HTML failed: No such file or directory error: open of PUBLIC failed: No such file or directory ....the problematic file was actually desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0.17.noarch.rpm Worthy of Bugzilla? Don

3 2

flash plugin
by Mike Lurk 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Has anyone figured out the problem with the flash plugin for Mozilla. It still doesn't show up in Mozilla plugins section under help in the Mozilla browser (ver 1.4 and 1.5). Are there fonts missing ? I haven't tried to use the latest version of Netscape to see if it does the same thing. Mike

2 1

issue with gpm
by Vanco, Don 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

I had an issue with gpm - want to see if others have it as well. Steps to reproduce: boot to runlevel 5 hop to VC1 try mouse (mine did nothing) What I did: went to runlevel 3 (gpm stopped and restarted) - no change went to runlevel 1 then back to 3 (ibid, no change) Initial install of T3 was w/3 button PS/2 I fixed it by running mouseconfig and setting the mouse to 2-button PS/2 with emulation. (BTW - a "service gpm restart" did nothing). This fixed it - but if I go in and set up for a 3 button PS/2 gpm then fails _occasionally_. If I flop back and forth between 2-button and 3-button I get very inconsistent behaviour. It seems to be working now so this is going to be a tough one to bugzilla. System is an IBM StinkPad A21m (3 button PS/2) Don

1 0

Re: Culpability and RELEASE-NOTES
by Mike Lurk 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Message: 19 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:24:53 -0500 From: leam <leam(a)reuel.net> To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com Subject: Re: Culpability and RELEASE-NOTES Reply-To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com Ed wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 15:57, leam wrote: > >>Edward C. Bailey wrote: > > >>Hmph... you'd never make it in corporate america Ed. You need to blame >>the problem on someone else. Easy targets are SCO, solar flares, or >>"overly aggressive marketing deadlines". > > > You forgot to blame Microsoft too. Shame on you. > > > > -- > Edward Simmonds RHCE, OCP Nyah.....who ever heard of anything from Microsoft staying up long enough to accomplish anything? The box that the software comes in makes a nice paper weight. That is accomplishing something. Mike

2 1

Uh-oh, firstboot still says "TEST"!
by Barry K. Nathan 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108671 Firstboot still says "TEST" in one of its logos. Given how "TEST" has been removed from the desktop background and the installer, perhaps this is an oversight? If this is indeed an oversight, please make sure it gets fixed before the final release! -Barry K. Nathan <barryn(a)pobox.com>

2 1

Wanted - kernel 2.6 RPM including misc changes
by Neal D. Becker 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Currently, we have a set of kernel-2.6test rpms, but AFAIK, these don't quite do everything needed to convert fedora to 2.6 kernel. People still need to do some editing, such as mkdir /sys edit /etc/fstab edit /etc/rc.sysinit I think it would be useful to include this stuff in an rpm.

2 1

OO won't create/open documents
by Mike Lurk 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Message: 11 Subject: OO won't create/open documents From: Lauri Jutila <lists(a)reforge.fi> To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:27:50 +0200 Reply-To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com What's wrong with my system? OpenOffice won't create or open any OO documents. When I try to create or open a document, it'll show a filter selection window and after selecting or not selecting a filter, the window happily closes and nothing happens. This occurs with OO versions 1.1.0-3 and Jakub's "optimized" 1.1.0-4. I have these packages installed: * openoffice.org-1.1.0-3 * openoffice.org-libs-1.1.0-3 * openoffice.org-i18n-1.1.0-3 Am I missing something here or has anybody else had similar problems? OO *used* to work fine. -- Lauri Jutila Chief Linux Fellow, Reforge lists(a)reforge.fi http://www.reforge.fi Have you Mozilla installed or not. OpenOffice has a dependency that Mozilla must be installed. I have both Mozilla 1.4 and Mozilla 1.5 installed on my machine and OpenOffice works fine for me. One other thing I have Star Office 7 installed as well and it works fine.

4 3

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
99
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test October 2003