test May 2004

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

540 participants
783 discussions

Re: megaraid 2 drivers for FC2?
by Philip Pokorny 27 May '04

27 May '04

The 2.00.3 driver is hideously out of date which is probably why it didn't detect your card. Get at least 2.10.3 or later. Unfortunately, they might not have driver disks for FC2 yet. Up until just recently (the last 3 months or so?) LSI was doing most of it's development in the 1.18 driver with versions up to 1.18j last time I looked. They recently merged that work into the 2.x driver. Be aware there are 64-bit bugs in the releases before 2.10.3 that affect Opterons with more than 4G of memory. :v) Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Eric Wood writes: > >>> Has anyone got a LSI 320 raid card going with FC 2 final or beta? I just >>> tried installing FC2 final and it doesn't detect the controller with the >>> megaraid driver. I was expecting to see a megaraid2 in the list - but not >>> there. FC1 installed fine with the old megaraid driver. Now FC2 doesn't >>> seem to even see the controller at all even with the same megaraid driver. >>> Perhaps someone knows of a supplement driver disk?

2 2

Scanner problem - solved...
by Neil B. Cohen 27 May '04

27 May '04

FYI, I asked about a scanner problem a couple of days ago. My PSC 2175 printed and scanned with Fedora Test 3 when I bought it, and would print under the Fedora 2 release, but did not recognize the scanner. Several people responded with suggestions about permissions, but I found the answer at LinuxQuestions.org (Thanks!). It is necessary to run the command /etc/init.d/hpoj setup to configure the scanner properly. I must have done that with the previous Fedora release and then forgot about it... After running that command, then xsane or kooka do detect the scanner. Thanks to those who responded! And I will move future questions to the fedora-list mailing list since I'm now working with the official release... nbc

1 0

Fedora Core 2 Test Update: cups-1.1.20-11
by Tim Waugh 27 May '04

27 May '04

Please try out these updated packages. If you find a problem report it as a comment on this bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124523 If there are no problems by Thursday June 3rd I'll make this an official update. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora Test Update Notification FEDORA-2004-144 2004-05-27 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Product : Fedora Core 2 Name : cups Version : 1.1.20 Release : 11 Summary : Common Unix Printing System Description : The Common UNIX Printing System provides a portable printing layer for UNIX� operating systems. It has been developed by Easy Software Products to promote a standard printing solution for all UNIX vendors and users. CUPS provides the System V and Berkeley command-line interfaces. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Update Information: Several problems have been fixed, including: o some HTTP handling bugs o failure to use encryption when required o start-up appears to succeed even when it fails --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Wed May 26 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 1:1.1.20-11 - Build requires make >= 3.80 (bug #124472). * Wed May 26 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 1:1.1.20-10 - Finish fix for cupsenable/cupsdisable (bug #102490). - Fix MaxLogSize setting (bug #123003). * Tue May 25 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 1:1.1.20-9 - Apply patches from CVS (authtype) to fix STR #434, STR #611, and as a result STR #719. This fixes several problems including those noted in bug #114999. * Mon May 24 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> - Use upstream patch for exit code fix for bug #110135 [STR 718]. * Wed May 19 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 1:1.1.20-8 - If cupsd fails to start, make it exit with an appropriate code so that initlog notifies the user (bug #110135). * Thu May 13 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> - Fix cups/util.c:get_num_sdests() to use encryption when it is necessary or requested (bug #118982). - Use upstream patch for the HTTP/1.1 Continue bug (from STR716). * Tue May 11 2004 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 1:1.1.20-7 - Fix non-conformance with HTTP/1.1, which caused failures when printing to a Xerox Phaser 8200 via IPP (bug #122352). - Make lppasswd(1) PIE. - Rotate logs within cupsd (instead of relying on logrotate) if we start to approach the filesystem file size limit (bug #123003). --------------------------------------------------------------------- This update can be downloaded from: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/testing/2/ 8ab79f39ebcaac45e0c8746d23d09c09 SRPMS/cups-1.1.20-11.src.rpm 198e8e7c49ac81e6782ec1915e00ec37 i386/cups-1.1.20-11.i386.rpm 59cb62356cf1ad7115386bd005a4e1bc i386/cups-devel-1.1.20-11.i386.rpm 95236115dde1cb37442cb268a8e5f3f4 i386/cups-libs-1.1.20-11.i386.rpm 653d449bec46a143ba507311a7b08ab2 i386/debug/cups-debuginfo-1.1.20-11.i386.rpm 9972c542e058ebf6baf741ef24cc24fa x86_64/cups-1.1.20-11.x86_64.rpm d53bc896e5be5ed85a0328bd05324cf4 x86_64/cups-devel-1.1.20-11.x86_64.rpm c6e17010e7a7fde4e099841d58c023b3 x86_64/cups-libs-1.1.20-11.x86_64.rpm cbf5c1a10cf462cbe3bb42126fdb5304 x86_64/debug/cups-debuginfo-1.1.20-11.x86_64.rpm 95236115dde1cb37442cb268a8e5f3f4 x86_64/cups-libs-1.1.20-11.i386.rpm This update can also be installed with the Update Agent; you can launch the Update Agent with the 'up2date' command. You may need to edit your up2date channels configuration. Within /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources enable the following line: yum updates-testing http://fedora.redhat.com/updates/testing/fedora-core-2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: Error messages on new version of autofs on FC2
by John Kelly 26 May '04

26 May '04

David Pullman wrote: >>We have a several indirect NIS maps that support >>Fedora, RedHat 9, SGI >>and Sun workstations, including a homedirs map. The >>homedirs mounts a ........... We see this problem as well..one of our developers believes he has isolated it to the util-linux package---quoting him: Somebody added a few nfs patches to the util-linux rpm. One of them, util-linux-2.11z-01-nfs.patch, parses nfs options passed to the mount command. It does not like the noquota option. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/

1 0

megaraid 2 drivers for FC2?
by Eric Wood 26 May '04

26 May '04

Has anyone got a LSI 320 raid card going with FC 2 final or beta? I just tried installing FC2 final and it doesn't detect the controller with the megaraid driver. I was expecting to see a megaraid2 in the list - but not there. FC1 installed fine with the old megaraid driver. Now FC2 doesn't seem to even see the controller at all even with the same megaraid driver. Perhaps someone knows of a supplement driver disk? -Eric Wood

3 2

RE: 1920x1200 LCD unwanted borders
by Ernest L. Williams Jr. 26 May '04

26 May '04

Hi This did not work for me under Fedora2 -----Original Message----- From: fedora-test-list-bounces(a)redhat.com on behalf of Sean Hogston Sent: Wed 5/26/2004 9:29 AM To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases Subject: Re: 1920x1200 LCD unwanted borders Here is my config. This is on FC1 with the nvidia driver. Sean On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 17:47, Sean Hogston wrote: > > what chipset do you have? Nvidia? > > Yes, I have Nvidia. > Please help. > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 07:08, Ernest L. Williams Jr. wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a DELL Precision M60. > > > > > > When I choose a resolution 1920x1200, I end up with unwanted 0.5in. > > > borders on the side. How can this be resolved? > > > > > > On the other hand if I choose 1920x1440 then the display is indeed full > > > but my task bar is now off the bottom of the display. Does any one have > > > a magic "XF86Config" file? > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > -- > > > Ernest L. Williams Jr. <ernesto(a)ornl.gov> > > > > > >

2 1

Re: new kernel for testing
by Law Horne 26 May '04

26 May '04

> Well my networking fails with the new kernel. This is what I get in > /var/log/boot.log : > > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) > bytes of data. > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: --- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics --- > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 > errors, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: , pipe 4 > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo ifup: failed. > May 25 20:53:40 Basanizo network: Bringing up interface eth0: failed > > > It works just fine in 2.6.5-1.358. Also I did not notice before but > but > mdmpd fails also, on both kernels apparently. But if I understand what > this is correctly I do not even need this running unless I have a raid > setup(which I don't) is that correct? Well in anycase if there is an > easy way to fix this I ddo not know it. > > Thanks Law Maybe I should mention my setup. I have a asus A7N8X nforce 2 MOBO. And the nic is of course the onboard nforce 2 ethernet controller. And I have a linksys router sitting between me and my cable modem. As I mentioned before it works fine on 2.6.5-1.358. Nothing special about the setup just generic settings for sharing a connection and networking with a windows machine. Law

1 0

Really strange CDRW problem
by Paul F. Johnson 26 May '04

26 May '04

Hi, I have some CDRWs which work up to x10. To my understanding, that means they're happy on CDRWs upto x10. When I try to burn using k3b or xcdroast, all that I get is that the drive doesn't support x10 discs. These discs work fine on a Win98 box with a 8x4x32 drive in (iomega zip CDRW - same as I have in my linux machine) Any ideas what gives on this? TTFN Paul -- "Your lives are in the hands of men no smarter than you or I, many of them incompetent boobs. I know this because I worked alongside them, gone bowling with them, watched them pass me over for promotions time and again. And I say ... This stinks!" - Homer Simpson

3 2

gdb error messages : No such file or directory
by Mark Fonnemann 26 May '04

26 May '04

Hello- is anyone else seeing this? i'm referring to the "errors while reading/mapping library symbols"... [root@markf78 code]# gcc exp.c -g [root@markf78 code]# gdb a.out GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.0post-0.20040223.19rh) Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) b main Breakpoint 1 at 0x8048380: file exp.c, line 8. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/code/a.out Error while mapping shared library sections: : Success. Error while reading shared library symbols: : No such file or directory. Error while reading shared library symbols: : No such file or directory. Error while reading shared library symbols: : No such file or directory. Breakpoint 1, main () at exp.c:8 8 for (j=1; j<=2046; j++) (gdb) my programs appear to run fine but this message seems like something is amuck somewhere... here's my version info, it's pretty much FC2 updated to rawhide (with exception of the kernel): [root@markf78 code]# rpm -qa | grep glibc glibc-2.3.3-30 glibc-devel-2.3.3-30 glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.46 glibc-common-2.3.3-30 glibc-headers-2.3.3-30 [root@markf78 code]# rpm -q gdb gcc kernel gdb-6.0post-0.20040223.19 gcc-3.3.3-7 kernel-2.6.6-1.368 mark. :-) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/

2 1

some items that might be of interest to FC2 developers and users
by John Natschev 26 May '04

26 May '04

Hey to all at the list. I have some questions but will start with some general comments first. I have installed FC2 successfully. Great work in getting it out. It looks and works great. I have found some issues: 1. If no hostname has been assigned during install and the system cannot determine its hostname via dhcp, the system is assigned a hostname of localhost.localdomain. This in itself is fine. If one subsequently assigns a hostname, using any of the methods available, it breaks a gnome daemon. When one logs in gnome error messages are display some of which have been written about to the list already. I haven't noticed a workaround, though. 2. Does anyone know why Komodo-2.5.2 won't work with FC2? When executed is displays fine and initial menu operation works but when trying to actually execute a menu function, eg. file open, it looks like the request was executed but nothing happens. 3. Does anyone know why the SUN JRE plugin doesn't display some java stuff using mozilla? I do Internet Banking and installed the SUN JRE 1.4.2, even tried the 1.5 beta, and the java app doesn't display. By the way, this also happens with RHEL ES v3. Is there a particular JRE I should install or is there something more sinister? Cheers, John.

2 1

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
79
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test May 2004